disputant

简明释义

英[dɪˈspjuːtənt]美[ˈdɪspjʊtənt]

n. 争论者，辩论者；竞赛者

adj. 争论的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The negative confirmation suit is requesting the court confirmed the disputant legal relationship does not exist or denies some kinds of existent suit.

消极确认之诉是请求法院确认争议的法律关系不存在或否定某种存在状态的诉。

2.The negative confirmation suit is requesting the court confirmed the disputant legal relationship does not exist or denies some kinds of existent suit.

消极确认之诉是请求法院确认争议的法律关系不存在或否定某种存在状态的诉。

3.A mediator should not guarantee results, especially if such guarantee could be perceived as favoring one type of disputant or industry over another.

特别是如果这样保证可能被察觉象倾向争论者或产业的一种类型在别的的斡旋人不应该保证结果。

4.The two parties met in court, each represented by a lawyer who argued fiercely for their respective disputant.

这两个当事人在法庭上会面，各自由律师代表，激烈辩论他们各自的争议方。

5.During the mediation session, the disputant expressed their frustrations clearly.

在调解会议上，争议方清楚地表达了他们的沮丧。

6.The disputant was unwilling to compromise, which prolonged the negotiation process.

争议方不愿妥协，这延长了谈判过程。

7.In a debate, each disputant presented their arguments with supporting evidence.

在辩论中，每个争议方都提出了有支持证据的论点。

8.The referee had to intervene when the disputants started shouting at each other.

当争议方开始互相大喊时，裁判不得不介入。

作文

In today's world, where communication and dialogue are crucial for resolving conflicts, the role of a disputant (争论者) has become increasingly significant. A disputant is an individual or party engaged in a disagreement or dispute, often presenting arguments to support their position while countering the claims of others. This dynamic is essential in various contexts, such as legal proceedings, academic debates, and even everyday discussions among friends and family. One of the most notable arenas where disputants (争论者) operate is in the courtroom. Here, lawyers act as disputants as they argue on behalf of their clients, presenting evidence and questioning witnesses to establish their case. The judicial system relies on the presence of disputants to ensure that all sides of a story are heard, allowing judges or juries to make informed decisions. Without disputants (争论者), the pursuit of justice would be compromised, as it is through the clash of opposing viewpoints that the truth often emerges. In academia, disputants (争论者) engage in intellectual debates that push the boundaries of knowledge. Scholars often disagree on theories, methodologies, and interpretations of data, leading to vibrant discussions that can result in new insights and advancements in their fields. The presence of disputants is vital for academic growth, as it encourages critical thinking and fosters an environment where ideas can be rigorously tested and refined. Moreover, in everyday life, we encounter disputants (争论者) in our personal relationships. Friends may have differing opinions on a movie, a political issue, or even lifestyle choices. These disagreements can lead to fruitful conversations that strengthen bonds and deepen understanding. However, it is essential for disputants (争论者) to approach these discussions with respect and open-mindedness. When individuals listen to each other and consider different perspectives, they can navigate disputes more effectively and maintain healthy relationships. Despite the importance of disputants (争论者) in various contexts, the process of disputation can sometimes lead to negative outcomes. In heated arguments, emotions can run high, causing individuals to lose sight of the original issue. Personal attacks and hostility can arise, transforming a constructive discussion into a destructive confrontation. It is crucial for disputants (争论者) to recognize when a debate is becoming unproductive and to steer the conversation back to a more civil tone. To be effective disputants (争论者), individuals should cultivate skills such as active listening, empathy, and clear communication. By genuinely trying to understand the other side's perspective, disputants can find common ground and work towards a resolution that satisfies all parties involved. Additionally, employing logical reasoning and factual evidence can strengthen their arguments and enhance the overall quality of the discourse. In conclusion, the role of a disputant (争论者) is multifaceted and plays a crucial part in various aspects of life. Whether in the courtroom, academic settings, or personal relationships, disputants contribute to the richness of dialogue and the pursuit of truth. By approaching disputes with respect and a willingness to listen, disputants can foster understanding and collaboration, ultimately leading to more positive outcomes in their interactions.