epagoge

简明释义

英[ˌɛpəˈɡoʊdʒ]美[ˌɛpəˈɡoʊdʒ]

n. 归纳论证

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In the thesis literature analysis method, epagoge, graphology, comparative method and mathematical modeling are used for the related question.

针对论文要解决的问题，充分运用了文献分析法、归纳法、图表法、比较法、数学建模等多种研究方法。

2.In the thesis literature analysis method, epagoge, graphology, comparative method and mathematical modeling are used for the related question.

针对论文要解决的问题，充分运用了文献分析法、归纳法、图表法、比较法、数学建模等多种研究方法。

3.In his argument, he employed the technique of epagoge to draw a general conclusion from specific instances.

在他的论证中，他运用了归纳法的技巧，从具体实例中得出一般结论。

4.The teacher explained that epagoge is often used in scientific reasoning to formulate hypotheses.

老师解释说，归纳法常用于科学推理中来制定假设。

5.Using epagoge, she was able to infer the rules of the game from observing a few rounds.

通过使用归纳法，她能够从观察几轮比赛中推断出游戏规则。

6.In literature, authors often utilize epagoge to build themes based on character experiences.

在文学中，作者常常利用归纳法根据角色经历构建主题。

7.The detective relied on epagoge to connect the dots between various clues.

侦探依靠归纳法将各种线索联系起来。

作文

In the realm of logic and reasoning, the term epagoge refers to a method of reasoning that moves from specific instances to general conclusions. This inductive form of logic is crucial for developing theories and understanding phenomena in various fields, including science, philosophy, and everyday decision-making. For example, when a scientist observes that a particular chemical reaction occurs under certain conditions multiple times, they may use epagoge to conclude that this reaction will likely occur under similar circumstances in the future. This inductive reasoning allows us to formulate hypotheses and build knowledge based on empirical evidence. The concept of epagoge is not only limited to scientific inquiry; it also plays a significant role in our daily lives. When we make decisions based on past experiences or observations, we are employing epagoge. For instance, if someone has had several positive experiences with a specific brand of coffee, they might infer that all products from that brand will be of high quality. This reasoning helps individuals navigate choices and predict outcomes based on prior knowledge. However, while epagoge can lead to valid conclusions, it is essential to recognize its limitations. Inductive reasoning does not guarantee certainty; instead, it offers probable conclusions based on the evidence available. For instance, just because a person has seen many swans that are white does not mean that all swans are white. This limitation highlights the importance of remaining open to new information and being willing to revise our conclusions in light of contrary evidence. In philosophy, epagoge has been a topic of discussion among scholars who analyze the nature of knowledge and belief. The works of Aristotle, for instance, delve into the nuances of inductive reasoning and its implications for understanding reality. Aristotle argued that epagoge is foundational for acquiring knowledge, as it enables individuals to derive general principles from specific observations. This philosophical perspective emphasizes the significance of experience and observation in shaping our understanding of the world. Moreover, epagoge is often contrasted with deductive reasoning, which starts with general premises and leads to specific conclusions. While deductive reasoning provides certainty when the premises are true, it lacks the exploratory nature of epagoge. Both forms of reasoning are essential in different contexts, and understanding their interplay can enhance critical thinking skills. In conclusion, the term epagoge encapsulates a vital aspect of human reasoning, allowing us to draw general conclusions from specific instances. It is a powerful tool for knowledge acquisition and decision-making, though it comes with inherent limitations that necessitate careful consideration. By recognizing the role of epagoge in various domains, from science to philosophy and everyday life, we can better appreciate the complexities of reasoning and the pursuit of understanding. As we navigate an increasingly complex world, honing our inductive reasoning skills through epagoge can empower us to make informed decisions and foster a deeper comprehension of the phenomena around us.

在逻辑和推理的领域中，术语epagoge指的是一种从特定实例推导出一般结论的推理方法。这种归纳形式的逻辑对于在科学、哲学以及日常决策等多个领域发展理论和理解现象至关重要。例如，当科学家观察到在某些条件下某种化学反应多次发生时，他们可以利用epagoge推断这种反应在未来也可能会在类似情况下发生。这种归纳推理使我们能够基于实证证据制定假设并构建知识。 epagoge的概念不仅限于科学探究，它在我们的日常生活中也扮演着重要角色。当我们根据过去的经验或观察做出决策时，我们正在运用epagoge。例如，如果某人对特定品牌的咖啡有过几次积极的体验，他们可能会推断该品牌的所有产品质量都很高。这种推理帮助个人在选择时导航，并根据已有知识预测结果。 然而，尽管epagoge可以导致有效的结论，但认识到它的局限性是至关重要的。归纳推理并不保证确定性；相反，它提供了基于可用证据的可能结论。例如，仅仅因为一个人看到许多天鹅是白色的，并不意味着所有天鹅都是白色的。这一局限性突显了对新信息保持开放态度的重要性，以及愿意在面对相反证据时修正我们的结论。 在哲学中，epagoge一直是学者们讨论的主题，他们分析知识和信念的本质。例如，亚里士多德的著作深入探讨了归纳推理的细微差别及其对理解现实的影响。亚里士多德认为，epagoge是获取知识的基础，因为它使个体能够从具体观察中推导出一般原则。这一哲学视角强调了经验和观察在塑造我们对世界理解中的重要性。 此外，epagoge常常与演绎推理形成对比，后者从一般前提出发并得出具体结论。尽管当前提为真时，演绎推理提供了确定性，但它缺乏epagoge的探索性。两种推理形式在不同的上下文中都至关重要，理解它们之间的相互作用可以增强批判性思维能力。 总之，术语epagoge概括了人类推理的一个重要方面，使我们能够从特定实例中得出一般结论。这是获取知识和做出决策的强大工具，尽管它伴随着固有的局限性，需要仔细考虑。通过认识到epagoge在科学、哲学和日常生活等各个领域的作用，我们可以更好地欣赏推理的复杂性和对理解的追求。当我们在日益复杂的世界中航行时，通过epagoge磨练我们的归纳推理能力，可以使我们更有能力做出明智的决策，并加深对周围现象的理解。