earmarks

简明释义

英[ˈɪə.mɑːks]美[ˈɪr.mɑrks]

n. 专项拨款；耳标；特征（earnmark 的复数）

v. 标以耳号；指定款项等的用途（earmark 的三单形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.John McCain is angry about earmarks in the budget.

约翰·麦凯恩(John McCain)对预算中一些专项拨款[3]怒气冲冲。

2.There will be - let me say it again - there will be no earmarks in this economic recovery plan.

让我再说一遍，在经济复苏计划中，不会有任何特别拨款。

3.Now, some of these earmarks support worthy projects in our local communities.

现在，部分专项拨款支撑着当地社会的一些有价值的项目。

4.Earmarks attract plenty of bad press, but the money is trivial-less than 0.5% of federal spending.

新闻媒体对指定拨款嗤之以鼻，但其数目却无足轻重——少于联邦支出的0.5%。

5.Estimates of the cost of "earmarks" in the legislation vary.

对这项议案中的专项拨款的所需费用做出的估算不同。

6.She has all the earmarks of a superstar.

她具备超级明星的一切特征。

7.Now, some of these earmarks support worthyprojects in our local communities.

当然，这些专款有一部分是的的确确支持了我们的社区建设。

8.And we've put in place higher standards of transparency by putting as much information as possible on earmarks. gov.

而且还通过将更多信息公布在earmarks .gov网站上，为增加透明度设立了更高的标准。

9.This earmarks a lump sum of $8 billion, plus $1 billion a year, to help construct fast rail corridors around America (see map).

为了建设环美快速干线（如图所示），该计划将得到一笔80亿美元的财政拨款，这些钱每年会有10亿到帐。

10.The government allocated funds for education, with specific earmarks 专项拨款 for underprivileged schools.

政府为教育拨款，对贫困学校进行了特定的earmarks 专项拨款。

11.Many organizations rely on earmarks 专项拨款 to ensure their projects receive necessary funding.

许多组织依赖于earmarks 专项拨款来确保他们的项目获得必要的资金。

12.The senator proposed new earmarks 专项拨款 for infrastructure improvements in rural areas.

参议员提议为农村基础设施改善提供新的earmarks 专项拨款。

13.Nonprofits often seek earmarks 专项拨款 from the government to support their missions.

非营利组织通常寻求政府的earmarks 专项拨款以支持他们的使命。

14.The budget included earmarks 专项拨款 for environmental conservation projects.

预算中包含了用于环境保护项目的earmarks 专项拨款。

作文

In the realm of government spending and budgeting, the term earmarks refers to specific allocations of funds designated for particular projects or purposes. These allocations are often included in larger budget bills and are intended to ensure that certain initiatives receive the financial support they need. Understanding the concept of earmarks is essential for comprehending how public funds are distributed and utilized across various sectors, including education, healthcare, and infrastructure. The use of earmarks has been a topic of considerable debate among policymakers and the public. Proponents argue that earmarks allow legislators to direct funding toward projects that are vital for their constituents, thereby addressing local needs more effectively. For instance, a senator representing a rural area might secure earmarks for road improvements or community health services, which can significantly enhance the quality of life for residents. This targeted approach can lead to tangible benefits within communities, fostering development and growth. On the other hand, critics of earmarks contend that they can lead to inefficiencies and misuse of taxpayer money. They argue that when funds are allocated without a competitive bidding process, it opens the door for favoritism and corruption. Instead of prioritizing projects based on merit, earmarks may be awarded based on political connections or lobbying efforts. This concern has led to calls for greater transparency and accountability in the earmarking process. Moreover, the practice of earmarks can contribute to the overall complexity of the federal budget. When numerous earmarks are included in budget proposals, it can become challenging for lawmakers to assess the effectiveness and necessity of each allocation. This complexity can hinder informed decision-making and complicate the budgeting process, making it difficult to track how public funds are being spent. In recent years, some legislative bodies have moved to ban or limit the use of earmarks in an effort to streamline the budgeting process and reduce wasteful spending. However, this shift has not come without its own set of challenges. Without earmarks, local projects may struggle to secure funding, leading to disparities in resource allocation across different regions. The absence of targeted funding can exacerbate existing inequalities, particularly in underfunded areas that rely heavily on federal support. As citizens, it is crucial to stay informed about how earmarks are used and the implications they have for our communities. Engaging in discussions about government spending and advocating for transparency can help ensure that public funds are utilized effectively and equitably. Ultimately, the goal should be to strike a balance between providing necessary funding for local projects while maintaining accountability and efficiency in the budgeting process. In conclusion, earmarks play a significant role in shaping the landscape of government funding. While they can provide essential support for local initiatives, they also raise important questions about transparency, accountability, and the efficient use of taxpayer dollars. By understanding the complexities surrounding earmarks, we can better navigate the intricacies of public finance and advocate for policies that benefit all citizens.

在政府支出和预算的领域中，术语earmarks指的是特定的资金分配，专门用于特定的项目或目的。这些分配通常包含在较大的预算法案中，旨在确保某些倡议获得所需的财政支持。理解earmarks的概念对于理解公共资金如何在各个部门（包括教育、医疗保健和基础设施）之间分配和利用至关重要。 earmarks的使用一直是政策制定者和公众讨论的热点话题。支持者认为，earmarks使立法者能够将资金直接引导到对其选民至关重要的项目上，从而更有效地满足当地需求。例如，代表农村地区的参议员可能会为道路改善或社区健康服务争取earmarks，这可以显著提高居民的生活质量。这种有针对性的方法可以在社区内带来切实的利益，促进发展和增长。 另一方面，earmarks的批评者则认为，这可能导致效率低下和纳税人资金的滥用。他们认为，当资金分配没有竞争性招标过程时，就会为偏袒和腐败打开大门。资金的优先分配可能基于政治关系或游说努力，而不是基于项目的优劣。这一担忧导致了对耳标过程更大透明度和问责制的呼声。 此外，earmarks的做法可能会增加联邦预算的整体复杂性。当预算提案中包含大量earmarks时，立法者可能难以评估每项分配的有效性和必要性。这种复杂性可能妨碍知情决策，并使预算过程复杂化，从而使追踪公共资金的使用变得困难。 近年来，一些立法机构已开始禁止或限制earmarks的使用，以努力简化预算过程并减少浪费性支出。然而，这一转变也面临着一系列挑战。在没有earmarks的情况下，当地项目可能难以获得资金，从而导致不同地区资源分配的不平衡。缺乏有针对性的资金可能加剧现有的不平等，特别是在严重缺乏资金的地区，这些地区在很大程度上依赖联邦支持。 作为公民，了解earmarks的使用及其对我们社区的影响至关重要。参与有关政府支出的讨论并倡导透明度可以帮助确保公共资金得到有效和公平的利用。最终，目标应该是在为地方项目提供必要资金的同时，保持预算过程中的问责制和效率之间取得平衡。 总之，earmarks在塑造政府资金格局中发挥着重要作用。虽然它们可以为地方倡议提供必要的支持，但也引发了有关透明度、问责制和纳税人资金有效使用的重要问题。通过理解围绕earmarks的复杂性，我们可以更好地驾驭公共财政的复杂性，并倡导有利于所有公民的政策。