eisegesis

简明释义

英[/ˌaɪsɪˈdʒiːsɪs/]美[/ˌaɪsɪˈdʒiːsɪs/]

n. 牵强附会；肆意诠释

复 数 e i s e g e s e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.So eisegesis,you're taught to avoid that.

所以你们要避免肆意诠释。

2.So eisegesis,you're taught to avoid that.

所以你们要避免肆意诠释。

3.Many scholars criticize the author's approach as eisegesis, interpreting the text through a personal lens rather than its intended meaning.

许多学者批评作者的做法是引入解释，通过个人视角解读文本，而不是其本意。

4.In theological discussions, eisegesis can lead to misinterpretations of scripture.

在神学讨论中，引入解释可能导致对圣经的误解。

5.Critics argue that the film's director employed eisegesis to inject modern themes into a classic story.

批评者认为这部电影的导演采用了引入解释，将现代主题注入经典故事。

6.The professor warned against eisegesis when analyzing historical texts, emphasizing the importance of context.

教授警告在分析历史文本时要避免引入解释，强调上下文的重要性。

7.Some readers engage in eisegesis by projecting their own beliefs onto the narrative.

一些读者通过将自己的信仰投射到叙事中，参与了引入解释。

作文

In the realm of biblical interpretation, the term eisegesis refers to the process of interpreting a text by introducing one's own ideas and biases into it, rather than deriving meaning from the text itself. This practice contrasts sharply with exegesis, which aims to uncover the original meaning intended by the author. The distinction between these two approaches is crucial for anyone engaging in serious study of religious texts or literature. eisegesis can lead to misinterpretations that stray far from the intended message, often reflecting more about the interpreter's perspective than the actual content of the scripture. To illustrate this concept, consider a popular biblical passage: "For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future" (Jeremiah 29:11). An individual practicing eisegesis might interpret this verse as a promise of financial success or personal happiness, projecting their desires onto the text. This interpretation ignores the historical and contextual factors surrounding the passage, which was originally addressed to the Israelites in exile, offering them hope amidst their suffering rather than a blanket promise of prosperity. The dangers of eisegesis extend beyond personal interpretation; they can influence entire communities and lead to widespread misconceptions. For instance, sermons that rely heavily on eisegesis may create a congregation that believes in a distorted view of faith, one that prioritizes individual desires over communal responsibility and ethical living. This can lead to a faith that is self-centered rather than serving others, which contradicts many core teachings found within various religious traditions. Moreover, eisegesis can be particularly prevalent in contemporary society, where individuals often seek validation for their existing beliefs rather than challenging them. Social media platforms amplify this tendency, allowing people to share interpretations that resonate with their views without rigorous scrutiny. The echo chamber effect can reinforce erroneous beliefs, creating a cycle of misunderstanding that is difficult to break. In academic settings, scholars strive to avoid eisegesis by engaging in thorough research and employing critical thinking skills. They analyze the historical context, linguistic nuances, and cultural background of the text to arrive at a more accurate understanding. This method promotes a deeper appreciation for the material and encourages readers to engage with the text on its own terms. In conclusion, while eisegesis may provide immediate comfort or affirmation, it ultimately undermines the integrity of the text being interpreted. By recognizing the potential pitfalls of this approach, individuals can cultivate a more authentic understanding of the scriptures and literary works they encounter. Embracing exegesis instead allows for a richer engagement with the material, fostering a deeper connection to the themes and messages that are truly present within the text. As we navigate our interpretations, let us strive to be mindful of the difference between eisegesis and exegesis, ensuring that our readings reflect the true essence of the words we seek to understand.

eisegesis在圣经解读领域中，指的是通过将自己的想法和偏见引入文本来解释文本的过程，而不是从文本本身推导出意义。这种做法与旨在揭示作者原意的释经相对立。这两种方法之间的区别对于任何参与宗教文本或文学研究的人来说都是至关重要的。eisegesis可能导致误解，偏离原本的含义，往往反映出解释者的视角而非经文的实际内容。 为了说明这个概念，可以考虑一个流行的圣经段落：“因为我知道我对你们的计划，耶和华说：是使你们亨通，不使你们受害，是给你们希望和未来的计划”（耶利米书29:11）。一个实践eisegesis的人可能会将这节经文解释为财务成功或个人幸福的承诺，将自己的愿望投射到文本上。这种解释忽略了围绕这一段落的历史和背景因素，该段落最初是针对被放逐的以色列人，向他们提供希望，而不是对繁荣的普遍承诺。 eisegesis的危险不仅限于个人解释；它们还可以影响整个社区并导致广泛的误解。例如，过度依赖eisegesis的讲道可能会创造出一个相信扭曲信仰观念的会众，这种信仰优先考虑个人愿望，而非共同责任和道德生活。这可能导致一种以自我为中心的信仰，而不是服务他人，这与各种宗教传统中的许多核心教义相悖。 此外，eisegesis在当代社会中特别普遍，个人常常寻求对现有信念的验证，而不是挑战它们。社交媒体平台加剧了这种倾向，使人们能够分享与自己观点一致的解释，而无需进行严格审查。回音室效应可以强化错误信念，形成难以打破的误解循环。 在学术环境中，学者们努力避免eisegesis，通过进行深入研究和运用批判性思维技能。他们分析文本的历史背景、语言细微差别和文化背景，以得出更准确的理解。这种方法促进了对材料的更深层次欣赏，并鼓励读者以文本本身的名义进行互动。 总之，虽然eisegesis可能提供即时的安慰或确认，但最终会削弱被解释文本的完整性。通过认识到这种方法的潜在陷阱，个人可以培养对所接触的经文和文学作品的更真实理解。相反地，拥抱释经能够让我们更丰富地参与材料，促进我们与文本中真正存在的主题和信息的更深联系。当我们导航我们的解释时，让我们努力意识到eisegesis和释经之间的区别，确保我们的阅读反映出我们寻求理解的词语的真实本质。