empanelling
简明释义
记入名簿上
选任(陪审员)(empanel 的现在分词)
英英释义
为审判选择和组成陪审团的过程。 |
单词用法
陪审团的选定 | |
选定小组 | |
陪审团选定说明 | |
选定委员会 | |
选定权威机构 | |
负责选定的法官 |
同义词
陪审团选择 | The process of empanelling a jury is crucial for a fair trial. | 陪审团的选拔过程对公正审判至关重要。 | |
陪审团召集 | Jury selection can take several days, depending on the case. | 陪审团选择可能需要几天时间,具体取决于案件。 |
反义词
解除 | 审判结束后,陪审团被解除。 | ||
解散 | The judge decided to dismiss the case due to lack of evidence. | 法官因证据不足决定解散此案。 |
例句
1.The procedure of liquidation in inheritance includes the empanelling of the supervisors, proclaiming the creditors, formulating the accounting bill of heritage and the assignment of heritage.
遗产清算程序包括遗产管理人的选任、公告权利人、制定遗产清册及遗产分配四个阶段。
2.The procedure of liquidation in inheritance includes the empanelling of the supervisors, proclaiming the creditors, formulating the accounting bill of heritage and the assignment of heritage.
遗产清算程序包括遗产管理人的选任、公告权利人、制定遗产清册及遗产分配四个阶段。
3.The judge began the process of empanelling a jury for the high-profile case.
法官开始为这起引人注目的案件进行陪审团的选拔。
4.During the empanelling phase, potential jurors were questioned about their backgrounds.
在陪审团的选拔阶段,潜在的陪审员被询问他们的背景。
5.The lawyer challenged several candidates during the empanelling process.
律师在陪审团的选拔过程中对几名候选人提出了质疑。
6.After empanelling, the jury was instructed on their duties.
在完成陪审团的选拔后,陪审团被告知他们的职责。
7.The empanelling of juries is a crucial step in ensuring a fair trial.
陪审团的选拔是确保公正审判的重要步骤。
作文
In the legal system, the process of selecting a jury is known as empanelling. This crucial step ensures that a fair and impartial jury is assembled to hear a case. The concept of empanelling dates back centuries and serves as a cornerstone of the judicial process in many democratic societies. During empanelling, potential jurors are summoned from the community, and their qualifications are assessed through a series of questions posed by the judge and attorneys involved in the case. This process aims to identify any biases or conflicts of interest that might affect a juror's ability to render an impartial verdict. The significance of empanelling cannot be overstated. A well-empanelled jury reflects the diversity of the community and helps ensure that different perspectives are considered during deliberations. For instance, if a jury is composed solely of individuals from a particular demographic, it may lead to a skewed understanding of the case at hand. Therefore, the goal of empanelling is to create a balanced jury that can deliberate fairly based on the evidence presented. During the empanelling process, attorneys have the opportunity to challenge potential jurors. These challenges can be either for cause, where a specific reason is provided for disqualifying a juror, or peremptory, where no reason is required. The ability to challenge jurors is a critical aspect of ensuring that the final jury is unbiased and representative of the community. Moreover, the empanelling stage also involves educating jurors about their responsibilities. Jurors are instructed on the importance of confidentiality, the need to avoid outside influences, and the requirement to base their decisions solely on the evidence presented in court. This education is vital, as it prepares jurors to fulfill their roles effectively and uphold the integrity of the judicial process. In recent years, discussions surrounding empanelling have gained traction, particularly regarding the representation of minority groups within juries. Many advocates argue that systemic biases exist in the empanelling process, leading to underrepresentation of certain demographics. Efforts are being made to reform these practices to ensure that juries reflect the communities they serve more accurately. Additionally, technology has begun to play a role in the empanelling process. Some jurisdictions are exploring digital platforms to streamline the selection of jurors and improve the efficiency of the process. This modernization could potentially enhance transparency and accessibility, allowing a broader range of individuals to participate in jury service. In conclusion, empanelling is a fundamental aspect of the judicial system that plays a critical role in maintaining fairness and justice. By carefully selecting jurors who can approach a case without bias, the legal system upholds the principle of a fair trial. As society evolves, so too must the practices surrounding empanelling, ensuring that they remain relevant and equitable for all members of the community.
在法律系统中,选择陪审团的过程被称为empanelling。这个关键步骤确保了一个公正和无偏见的陪审团被组建来审理案件。empanelling的概念可以追溯到几个世纪前,是许多民主社会司法过程的基石。在empanelling过程中,潜在的陪审员从社区中召集,并通过法官和案件相关律师提出的一系列问题来评估他们的资格。这个过程旨在识别任何可能影响陪审员公正裁决能力的偏见或利益冲突。 empanelling的重要性不容小觑。一个良好组成的陪审团反映了社区的多样性,有助于确保在审议过程中考虑到不同的观点。例如,如果陪审团仅由特定人群的个体组成,可能会导致对案件的偏颇理解。因此,empanelling的目标是创建一个平衡的陪审团,使其能够根据提出的证据进行公正的审议。 在empanelling过程中,律师有机会挑战潜在的陪审员。这些挑战可以是有原因的,即提供具体理由以使陪审员失去资格,或是无理由的,即无需提供理由。挑战陪审员的能力是确保最终陪审团无偏见且代表社区的关键方面。 此外,empanelling阶段还涉及对陪审员进行责任教育。陪审员被告知保密的重要性、避免外部影响的必要性,以及仅根据法庭上提出的证据做出决定的要求。这种教育至关重要,因为它为陪审员有效履行职责并维护司法过程的完整性做好准备。 近年来,围绕empanelling的讨论逐渐增多,特别是关于陪审团中少数群体代表性的问题。许多倡导者认为,在empanelling过程中存在系统性偏见,导致某些人群的代表性不足。正在努力改革这些做法,以确保陪审团更准确地反映他们所服务的社区。 此外,科技已经开始在empanelling过程中发挥作用。一些司法管辖区正在探索数字平台,以简化陪审员的选择并提高过程的效率。这种现代化可能会增强透明度和可及性,使更多的人能够参与陪审服务。 总之,empanelling是司法系统的一个基本方面,在维护公平和正义方面发挥着关键作用。通过仔细选择能够无偏见地处理案件的陪审员,法律系统维护了公正审判的原则。随着社会的发展,围绕empanelling的实践也必须不断演变,以确保它们对所有社区成员保持相关性和公平性。
文章标题:empanelling的意思是什么
文章链接:https://www.liuxue886.cn/danci/349252.html
本站文章均为原创,未经授权请勿用于任何商业用途
发表评论