eristic

简明释义

英[eˈrɪstɪk]美[eˈrɪstɪk]

adj. 争论的，辩论的；旨在诡辩的

n. 辩论者；辩论术；争辩

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.For the calibration in high temperature, the K which is re-lated to the reciprocal of sensitivity C of the sensor is adopted as charat-eristic factor, which brings convenience to users.

在高温标定时，采用与传感器灵敏度C有倒数关系的K 值作为传感器的特征系数，给使用者带来方便。

2.For the calibration in high temperature, the K which is re-lated to the reciprocal of sensitivity C of the sensor is adopted as charat-eristic factor, which brings convenience to users.

在高温标定时，采用与传感器灵敏度C有倒数关系的K 值作为传感器的特征系数，给使用者带来方便。

3.The debate turned into an eristic 争论的 exchange, with both sides more interested in winning than in finding the truth.

辩论变成了一场争论的争论的交流，双方更关心胜利而非寻找真相。

4.His eristic 争论的 style often alienated potential collaborators.

他那种争论的争论的风格常常使潜在的合作者感到疏远。

5.In class, her eristic 争论的 approach sparked lively discussions among students.

在课堂上，她的争论的争论的方式引发了学生们的热烈讨论。

6.The lawyer's eristic 争论的 tactics were effective but left a bad taste in the jury's mouth.

律师的争论的争论的策略很有效，但给陪审团留下了不好的印象。

7.They engaged in an eristic 争论的 dialogue that seemed to go nowhere.

他们进行了一场争论的争论的对话，似乎毫无进展。

作文

In the realm of debates and discussions, the term eristic refers to a style of argumentation that is primarily focused on winning rather than seeking the truth. This approach often involves employing clever rhetoric, emotional appeals, and sometimes even fallacies to outmaneuver an opponent. While eristic tactics can be effective in persuading an audience or gaining a temporary advantage in a debate, they can also lead to a breakdown in meaningful dialogue and understanding. Consider a typical political debate where candidates engage in eristic exchanges. Instead of addressing the actual issues at hand, they might resort to personal attacks or misrepresentations of each other's positions. This not only alienates voters who are genuinely seeking solutions but also fosters a culture of animosity and division. The focus shifts from constructive conversation to a contest of who can score the most points, leaving the audience confused about the real issues. Moreover, the eristic nature of some arguments can manifest in everyday conversations. For example, during a family discussion about financial decisions, one member might use eristic tactics by exaggerating the consequences of not following their advice, thereby pressuring others into agreement. This kind of manipulation can create resentment and hinder open communication, as individuals may feel their perspectives are not valued. The dangers of eristic discourse extend beyond personal relationships into broader societal implications. When public figures and media outlets prioritize eristic strategies, it can contribute to misinformation and polarization. Audiences may become more entrenched in their beliefs, dismissing any information that contradicts their views. This phenomenon is particularly evident in social media, where sensationalism often trumps factual reporting, leading to a landscape filled with eristic arguments that thrive on outrage rather than reason. To counteract the negative effects of eristic argumentation, it is crucial for individuals to cultivate critical thinking skills and prioritize civil discourse. Engaging in discussions with a genuine intent to understand differing viewpoints can help create a more respectful and productive environment. When participants in a conversation focus on collaboration instead of competition, they are more likely to arrive at informed conclusions and foster mutual respect. In conclusion, while eristic tactics may provide short-term victories in debates, they ultimately undermine the quality of discourse and hinder true understanding. By recognizing the characteristics of eristic arguments and striving for constructive dialogue, we can contribute to a healthier and more informed society. It is essential to remember that the goal of any discussion should not merely be to win but to learn, grow, and connect with others. Only then can we hope to bridge divides and foster a more inclusive community where ideas can flourish without the overshadowing influence of eristic rhetoric.

在辩论和讨论的领域中，术语eristic指的是一种主要关注赢得而非寻求真理的论证风格。这种方法通常涉及运用巧妙的修辞、情感诉求，有时甚至是谬误，以超越对手。虽然eristic策略在说服观众或在辩论中获得暂时优势方面可能有效，但它们也会导致有意义的对话和理解的破裂。 考虑一个典型的政治辩论，其中候选人进行eristic交流。候选人们可能会诉诸于人身攻击或对彼此立场的歪曲，而不是解决实际问题。这不仅使那些真正寻找解决方案的选民感到疏离，而且还助长了敌意和分裂的文化。焦点从建设性的对话转向谁能得分更多的竞赛，留下观众对真实问题的困惑。 此外，eristic性质的一些论点可以在日常对话中表现出来。例如，在家庭讨论财务决策时，一名成员可能通过夸大不遵循其建议的后果来使用eristic策略，从而迫使其他人同意。这种操控可能会造成怨恨，阻碍开放的沟通，因为个人可能会觉得自己的观点没有被重视。 eristic话语的危险不仅限于个人关系，还扩展到更广泛的社会影响。当公众人物和媒体优先考虑eristic策略时，可能会导致错误信息和极化。观众可能会更加固守自己的信念，拒绝任何与其观点相悖的信息。这种现象在社交媒体上尤为明显，耸人听闻的报道往往胜过事实报告，导致充斥着以愤怒为生的eristic论点的环境。 为了抵消eristic论证的负面影响，个人必须培养批判性思维能力，并优先考虑文明的对话。以真正理解不同观点的意图参与讨论，可以帮助创造一个更尊重和富有成效的环境。当对话中的参与者关注合作而非竞争时，他们更有可能得出明智的结论，促进相互尊重。 总之，尽管eristic策略在辩论中可能提供短期胜利，但它们最终会削弱话语的质量，妨碍真正的理解。通过识别eristic论点的特征并努力进行建设性对话，我们可以为一个更健康、更有见识的社会做出贡献。重要的是要记住，任何讨论的目标不应仅仅是获胜，而是学习、成长和与他人建立联系。只有这样，我们才能希望弥合分歧，培养一个更具包容性的社区，让思想在没有eristic修辞影响的情况下蓬勃发展。