electable

简明释义

英[ɪˈlektəbl]美[ɪˈlektəbl]

adj. 有候选资格的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Last year, when conservatives were searching desperately for someone both solidly conservative and electable, Mr Thompson's name came up.

去年，当保守派们不顾一切地寻找既坚定保守又具有当选可能的人选，他们选中了汤普森先生。

2.Last year, when conservatives were searching desperately for someone both solidly conservative and electable, Mr Thompson's name came up.

去年，当保守派们不顾一切地寻找既坚定保守又具有当选可能的人选，他们选中了汤普森先生。

3.This paragraph will need to be revised if activities in Article 3, paragraph 4, continue to be electable .

如第三条第4款中的活动仍然可选，本段将需作修改。

4.That attitude used to be the mark of not just an honourable but an electable senator.

这种态度在过去不仅意味着他是一个正直的参议员，而且还是一个理应当选的参议员。

5.Clinton's youthful image made him an extremely electable candidate.

克林顿年轻的形象使他成为极可能当选的候选人。

6.The party believes that their candidate is the most electable 可选的 choice for the upcoming election.

该党认为他们的候选人是即将到来的选举中最可选的选择。

7.Voters are looking for someone who is not only qualified but also electable 可选的 in their eyes.

选民正在寻找一个不仅有资格而且在他们眼中也是可选的人选。

8.Many candidates have dropped out of the race because they felt they were not electable 可选的 enough.

许多候选人退出了竞选，因为他们觉得自己不够可选的。

9.The committee is focused on finding a more electable 可选的 candidate for the general election.

委员会专注于为普选找到一个更可选的候选人。

10.Her charisma and experience make her highly electable 可选的 among the voters.

她的魅力和经验使她在选民中非常可选的。

作文

In the realm of politics, the term electable refers to a candidate's perceived ability to win an election. This concept is crucial not only for political parties but also for voters who seek representatives that can effectively advocate for their interests. The notion of being electable often dictates the strategies employed by candidates and the choices made by party leaders during primaries and general elections. Candidates deemed electable tend to possess certain characteristics that resonate with a broad audience. These traits may include charisma, relatability, and a clear understanding of the issues that matter most to voters. For instance, a candidate who can connect with the electorate on a personal level, addressing their concerns about healthcare, education, and economic stability, is more likely to be viewed as electable. Moreover, the political landscape plays a significant role in determining who is considered electable. In a highly polarized environment, candidates who can appeal to both sides of the aisle may have a better chance of being successful. This means that a moderate stance on contentious issues can enhance a candidate's electability. However, this approach often comes with its own set of challenges, as candidates risk alienating their core supporters while trying to attract undecided voters. The media also influences perceptions of electable candidates. Coverage of a candidate’s campaign can shape public opinion, highlighting strengths and weaknesses that may not be apparent to the average voter. A candidate who receives positive media attention may be seen as more electable, while one who faces scrutiny may struggle to gain traction, regardless of their actual qualifications or policies. Furthermore, the concept of electability can lead to strategic voting among party members. During primary elections, voters may choose to support a candidate they believe has the best chance of winning the general election, rather than the one whose policies they most align with. This phenomenon can sometimes result in the selection of candidates who are less representative of the party's base, as voters prioritize the likelihood of victory over ideological alignment. However, the idea of electability is not without its criticisms. Some argue that it perpetuates a cycle where only certain types of candidates are given serious consideration, often sidelining those who may bring fresh perspectives or represent marginalized groups. This can lead to a lack of diversity within political representation, as the focus remains on traditional notions of what makes a candidate electable. In conclusion, the term electable encapsulates the complex interplay between a candidate's qualities, the political environment, media influence, and voter behavior. Understanding what makes a candidate electable is essential for both aspiring politicians and engaged citizens. As elections approach, it is vital for voters to look beyond the superficial traits of electable candidates and consider the policies and values they stand for. Ultimately, a truly electable candidate should not only be capable of winning but also committed to serving the best interests of their constituents, fostering a government that truly reflects the will of the people.

在政治领域，术语electable指的是候选人被认为有能力赢得选举的能力。这个概念对政党和寻求有效代表自身利益的选民来说都至关重要。成为electable的观念通常决定了候选人所采用的策略以及党领导人在初选和大选期间所做的选择。 被认为是electable的候选人往往具备某些特征，这些特征与广泛受众产生共鸣。这些特质可能包括魅力、可亲近性以及对选民最关心的问题的清晰理解。例如，能够与选民在个人层面上建立联系、关注他们对医疗保健、教育和经济稳定的担忧的候选人，更可能被视为electable。 此外，政治环境在决定谁被认为是electable方面也起着重要作用。在高度两极化的环境中，能够吸引两边选民的候选人可能更有成功的机会。这意味着在争议问题上的温和立场可以增强候选人的electability。然而，这种方法往往伴随着一系列挑战，因为候选人冒着疏远核心支持者的风险，同时试图吸引未决选民。 媒体也影响着对electable候选人的看法。对候选人竞选活动的报道可以塑造公众舆论，突出一些选民可能并不明显的优缺点。获得积极媒体关注的候选人可能被视为更具electable性，而遭受审查的候选人可能面临困难，无论他们的实际资格或政策如何。 此外，electability的概念可能导致政党成员之间的战略投票。在初选中，选民可能会选择支持他们认为在大选中胜算最大的候选人，而不是与自己政策最一致的人。这种现象有时会导致选择那些不太能代表党内基础的候选人，因为选民优先考虑胜利的可能性而非意识形态的一致性。 然而，electability的观念并非没有批评意见。一些人认为这助长了一种循环，使得只有某些类型的候选人受到认真考虑，常常将那些可能带来新视角或代表边缘群体的人排除在外。这可能导致政治代表性缺乏多样性，因为焦点仍然集中在传统的electable候选人的定义上。 总之，术语electable概括了候选人素质、政治环境、媒体影响和选民行为之间复杂的相互作用。理解什么使候选人成为electable对有志于从政的人和参与公民而言都是至关重要的。随着选举的临近，选民必须超越electable候选人的表面特征，考虑他们所支持的政策和价值观。最终，真正的electable候选人不仅应该能够赢得选举，还应致力于服务于其选民的最佳利益，促进一个真正反映人民意愿的政府。