disservice

简明释义

英[dɪsˈsɜːvɪs;dɪˈsɜːvɪs]美[dɪsˈsɜːrvɪsˌdɪˈsɜːrvɪs]

n. 伤害；帮倒忙的行为；不亲切的行为；虐待

第 三 人 称 单 数 d i s s e r v i c e s

现 在 分 词 d i s s e r v i c i n g

过 去 式 d i s s e r v i c e d

过 去 分 词 d i s s e r v i c e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Emma Marris's article is an insult and a disservice to the thousands of passionate who work tirelessly to improve the lives of animals and protect our planet.

艾玛·马里斯的文章冒犯、伤害了成千上万的热情工作者，他们不辞辛劳地致力于改善动物的生存处境和保护地球。

2.It's almost a disservice if you have HBO and don't.

它的几乎对不起，如果你有高压氧，并没有这样的规定。

3.My feeling is, I'd be doing my customers a disservice if I let them not buy my product.

我的感觉是如果我不让他们购买我的产品的话我就是在伤害我的顾客。

4.When you let other people diminish you, you do a disservice not only to yourself but to the whole human race.

当你允许别人来影响你，这不仅是对你自己的伤害更是对整个人类的伤害。

5.But it's a disservice to constantly put things in this radical new light - that it's going to change everything.

但要是总把事情套在这种激进的新视角中，就有害无益了——那样将改变一切。

6.We're doing a disservice to our children and grandchildren by saddling them with these debts and no reasonable plan for retiring them.

我们将这些债务负担全部转到我们的后代肩上并且没有任何合理的使他们摆脱债务的计划，这么做是对他们的伤害。

7.They do a great disservice to our society.

他们给我们的社会带来很大危害。

8.Software architects and developers do themselves a disservice when they attribute their success to whatever methodology they have adopted.

但是有一种品质是所有成功的开发者所必备的。

9.But when it comes to a good night's sleep, can these pills do a disservice?

但是想要有一个好的睡眠质量，这些药片会不会帮倒忙？

10.By not addressing the issue, you are doing a great disservice to the team.

通过不解决这个问题，你对团队做了很大的损害。

11.The poor quality of the report is a disservice to our hard work.

报告的低质量对我们的努力是一个损害。

12.If you don't provide accurate information, you will be doing a disservice to your clients.

如果你不提供准确的信息，你将对客户造成损害。

13.Ignoring the feedback from customers is a disservice to the business.

忽视客户的反馈对业务来说是一种损害。

14.He thought he was helping, but his actions were actually a disservice to her.

他以为自己在帮忙，但他的行为实际上对她造成了损害。

作文

In today's world, where information is readily available at our fingertips, the way we communicate and share knowledge has drastically changed. However, with this ease of access comes the potential for misunderstanding and misinformation. One significant issue that arises from this phenomenon is the tendency to do a great disservice (伤害) to ourselves and others by spreading false information or failing to verify facts before sharing them. This disservice (伤害) can have far-reaching consequences, influencing public opinion, shaping societal norms, and even affecting personal relationships. Consider the role of social media in our lives. Platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram allow us to connect with friends, family, and even strangers across the globe. While these platforms can foster positive interactions, they also serve as breeding grounds for rumors and misinformation. When individuals share unverified claims without proper context, they commit a disservice (伤害) not only to their followers but also to the broader community. For example, during a health crisis, sharing unverified medical advice can lead to harmful behaviors that jeopardize public health. Moreover, the disservice (伤害) extends beyond mere misinformation; it can create divisions within society. When people are exposed to biased or misleading information, it can reinforce existing prejudices and foster an environment of distrust. This polarization can make constructive dialogue nearly impossible, as individuals retreat into echo chambers that validate their beliefs while dismissing opposing viewpoints. In this sense, the disservice (伤害) of misinformation is not just about the spread of incorrect facts; it is about the erosion of understanding and empathy among individuals. Education plays a crucial role in combating this disservice (伤害). By teaching critical thinking skills and media literacy, we can empower individuals to discern credible sources from unreliable ones. Schools and educational institutions should prioritize these skills to equip students with the tools they need to navigate the complex landscape of information. When individuals learn to question the validity of the information they encounter, they are less likely to contribute to the disservice (伤害) of misinformation. Furthermore, it is essential for individuals to take responsibility for the information they share. Before hitting the 'share' button, one should pause and consider whether the content is accurate and whether it adds value to the conversation. Engaging in discussions about the importance of fact-checking can help mitigate the disservice (伤害) that comes from hasty sharing. By fostering a culture of accountability, we can collectively reduce the impact of misinformation on our communities. In conclusion, the prevalence of misinformation in our digital age poses a significant challenge that can lead to serious disservice (伤害) to society. Whether through the spread of false health advice, the reinforcement of biases, or the breakdown of constructive dialogue, the consequences are profound. However, by promoting education, critical thinking, and personal accountability, we can combat this disservice (伤害) and work towards a more informed and empathetic society. It is up to each of us to ensure that we contribute positively to our communities rather than adding to the noise of misinformation.

在当今世界，信息触手可及，我们沟通和分享知识的方式发生了巨大的变化。然而，随着这种获取便利而来的，是误解和错误信息的潜在风险。由此现象引发的一个重要问题是，个人往往会通过传播虚假信息或未能在分享之前验证事实，而对自己和他人造成极大的伤害。这种伤害可能具有深远的影响，影响公众舆论，塑造社会规范，甚至影响个人关系。 考虑社交媒体在我们生活中的角色。像Facebook、Twitter和Instagram这样的平台使我们能够与朋友、家人，甚至全球的陌生人联系。虽然这些平台可以促进积极的互动，但它们也成为谣言和错误信息的滋生地。当个人在没有适当背景的情况下分享未经证实的声明时，他们不仅对自己的追随者造成了伤害，还对更广泛的社区造成了伤害。例如，在健康危机期间，分享未经证实的医疗建议可能导致有害行为，从而危及公共健康。 此外，这种伤害不仅仅是错误信息的传播；它还可能在社会中制造分裂。当人们接触到偏见或误导性的信息时，这可能会强化现有的偏见，并营造出不信任的环境。这种两极化可能使建设性的对话几乎变得不可能，因为个人退回到验证其信念的回声室中，同时驳斥对立的观点。从这个意义上说，错误信息的伤害不仅关乎错误事实的传播；它还关乎个体之间理解和同理心的侵蚀。 教育在应对这种伤害方面发挥着至关重要的作用。通过教授批判性思维技能和媒体素养，我们可以赋予个人辨别可信来源和不可靠来源的能力。学校和教育机构应优先考虑这些技能，以装备学生在复杂的信息环境中导航所需的工具。当个人学会质疑他们遇到的信息的有效性时，他们就不太可能对这种伤害作出贡献。 此外，个人对自己分享的信息承担责任是至关重要的。在点击“分享”按钮之前，人们应该停下来考虑内容是否准确，以及它是否为对话增添了价值。就事实核查的重要性进行讨论可以帮助减轻这种伤害。通过培养问责文化，我们可以共同减少错误信息对我们社区的影响。 总之，信息时代错误信息的普遍存在对社会构成了重大挑战，可能导致严重的伤害。无论是通过传播虚假的健康建议、强化偏见，还是破坏建设性对话，其后果都是深远的。然而，通过促进教育、批判性思维和个人问责制，我们可以抗击这种伤害，朝着一个更有见识和同理心的社会迈进。确保我们积极地为我们的社区做出贡献，而不是增加错误信息的噪音，取决于我们每一个人。