duress

简明释义

英[djuˈres]美[duˈres]

n. 强迫；监禁

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.We come across desperate cases of people who've been returned to Yemen under duress.

我们遇到一些非常绝望的人，他们被强制押回也门境内。

2.To be avoided: When a contract is made under duress, the contract can be avoided by the victimised party.

由于受胁迫而签订的合同，受胁迫一方可以主张无效。

3.At times of duress, they can sound suspiciously like a mobster's "cough up or else" (" or else "meaning severe share-dilution).

在被迫的情形下，增发听起来就像是一个罪犯“被逼供或类似”(“类似”意指严重稀释股权)。

4.Skills come into sharper relief when spouses are under duress.

当配偶们在压力之下时，技能变得更引人注目。

5.And even then, only under duress.

即使这样，只有在胁迫下。

6.He signed the confession under duress.

他出于被迫在供状上签了字。

7.Stuffing something into the session is a very common shortcut taken under duress of an impending deadline.

在最终期限即将来临的压力下，向会话中填充东西是一种常见的捷径。

8.He thought her confession had been made under duress.

他认为她是被迫坦白的。

9.There is a duress here today.

今天这儿有一场监禁。

10.He signed the contract under duress.

他是在胁迫下签署了合同。

11.The confession was obtained through duress, making it inadmissible in court.

该供词是在胁迫下获得的，因此在法庭上不可接受。

12.She felt she had to comply due to duress from her employer.

她觉得由于来自雇主的胁迫，不得不服从。

13.The witness testified that he acted under duress when he committed the crime.

证人作证称他在犯罪时是在胁迫下行动的。

14.They argued that the agreement was invalid because it was made under duress.

他们辩称该协议无效，因为是在胁迫下达成的。

作文

In the realm of law and ethics, the concept of duress plays a critical role in understanding the validity of consent and the nature of free will. Duress refers to a situation where an individual is forced to act against their will due to threats or coercion. This legal term is significant because it highlights the importance of voluntary agreement in contracts and other agreements. When a person enters into a contract under duress, their consent is not considered genuine, which can lead to the contract being voided or deemed unenforceable. To illustrate this, consider a scenario where an individual is threatened with physical harm unless they sign a contract. In such a case, the person’s decision to sign the contract is not made freely; rather, it is a response to the pressure exerted by the threat of violence. This clearly demonstrates how duress undermines the foundational principle of mutual consent in legal agreements. Moreover, duress does not only apply to physical threats. It can also encompass psychological pressure, economic coercion, or any form of undue influence that compromises a person’s ability to make a free choice. For instance, if an employer threatens to terminate an employee's job unless they agree to unfavorable terms in a contract, this situation could also be classified as duress. The employee’s consent, in this case, would not be considered valid because it is obtained through coercive means. The implications of duress extend beyond legal contracts and into everyday life. Many individuals may find themselves in situations where they feel compelled to act against their better judgment due to external pressures. Understanding duress can empower people to recognize when they are being coerced and to seek help or legal recourse when necessary. It serves as a reminder that everyone has the right to make choices without fear of repercussions or intimidation. In addition to its legal implications, duress raises important ethical questions about responsibility and accountability. If a person commits an act under duress, to what extent should they be held accountable for their actions? This question is particularly relevant in criminal law, where defendants may argue that they were compelled to commit a crime due to threats against their life or well-being. Courts often have to weigh the evidence of duress carefully to determine whether it mitigates the defendant's culpability. Ultimately, recognizing the concept of duress is essential for fostering environments where individuals can make decisions freely and without coercion. Whether in personal relationships, professional settings, or legal contexts, the ability to act without duress is fundamental to maintaining autonomy and integrity. It is crucial for society to create systems that protect individuals from coercive pressures and ensure that consent is always given freely and willingly, without fear or intimidation. By doing so, we uphold the values of justice and respect for individual rights, which are cornerstones of a fair and equitable society.

在法律和伦理的领域中，duress的概念在理解同意的有效性和自由意志的性质方面发挥着关键作用。Duress指的是一种情况，在这种情况下，个人因威胁或胁迫而被迫采取与其意愿相反的行动。这个法律术语非常重要，因为它突显了在合同和其他协议中自愿同意的重要性。当一个人在duress下签订合同时，他们的同意不被视为真实的，这可能导致合同被撤销或视为不可执行。 为了说明这一点，考虑一个场景，一个人被威胁如果不签署合同就会遭受身体伤害。在这种情况下，个人签署合同的决定并不是自由做出的；相反，这是对暴力威胁施加的压力的反应。这清楚地表明，duress如何破坏法律协议中互相同意的基础原则。 此外，duress不仅适用于身体威胁。它还可以包括心理压力、经济胁迫或任何形式的不当影响，这些都会妨碍个人做出自由选择的能力。例如，如果雇主威胁要解雇员工，除非他们同意合同中的不利条款，那么这种情况也可以被归类为duress。在这种情况下，员工的同意不会被视为有效，因为它是通过胁迫手段获得的。 Duress的影响不仅限于法律合同，还延伸到日常生活中。许多人可能会发现自己处于被迫采取与其判断相悖的行动的情况，因为外部压力。理解duress可以使人们有能力识别何时受到胁迫，并在必要时寻求帮助或法律救济。它提醒我们，每个人都有权在没有恐惧后果或恐吓的情况下做出选择。 除了法律影响，duress还引发了关于责任和问责的重要伦理问题。如果一个人在duress下实施某个行为，他们应该在多大程度上对自己的行为负责？这个问题在刑法中特别相关，被告可能会辩称，由于对其生命或福祉的威胁，他们被迫犯罪。法院通常必须仔细权衡duress的证据，以确定它是否减轻了被告的罪责。 最终，认识到duress的概念对于促进个人能够自由做出决策而不受胁迫的环境至关重要。无论是在个人关系、职业环境还是法律背景中，能够在没有duress的情况下采取行动是维护自主权和诚信的基础。社会必须建立保护个人免受胁迫压力的系统，确保同意始终是自由和自愿给予的，而不是出于恐惧或恐吓。通过这样做，我们维护了正义和尊重个人权利的价值观，这些都是公平公正社会的基石。