dyarchy

简明释义

英[ˈdaɪɑːkɪ]美[ˈdaɪɑrki]

n. 两头政治（等于 diarchy）

复 数 d y a r c h i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.It introduced a system of dyarchy in the Provinces.

它在各省引入了一种两头政治制。

2.It introduced a system of dyarchy in the Provinces.

它在各省引入了一种两头政治制。

3.The concept of dyarchy 双首制 was implemented to balance power between two governing bodies.

双首制的概念被实施以平衡两个治理机构之间的权力。

4.In a dyarchy 双首制, decisions often require consensus from both leaders, which can slow down the process.

在双首制中，决策通常需要两位领导者的共识，这可能会减缓过程。

5.The ancient kingdom was ruled under a dyarchy 双首制, with one leader managing military affairs and the other overseeing civil matters.

这个古老的王国在双首制下统治，一位领导处理军事事务，另一位则负责民事事务。

6.A dyarchy 双首制 can lead to conflicts if the leaders have differing visions for the future.

如果领导者对未来有不同的愿景，双首制可能会导致冲突。

7.The political system was designed as a dyarchy 双首制 to ensure representation from various factions.

该政治系统被设计为双首制，以确保各派别的代表性。

作文

The concept of dyarchy is often misunderstood in contemporary discussions about governance and political systems. At its core, dyarchy refers to a form of government where two individuals or entities share power equally. This system can be particularly effective in certain contexts, as it allows for a balance of perspectives and responsibilities. One of the most notable examples of dyarchy in history can be found in ancient Rome, where two consuls were elected annually to lead the state. Each consul had the power to veto the other's decisions, which ensured that neither could dominate the other. This system not only fostered cooperation but also encouraged accountability among leaders. In modern times, the idea of dyarchy has resurfaced in various political discussions, especially in contexts where coalition governments are formed. For instance, in some parliamentary systems, two major parties may enter into a coalition agreement, effectively sharing power to govern. This situation can be seen as a contemporary form of dyarchy, where the leaders of both parties must work together to achieve common goals while maintaining their distinct identities. However, the effectiveness of dyarchy can vary greatly depending on the personalities involved and the political culture of the society. In some cases, the collaboration between two leaders can lead to innovative solutions and a more democratic process. On the other hand, if the leaders have conflicting interests or fail to communicate effectively, dyarchy can result in gridlock and inefficiency. Therefore, it is crucial for those in a dyarchy to establish clear communication channels and mutual respect to ensure that their shared governance is successful. Furthermore, the principles of dyarchy can also be applied beyond political systems. For example, in corporate environments, co-CEOs may operate under a dyarchy model, where they share leadership responsibilities. This approach can bring diverse expertise to the table and enhance decision-making processes. However, similar challenges arise in corporate dyarchies, including potential power struggles and the need for alignment on strategic visions. In conclusion, dyarchy is a fascinating and complex governance structure that has implications far beyond its historical roots. Whether in politics or business, the success of a dyarchy depends on the individuals involved and their ability to collaborate effectively. As we continue to explore different forms of governance and leadership, it is essential to recognize the potential benefits and challenges that dyarchy presents. By understanding this system, we can better appreciate the dynamics of shared power and the importance of cooperation in achieving common objectives.

“二元制”这个概念在当代关于治理和政治体系的讨论中常常被误解。其核心是指一种政府形式，其中两个个人或实体平等分享权力。这种制度在某些情况下特别有效，因为它允许不同观点和责任之间的平衡。历史上最显著的“二元制”例子可以在古罗马找到，当时每年选举两位执政官来领导国家。每位执政官都有权否决另一位的决定，这确保了没有一方能够主导另一方。这一制度不仅促进了合作，还鼓励了领导者之间的问责。 在现代， “二元制”这一思想在各种政治讨论中再次浮现，尤其是在形成联合政府的背景下。例如，在一些议会制国家，两大主要政党可能会达成联合协议，有效地共同分享治理权。这种情况可以视为“二元制”的一种现代形式，其中两个政党的领导者必须共同合作以实现共同目标，同时保持各自的独特身份。 然而，“二元制”的有效性在很大程度上取决于参与者的个性和社会的政治文化。在某些情况下，两位领导者之间的合作可以带来创新的解决方案和更民主的过程。另一方面，如果领导者之间存在利益冲突或未能有效沟通，“二元制”可能导致僵局和低效率。因此，对于处于“二元制”中的领导者来说，建立明确的沟通渠道和相互尊重至关重要，以确保他们的共同治理成功。 此外，“二元制”的原则也可以超越政治体系应用。例如，在企业环境中，共同首席执行官可能在“二元制”模式下运作，他们共同承担领导职责。这种方法可以将多样化的专业知识带入决策过程中并增强决策质量。然而，在企业“二元制”中也会出现类似的挑战，包括潜在的权力斗争和在战略愿景上的一致性需求。 总之，“二元制”是一种迷人且复杂的治理结构，其影响远超其历史根源。无论是在政治还是商业中，“二元制”的成功取决于参与者及其有效合作的能力。随着我们继续探索不同形式的治理和领导，我们必须认识到“二元制”所带来的潜在好处和挑战。通过理解这一制度，我们可以更好地欣赏共享权力的动态及合作在实现共同目标中的重要性。