epistemically

简明释义

英[ɪˈpɪstəmɪkli]美[ɪˈpɪstəˌmɪkli]

adv. 认识地；与认识有关地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.philprof: Kant's theory of the noumenal and phenomenal can be interpreted either metaphysically or epistemically.

哲学系教授：康德的本体与认识学说即能从形而上学的角度解释，也能从认识论的角度解释。

2.philprof: Kant's theory of the noumenal and phenomenal can be interpreted either metaphysically or epistemically.

哲学系教授：康德的本体与认识学说即能从形而上学的角度解释，也能从认识论的角度解释。

3.The researchers approached the problem epistemically to better understand the underlying theories.

研究人员从认识论上入手，以更好地理解潜在理论。

4.In the debate, she argued that knowledge should be evaluated epistemically rather than emotionally.

在辩论中，她认为知识应该从认识论上而不是情感上进行评估。

5.The course focuses on how we acquire knowledge epistemically through various sources.

这门课程关注我们如何通过各种来源认识论地获取知识。

6.He examined the historical texts epistemically to discern their validity.

他从认识论的角度审视这些历史文本，以辨别其有效性。

7.The philosopher discussed the implications of knowing something epistemically versus intuitively.

哲学家讨论了从认识论上知道某事与直觉上知道某事的含义。

作文

In the realm of philosophy, the concept of knowledge is often dissected into various categories and frameworks. One particularly intriguing aspect is how we understand knowledge epistemically (从知识论的角度). To explore this, we must first define what it means to know something. Knowledge can be seen as justified true belief, but this definition has been challenged over the years. The philosopher Edmund Gettier presented scenarios that showed how one could have justified true belief without actually possessing knowledge. This brings us to the importance of examining our beliefs and their foundations epistemically (从知识论的角度). When we consider the sources of our knowledge, we realize that they can vary greatly. Some knowledge comes from empirical evidence, while other knowledge may stem from intuition or authority. For instance, scientific knowledge is typically derived from observation and experimentation, which provides a strong epistemic foundation. However, when we accept claims based on authority, such as a teacher or a textbook, we must be cautious. This reliance on authority can lead to epistemic complacency if we do not critically evaluate the information being presented epistemically (从知识论的角度). Moreover, the digital age has transformed how we acquire knowledge. With the internet at our fingertips, we have access to a vast amount of information. However, this abundance can also lead to misinformation and confusion. It becomes essential to assess the credibility of our sources epistemically (从知识论的角度). We must develop skills to differentiate between reliable and unreliable information, fostering a more robust understanding of the world around us. Furthermore, the social dimensions of knowledge cannot be overlooked. Our beliefs are often influenced by societal norms and cultural contexts. This raises the question of whether knowledge is universally applicable or if it is context-dependent. Understanding knowledge epistemically (从知识论的角度) requires us to consider these social factors and how they shape our perceptions. For example, what is accepted as knowledge in one culture may be viewed differently in another. Thus, engaging with knowledge requires a critical and reflective approach, allowing us to grasp its complexities. In conclusion, to navigate the complexities of knowledge, we must engage with it epistemically (从知识论的角度). This involves questioning our beliefs, evaluating our sources, and recognizing the influence of cultural contexts. By doing so, we can cultivate a deeper understanding of what it means to know and how we can apply this knowledge responsibly in our lives. As we continue to seek knowledge in an ever-changing world, maintaining an epistemic awareness will empower us to make informed decisions and contribute positively to society.

在哲学领域，知识的概念常常被分解成各种类别和框架。一个特别引人入胜的方面是我们如何从知识论的角度（epistemically）理解知识。为了探讨这一点，我们首先必须定义知道某事意味着什么。知识可以被视为有理由的真实信念，但这个定义多年来一直受到挑战。哲学家埃德蒙·盖提提出了一些情境，显示一个人可以拥有有理由的真实信念而实际上并不具备知识。这使我们认识到，从知识论的角度（epistemically）审视我们的信念及其基础的重要性。 当我们考虑知识的来源时，我们意识到它们可能大相径庭。一些知识来自经验证据，而其他知识可能源于直觉或权威。例如，科学知识通常源自观察和实验，这提供了一个强有力的知识基础。然而，当我们基于权威接受主张时，比如老师或教科书，我们必须保持警惕。这种对权威的依赖如果不对所呈现的信息进行批判性评估，可能会导致知识论的懈怠（epistemic complacency）。 此外，数字时代改变了我们获取知识的方式。随着互联网触手可及，我们可以访问大量信息。然而，这种丰富性也可能导致错误信息和混乱。因此，从知识论的角度（epistemically）评估我们来源的可信度变得至关重要。我们必须培养区分可靠和不可靠信息的能力，以促进对周围世界更强的理解。 此外，知识的社会维度也不容忽视。我们的信念往往受社会规范和文化背景的影响。这引发了一个问题：知识是否具有普遍适用性，还是依赖于上下文。从知识论的角度（epistemically）理解知识要求我们考虑这些社会因素以及它们如何塑造我们的认知。例如，一个文化中被接受为知识的内容，在另一个文化中可能会被不同地看待。因此，参与知识的探讨需要一种批判性和反思性的方式，使我们能够掌握其复杂性。 总之，为了应对知识的复杂性，我们必须从知识论的角度（epistemically）与之互动。这涉及到质疑我们的信念、评估我们的来源，并认识到文化背景的影响。通过这样做，我们可以培养对什么是知识以及如何负责任地应用这种知识的更深刻理解。随着我们在不断变化的世界中继续寻求知识，保持一种知识意识将使我们能够做出明智的决策，并积极地为社会做出贡献。