ephors

简明释义

英[ˈɛfɔrz]美[ˈɛfɔrz]

n. 监察官（ephor 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.So, you mustthink of them, not as distinguished people who have some clout in their ownperson, but ordinary people who only achieve what clout they're going to haveby virtue of being chosen as ephors.

因此，你也肯定认为他们不像卓越的人一样在自己的人们中间有强大的影响力，但是普通人只要能够达到可以被选为监督官的道德水准就可以了。

2.So, you mustthink of them, not as distinguished people who have some clout in their ownperson, but ordinary people who only achieve what clout they're going to haveby virtue of being chosen as ephors.

因此，你也肯定认为他们不像卓越的人一样在自己的人们中间有强大的影响力，但是普通人只要能够达到可以被选为监督官的道德水准就可以了。

3.So, ifthe ephors wanted to do something, it would be damn foolish not to clear itwith the gerousia first; although if they wished to be reckless, they could dootherwise.

因此，监督官如果想做点什么事情，他们没有首先清楚地告知长老会议，那他们肯定就傻到家了；当然，如果他们愿意不计后果，那么他们可以这样做。

4.He says that the ephors are often very poor, and therefore easy to bribe;

他说监察官往往是非常之穷，所以很容易受贿赂；

5.Now, another thing about the ephors is that they're very different.

现在说另外一点，监督官们情况十分不同。

6.In ancient Sparta, the power of the government was shared between the kings and the ephors.

在古代斯巴达，政府的权力由国王和五人执政官共享。

7.The ephors were responsible for overseeing the education of Spartan youth.

这些五人执政官负责监督斯巴达青少年的教育。

8.Each year, five ephors were elected to serve in the Spartan government.

每年，五名五人执政官被选举进入斯巴达政府。

9.The authority of the ephors extended to matters of war and peace.

这些五人执政官的权力延伸到战争与和平事务。

10.The ephors held the kings accountable for their actions.

这些五人执政官使国王对其行为负责。

作文

In ancient Sparta, the governance structure was unique and complex, characterized by a system that included a group of five officials known as ephors. The term ephors refers to these elected leaders who held significant power in the Spartan political system. They were responsible for various administrative functions and served as a check on the authority of the kings. This duality of power was essential in maintaining the balance within Spartan society, ensuring that no single individual could dominate the political landscape. The role of the ephors was crucial, particularly in their oversight of the education and upbringing of Spartan youth. They were tasked with ensuring that the agoge, the rigorous training program for young boys, adhered to the strict standards set by Spartan law. This focus on discipline and military readiness was fundamental to the Spartan way of life, and the ephors played a pivotal role in shaping the future warriors of Sparta. Moreover, the ephors had the authority to summon the assembly of citizens and could propose legislation, which further emphasized their influence in the political sphere. Their ability to oversee the kings and hold them accountable was a remarkable aspect of Spartan governance. For instance, if a king acted against the interests of the state, the ephors could intervene and even bring charges against him. This mechanism ensured that the monarchy was not absolute and that the rule of law prevailed in Sparta. The election of the ephors occurred annually, reflecting the democratic elements present in Spartan society. This practice allowed for a rotation of leadership, preventing the consolidation of power among a select few individuals. Each ephor was expected to act in the best interest of the state, prioritizing the welfare of the citizens over personal ambitions. Their term lasted only one year, which meant they had to be effective and decisive in their decisions, knowing that their time in office was limited. The legacy of the ephors extends beyond their immediate historical context. Their model of shared power and accountability can be seen as a precursor to modern democratic principles. In contemporary governance, the idea of checks and balances is paramount, echoing the functions performed by the ephors in ancient Sparta. The lessons learned from their system can inform current discussions about leadership, responsibility, and the importance of diverse voices in decision-making processes. In conclusion, the ephors were more than just officials in a historical context; they represented a critical component of Spartan society that balanced power and maintained order. Their influence on education, governance, and accountability serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in leadership and the necessity of checks within any political system. Understanding the role of the ephors provides valuable insights into the dynamics of power and the enduring relevance of their principles in today's world.

在古斯巴达，治理结构独特而复杂，特点是包括一群五名官员，称为ephors。术语ephors指的是这些被选举的领导者，他们在斯巴达政治体系中拥有重要的权力。他们负责各种行政职能，并作为国王权威的制衡。这种权力的双重性在维护斯巴达社会的平衡方面至关重要，确保没有单一个体可以主导政治格局。 ephors的角色至关重要，特别是在他们监督斯巴达青年教育和成长方面。他们负责确保阿戈格（agoge）——这一严格的青少年训练项目遵循斯巴达法律所设定的严格标准。对纪律和军事准备的关注是斯巴达生活方式的基础，而ephors在塑造斯巴达未来战士方面发挥了关键作用。 此外，ephors有权召集公民大会，并可以提出立法，这进一步强调了他们在政治领域的影响力。他们监督国王并使其负责的能力是斯巴达治理的一个显著方面。例如，如果国王的行为损害国家利益，ephors可以介入，甚至对他提出指控。这一机制确保了君主制不是绝对的，法律的统治在斯巴达盛行。 ephors的选举每年进行一次，反映了斯巴达社会中存在的民主元素。这一做法允许领导权的轮换，防止少数人集中权力。每位ephor都被期望以国家的最佳利益为重，将公民的福祉置于个人野心之上。他们的任期仅为一年，这意味着他们必须在决策中有效且果断，意识到他们在职时间有限。 ephors的遗产超越了他们直接的历史背景。他们的权力共享和问责模式可以视为现代民主原则的前身。在当代治理中，制衡的理念至关重要，回响着古斯巴达ephors所执行的职能。从他们的制度中获得的教训可以为当前关于领导、责任和决策过程中多样化声音的重要性讨论提供参考。 总之，ephors不仅仅是历史背景下的官员；他们代表了斯巴达社会的一个关键组成部分，平衡权力并维持秩序。他们对教育、治理和问责的影响提醒我们领导中涉及的复杂性以及任何政治体系中制衡的必要性。理解ephors的角色为我们提供了对权力动态的宝贵见解，以及他们原则在当今世界的持久相关性。