embracery

简明释义

英[ɪmˈbreɪsəri]美[ɪmˈbresəri]

n. 试图笼络陪审员

复 数 e m b r a c e r i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The judge dismissed the case due to the evidence of embracery.

法官因证据显示存在胁迫而驳回了案件。

2.The lawyer was disbarred for engaging in embracery during the trial.

该律师因在审判中参与胁迫而被取消执业资格。

3.Witnesses were intimidated, which led to accusations of embracery.

证人受到威胁，这导致了对胁迫的指控。

4.The defense argued that the jury was subjected to embracery by outside influences.

辩方辩称，陪审团受到外部影响的胁迫。

5.In cases of embracery, the integrity of the legal system is at risk.

在胁迫的情况下，法律系统的完整性面临风险。

作文

In the realm of law and justice, the term embracery refers to a form of jury tampering, where an individual attempts to influence or sway the opinions of jurors in a case. This unethical practice can undermine the integrity of the judicial process and lead to unjust outcomes. Understanding embracery is crucial for anyone interested in the legal system, as it highlights the importance of impartiality in jury duty and the potential consequences when this principle is compromised. The concept of embracery can be traced back to historical cases where individuals or groups sought to manipulate jurors through various means, such as bribery, coercion, or undue persuasion. Such actions not only violate the law but also erode public trust in the legal system. When jurors are influenced by external factors, the verdicts rendered may not reflect the true facts of the case, leading to wrongful convictions or acquittals. In a democratic society, the right to a fair trial is a fundamental principle that ensures justice is served. The integrity of the jury system is a cornerstone of this principle, which is why embracery is taken very seriously by legal authorities. Jurors are expected to base their decisions solely on the evidence presented in court, free from outside influences. However, instances of embracery remind us that this ideal is not always upheld. To illustrate the impact of embracery, consider a hypothetical case where a wealthy individual attempts to sway a jury by offering them financial incentives. If jurors accept these bribes, their ability to deliver a fair verdict is compromised. This not only affects the parties involved in the case but also sets a dangerous precedent for future trials. The ripple effects of embracery can extend beyond the courtroom, affecting public perception of the legal system and diminishing the sense of justice within the community. Preventing embracery requires vigilance and ethical standards from all participants in the judicial process. Lawyers, judges, and jurors must be aware of the tactics used to influence juries and actively work to combat them. Legal education plays a vital role in this regard, as aspiring lawyers are taught about the implications of embracery and the importance of maintaining the sanctity of the jury system. Moreover, legal systems have implemented strict penalties for those found guilty of embracery. These penalties serve as a deterrent against such behavior and emphasize the seriousness of the offense. By holding individuals accountable for their actions, the legal system aims to protect the integrity of jury trials and uphold the principles of justice. In conclusion, embracery is a significant issue that poses a threat to the fairness and integrity of the judicial process. By understanding its implications and working to prevent it, we can help ensure that justice is served in a manner that is both fair and impartial. As members of society, it is our responsibility to advocate for a legal system that upholds these values and protects the rights of all individuals. Through education, awareness, and strict enforcement of laws against embracery, we can contribute to a more just and equitable society.

在法律和正义的领域中，术语embracery指的是一种陪审团干扰行为，即个人试图影响或左右案件陪审员的意见。这种不道德的行为可能破坏司法程序的完整性，并导致不公正的结果。理解embracery对任何对法律体系感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它突显了陪审责任中公正性的重要性，以及当这一原则受到侵犯时可能产生的后果。 embracery的概念可以追溯到历史上那些个人或团体试图通过各种手段，如贿赂、胁迫或不当劝说来操纵陪审员的案例。这些行为不仅违反法律，还会侵蚀公众对法律体系的信任。当陪审员受到外部因素的影响时，作出的裁决可能无法反映案件的真实情况，导致错误定罪或无罪释放。 在民主社会中，公正审判的权利是确保实现正义的基本原则。陪审团制度的完整性是这一原则的基石，这就是为什么embracery受到法律当局的高度重视。陪审员应仅根据法庭上提供的证据做出决定，免受外部影响。然而，embracery的实例提醒我们，这一理想并不总是得到维护。 为了说明embracery的影响，考虑一个假设的案例，其中一位富有的个人试图通过向陪审员提供财务激励来影响陪审团。如果陪审员接受这些贿赂，他们做出公正裁决的能力就会受到损害。这不仅影响案件相关方，而且为未来的审判设定了危险的先例。embracery的涟漪效应可以超越法庭，影响公众对法律系统的看法，并削弱社区内的正义感。 防止embracery需要所有司法过程参与者的警惕和道德标准。律师、法官和陪审员必须意识到影响陪审团的策略，并积极努力与之作斗争。法律教育在这方面发挥着至关重要的作用，因为未来的律师被教导关于embracery的影响以及维护陪审团制度神圣性的重要性。 此外，法律系统对被判定犯有embracery的人实施了严格的惩罚。这些惩罚作为对这种行为的威慑，强调了该罪行的严重性。通过追究个人的责任，法律系统旨在保护陪审团审判的完整性，并维护正义原则。 总之，embracery是一个重大问题，对司法程序的公正性和完整性构成威胁。通过理解其影响并努力防止它，我们可以帮助确保以公正和公正的方式实现正义。作为社会的一员，我们有责任倡导一个维护这些价值观并保护所有个人权利的法律系统。通过教育、意识和严格执行反对embracery的法律，我们可以为建立一个更加公正和平等的社会做出贡献。