eliminative

简明释义

英[ɪˌlɪmɪˈneɪtɪv]美[ɪˈlɪmɪneɪtɪv]

删去的

消除的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The generality is significant and it can be found primarily in the following aspects: strict and sloppy interpretation ambiguity, locality effect and the eliminative effect.

其共性突出表现在严格与松散释义歧义、局部性效应、淘汰效应等方面。

2.The generality is significant and it can be found primarily in the following aspects: strict and sloppy interpretation ambiguity, locality effect and the eliminative effect.

其共性突出表现在严格与松散释义歧义、局部性效应、淘汰效应等方面。

3.The text introduces constant faults along with case study and relevant eliminative methods about auto reinforcement drum-type halt vehicle brake system of light car.

介绍了轻型汽车自动增力鼓式驻车制动系统常见故障现象，原因分析及相应的排除方法。

4.The new software update includes an eliminative feature that removes unnecessary files.

这次软件更新包含一个消除的功能，可以删除不必要的文件。

5.In the study, researchers proposed an eliminative approach to reduce biases in data collection.

在这项研究中，研究人员提出了一种消除的方法，以减少数据收集中的偏差。

6.The team focused on developing an eliminative strategy to enhance customer satisfaction.

团队专注于制定一种消除的策略，以提高客户满意度。

7.Their eliminative method for solving the problem proved to be highly effective.

他们的消除的解决问题的方法被证明非常有效。

8.The eliminative steps taken during the audit helped identify several areas of improvement.

审计过程中采取的消除的步骤帮助识别了多个改进领域。

作文

In the realm of philosophy and cognitive science, the concept of eliminative materialism has sparked considerable debate. This theory posits that our common-sense understanding of mental states—such as beliefs, desires, and intentions—should be rejected in favor of a more scientific approach to understanding the mind. Advocates of this view argue that many of our everyday psychological concepts are not only inaccurate but also unnecessary. They believe that as neuroscience advances, we will find that these concepts can be entirely eliminative (消除的) and replaced with a more precise understanding of brain processes. One of the most compelling arguments for the eliminative (消除的) perspective comes from the observation that many mental phenomena once thought to be fundamental have been successfully explained away by scientific inquiry. For instance, the notion of 'phlogiston' was once a widely accepted theory in chemistry, only to be eliminated with the advent of modern chemical science. Similarly, proponents of eliminative materialism suggest that concepts like 'belief' and 'desire' may eventually be seen as outdated remnants of a pre-scientific worldview. Critics of eliminative (消除的) materialism argue that it fails to account for the subjective experiences of individuals. They contend that even if our understanding of the brain improves, the rich tapestry of human experience cannot be fully captured by mere neurological terms. Emotions, thoughts, and consciousness encompass dimensions that are inherently qualitative and subjective, which might resist reduction to purely physical explanations. Moreover, the implications of adopting an eliminative (消除的) stance extend beyond academic discourse; they touch upon moral and ethical considerations. If our traditional concepts of mental states are deemed obsolete, how do we navigate issues of responsibility, accountability, and agency? For instance, if someone commits a crime, understanding their actions through the lens of a purely biological framework could lead to a diminished sense of personal responsibility. This raises profound questions about justice and societal norms. Despite these challenges, the pursuit of a more scientifically grounded understanding of the mind remains a captivating endeavor. The potential for breakthroughs in neuroscience to reshape our understanding of consciousness is both exciting and daunting. As we continue to explore the intricate workings of the brain, the possibility of an eliminative (消除的) perspective gaining traction cannot be dismissed. In conclusion, while the idea of eliminative (消除的) materialism presents a radical shift in how we conceptualize mental states, it invites us to reconsider the foundations of our understanding of the mind. As science progresses, we may find ourselves at a crossroads where the traditional language of psychology is replaced by a new lexicon rooted in biology. Whether this transition will ultimately enhance or hinder our grasp of human experience remains an open question, one that warrants further exploration and dialogue among philosophers, scientists, and the public alike.

在哲学和认知科学领域，消除唯物主义的概念引发了相当大的争论。该理论认为，我们对心理状态（如信念、欲望和意图）的常识理解应该被拒绝，以便采用更科学的方法来理解心智。该观点的支持者认为，我们日常的心理概念不仅不准确，而且也是不必要的。他们相信，随着神经科学的发展，我们将发现这些概念可以完全消除（eliminative），并被对大脑过程的更精确理解所取代。 支持消除（eliminative）观点的一个最有说服力的论点来自于观察到许多曾被认为是基本的心理现象已经通过科学探究成功地被解释掉。例如，“火焰素”的概念曾是化学中广泛接受的理论，随着现代化学科学的出现而被淘汰。同样，消除唯物主义的支持者建议，像“信念”和“欲望”这样的概念最终可能会被视为过时的前科学世界观的残余。 批评消除（eliminative）唯物主义的人则认为，它未能考虑个体的主观体验。他们主张，即使我们对大脑的理解有所改善，人类经验的丰富性也无法完全通过纯粹的神经术语来捕捉。情感、思想和意识包含了固有的定性和主观维度，这些可能抵制被简化为纯粹的物理解释。 此外，采纳消除（eliminative）立场的影响超越了学术讨论，它涉及道德和伦理的考量。如果我们传统的心理状态概念被认为是过时的，我们如何处理责任、问责和代理等问题？例如，如果某人犯罪，通过纯生物学的框架理解他们的行为可能会导致个人责任感的减弱。这引发了关于正义和社会规范的深刻问题。 尽管面临这些挑战，追求对心智更科学基础的理解仍然是一项迷人的事业。神经科学突破重塑我们对意识理解的潜力既令人兴奋又令人生畏。随着我们继续探索大脑的复杂运作，消除（eliminative）观点获得更多关注的可能性不容忽视。 总之，虽然消除（eliminative）唯物主义的思想呈现出一种根本性的转变，改变了我们对心理状态的概念，但它邀请我们重新考虑我们对心智理解的基础。随着科学的进步，我们可能会发现自己处于一个十字路口，传统的心理学语言被根植于生物学的新词汇所取代。这一转变最终是否会增强或阻碍我们对人类经验的理解仍然是一个悬而未决的问题，值得哲学家、科学家和公众进一步探索和对话。