estop

简明释义

英[ɪˈstɒp]美[eˈstɑːp]

vt. 禁止翻供；禁止；禁止反言

n. （Estop）人名；（西）埃斯托普

第 三 人 称 单 数 e s t o p s

现 在 分 词 e s t o p p i n g

过 去 式 e s t o p p e d

过 去 分 词 e s t o p p e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.That is, he might be able to prevent, or "estop," you from using that argument as a defense, because of his reliance on your actions.

也就是说，他也许能“禁止(你)翻供”，或防止你利用这场争端作为防卫，由于他对你行为的依赖。

2.That is, he might be able to prevent, or "estop," you from using that argument as a defense, because of his reliance on your actions.

也就是说，他也许能“禁止(你)翻供”，或防止你利用这场争端作为防卫，由于他对你行为的依赖。

3.Please estop making excuses. I know the score and I know you are to blame.

别找借口了，我知道是怎么回事，我也知道这件事应该怪你。

4.Please estop talking.

请停止讲话。

5.Please estop your continual questions.

请不要再接二连三地提问题了。

6.The court can estop (阻止) the defendant from denying his previous statements.

法庭可以阻止被告否认他之前的陈述。

7.If you have accepted the terms, you cannot estop (阻止) the company from enforcing them later.

如果你已经接受了条款，你不能阻止公司之后强制执行这些条款。

8.The principle of estoppel can estop (阻止) a party from making contradictory claims.

禁止反言原则可以阻止一方提出矛盾的主张。

9.They tried to estop (阻止) the landlord from evicting them after they paid the rent.

他们试图阻止房东在他们支付租金后驱逐他们。

10.The judge ruled that the plaintiff was estopped (被阻止) from claiming damages due to prior agreements.

法官裁定原告因先前协议而被阻止索赔。

作文

In the realm of law and contracts, the term estop holds significant importance. To estop someone means to prevent them from asserting a claim or a fact due to their previous actions or statements. This legal principle is crucial in ensuring fairness and justice in various transactions. For instance, consider a scenario where a person sells a property and explicitly states that there are no existing liens on it. If the buyer relies on this statement and later discovers a lien, the seller may be estopped from claiming otherwise because they made a representation that the buyer relied upon. This prevents the seller from benefiting from their misleading statement, upholding the integrity of the transaction. The concept of estop is often seen in cases involving equitable estoppel, which arises when one party has relied on the representations or promises of another party to their detriment. For example, if a landlord verbally assures a tenant that they can stay in the property for an extended period, and the tenant makes significant investments in the property based on this assurance, the landlord may be estopped from evicting the tenant without notice. This principle protects the tenant from being unfairly disadvantaged due to the landlord's prior assurances. Moreover, estop can also apply in the context of judicial proceedings. A party may be estopped from re-litigating an issue that has already been decided in court. This is known as 'collateral estoppel.' For instance, if a court has ruled on the validity of a contract, the parties involved cannot argue about that same contract's validity in a future case. This ensures consistency in the legal system and prevents parties from wasting judicial resources by revisiting settled issues. Understanding the implications of estop is essential for anyone involved in legal matters, whether as a professional or a layperson. It emphasizes the importance of honesty and integrity in communications and transactions. When parties engage in negotiations or agreements, they must be aware that their statements and actions carry weight and can have lasting consequences. The principle of estop serves as a reminder that one cannot simply retract statements or claims without facing potential repercussions. In conclusion, the term estop encapsulates a vital legal doctrine that promotes fairness and accountability in various interactions. By preventing individuals from contradicting their previous statements or actions, the law seeks to protect those who rely on the representations made to them. Whether in real estate transactions, contractual agreements, or court proceedings, understanding the concept of estop helps ensure that justice is served and that individuals act responsibly in their dealings with others.

在法律和合同的领域中，术语estop具有重要意义。estop某人意味着由于他们之前的行为或陈述，阻止他们主张某个索赔或事实。这个法律原则在确保各种交易的公平和正义方面至关重要。例如，考虑一个场景，一个人出售一处财产，并明确表示没有任何现有的留置权。如果买方依赖于这一声明，后来发现有留置权，卖方可能会被estopped，因为他们做出了买方依赖的陈述。这防止了卖方因其误导性声明而获益，维护了交易的诚信。 estop的概念通常出现在涉及衡平法禁止反言的案件中，当一方依赖于另一方的陈述或承诺而受到损害时，就会产生这种情况。例如，如果房东口头保证租户可以在物业中居住一段时间，而租户基于这一保证对物业进行了重大投资，则房东可能会被estopped，不得在未通知的情况下驱逐租户。这个原则保护了租户，避免因房东之前的保证而遭受不公正的劣势。 此外，estop也可以适用于司法程序的背景。一方可能会被estopped，不能重新诉讼已经在法庭上裁定过的问题。这被称为“附带禁止反言”。例如，如果法院已裁定合同的有效性，相关方就不能在未来的案件中争论该合同的有效性。这确保了法律系统的一致性，并防止当事方通过重提已解决的问题浪费司法资源。 理解estop的含义对于任何参与法律事务的人来说都是至关重要的，无论是作为专业人士还是普通人。它强调了沟通和交易中诚实与诚信的重要性。当各方进行谈判或协议时，他们必须意识到自己的陈述和行为具有分量，可能会产生持久的后果。estop原则提醒人们，一个人不能简单地撤回陈述或索赔，而不面临潜在的后果。 总之，术语estop概括了一个促进各种互动中公平和问责的重要法律原则。通过阻止个人与其之前的陈述或行为相矛盾，法律旨在保护那些依赖于向他们做出的陈述的人。无论是在房地产交易、合同协议还是法庭程序中，理解estop的概念都有助于确保正义的实现，并促使个人在与他人打交道时负责任。