duarchy

简明释义

英[ˈdjuːɑːkɪ]美[ˈdjʊɑrki]

n. 二头政治，二人政治

复 数 d u a r c h i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The ancient city was governed by a system of duarchy, where two leaders shared power equally.

这座古城由一种二元统治的制度管理，两位领导人平等分享权力。

2.In a duarchy, decision-making can be both efficient and complicated due to the dual leadership.

在二元统治中，由于双重领导，决策既可以高效又可能复杂。

3.The council decided to adopt a duarchy to better represent the interests of different communities.

理事会决定采用二元统治以更好地代表不同社区的利益。

4.Historically, some city-states operated under a duarchy to balance power among influential families.

历史上，一些城邦在二元统治下运作，以平衡有影响力家庭之间的权力。

5.The duarchy established in the region allowed for more collaborative governance.

该地区建立的二元统治允许更具协作性的治理。

作文

The concept of governance has evolved significantly over the centuries, with various systems emerging to manage societies effectively. One such system is duarchy, which refers to a form of government where two individuals share power equally. This system can be particularly intriguing as it attempts to balance authority and responsibility between two leaders, potentially leading to more collaborative decision-making. In many historical contexts, duarchy has been seen in city-states or regions where two rulers were deemed necessary to maintain stability and address the needs of diverse populations. In ancient Greece, for example, there were instances where two generals would lead an army together, sharing command and making strategic decisions as a team. This practice exemplifies how duarchy can function in a military context, ensuring that different perspectives are considered before crucial actions are taken. The idea behind this system is rooted in the belief that two heads are better than one; by combining their strengths and expertise, the rulers could navigate complex challenges more effectively. However, the effectiveness of a duarchy can vary significantly based on the personalities and compatibility of the leaders involved. When the two rulers share a vision and complement each other's skills, they can create a powerful partnership that fosters innovation and responsiveness to the needs of their constituents. On the other hand, if there is a lack of cohesion or conflicting interests, a duarchy can lead to confusion, inefficiency, and even power struggles, undermining the stability it is meant to provide. Modern examples of duarchy can be found in various organizations and political systems around the world. For instance, in some corporations, co-CEOs share leadership roles, each bringing their unique strengths to the table. This arrangement can be beneficial in fostering a dynamic and adaptable organizational culture. Similarly, in certain political frameworks, dual leadership positions have emerged to address the complexities of governance in multicultural societies, allowing for more inclusive representation. Despite its potential advantages, the duarchy model is not without its challenges. The potential for disagreement between the two leaders can create uncertainty among followers or citizens, leading to questions about who is ultimately in charge. Clear communication and defined roles become essential in such arrangements to ensure that the decision-making process remains transparent and efficient. In conclusion, duarchy offers a fascinating lens through which to examine leadership dynamics. While it presents opportunities for shared governance and collaborative problem-solving, it also requires careful consideration of the individuals involved and their ability to work together harmoniously. As societies continue to evolve, exploring alternative governance structures like duarchy may provide valuable insights into creating more effective and representative systems of leadership. Understanding this concept can enhance our appreciation for the complexities of political systems and the importance of collaboration in leadership roles.

治理的概念随着世纪的发展而显著演变，出现了多种系统以有效管理社会。其中一种系统是duarchy，指的是两个人平等分享权力的政府形式。这种系统尤其引人入胜，因为它试图在两个领导者之间平衡权威和责任，可能导致更具合作性的决策。在许多历史背景中，duarchy曾被视为城市国家或地区的一种必要形式，以维持稳定并满足多样化人群的需求。 例如，在古希腊，曾经有两位将军共同指挥一支军队的情况，他们共同分享指挥权，并作为一个团队做出战略决策。这一做法体现了duarchy在军事背景下的运作方式，确保在采取关键行动之前考虑不同的观点。这个系统背后的理念根植于“两个人的头脑总比一个好”的信念；通过结合他们的优势和专长，统治者可以更有效地应对复杂的挑战。 然而，duarchy的有效性在很大程度上取决于相关领导者的个性和兼容性。当两位统治者共享愿景并互补彼此的技能时，他们能够建立强大的伙伴关系，促进创新和对选民需求的响应。另一方面，如果缺乏凝聚力或存在利益冲突，duarchy可能导致混乱、低效，甚至权力斗争，从而破坏其本应提供的稳定性。 现代的duarchy例子可以在世界各地的各种组织和政治系统中找到。例如，在一些公司中，共同首席执行官分享领导角色，各自带来独特的优势。这种安排有助于培养动态和适应能力强的组织文化。类似地，在某些政治框架中，双重领导职位的出现旨在应对多元文化社会的治理复杂性，从而实现更具包容性的代表性。 尽管具有潜在优势，但duarchy模式并非没有挑战。两位领导者之间的分歧可能在追随者或公民中产生不确定感，导致人们对谁最终负责产生疑问。在这种安排中，清晰的沟通和明确的角色变得至关重要，以确保决策过程保持透明和高效。 总之，duarchy为我们审视领导动态提供了一个引人入胜的视角。虽然它为共享治理和协作解决问题提供了机会，但它也要求我们仔细考虑参与者及其和谐共事的能力。随着社会的不断演变，探索像duarchy这样的替代治理结构可能会为创建更有效和具代表性的领导系统提供宝贵的见解。理解这一概念可以增强我们对政治系统复杂性以及领导角色中合作重要性的认识。