eugenic

简明释义

英[juːˈdʒenɪk]美[juːˈdʒenɪk]

adj. 优种的；优生学的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Eugenic question of gene.

基因优生问题。

2.In China today each couple is required to strictly carry out a eugenic plan.

在今天的中国，要求每对夫妇都要严格执行优生计划。

3.Pan's eugenic research and probed the research methods used in his study. At the same time the defects of his theory were also pointed out.

第五部分总结了潘氏优生学的研究方法和理论特色，同时也指出了其理论和观点中的缺陷与不足。

4.Eugenic policies were first implemented in the early 1900s in the United States.

优生政策最先是在二十世纪初在美国开始实施。

5.If it is I will listen to doctors, the most important eugenic!

如果是我，一定会听医生的，优生最重要了！

6.In China today each couple is required to carry out a eugenic plan strictly.

在今天的中国要求每对夫妇都要严格执行优生计划。

7.The debate over eugenic practices has been ongoing for decades.

关于优生学实践的辩论已经持续了几十年。

8.Some countries have imposed eugenic policies in the past to control population genetics.

一些国家在过去实施了优生学政策以控制人口遗传。

9.The concept of eugenic selection raises ethical questions in modern medicine.

在现代医学中，优生学选择的概念引发了伦理问题。

10.Many argue that eugenic practices can lead to discrimination against certain groups.

许多人认为，优生学实践可能导致对某些群体的歧视。

11.The history of eugenic movements is often tied to human rights abuses.

历史上的优生学运动常常与侵犯人权的行为有关。

作文

The concept of eugenic practices has been a topic of intense debate and controversy throughout history. At its core, eugenic refers to the science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics. This idea, while seemingly rooted in the desire for human advancement, raises significant ethical questions and concerns about human rights. The origins of eugenic thought can be traced back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when scientists and social reformers proposed that society could be improved through selective reproduction. Prominent figures like Francis Galton, who coined the term eugenic, believed that intelligence and other traits could be inherited and thus enhanced through careful selection of parents. However, the application of eugenic principles has often led to horrific consequences. In the early 20th century, many countries implemented eugenic policies that included forced sterilizations and marriage restrictions aimed at those deemed 'unfit' to reproduce. These actions were often justified by pseudoscientific claims about race and ability, leading to widespread discrimination and human rights abuses. The most notorious example of eugenic ideology is found in Nazi Germany, where the regime sought to create a 'master race' through brutal measures, including genocide. In contemporary discussions, the legacy of eugenic practices serves as a warning against the misuse of genetic science. Advances in genetics and biotechnology have reignited interest in the potential for eugenic interventions, such as gene editing and prenatal screening. While these technologies hold promise for preventing genetic disorders, they also pose ethical dilemmas. For instance, the possibility of designing 'designer babies' raises questions about societal inequality and the definition of what constitutes a 'desirable' trait. Moreover, the historical context of eugenic practices reminds us of the moral responsibility that comes with scientific advancements. It is crucial that society engages in open dialogue about the implications of eugenic ideas and practices, ensuring that we do not repeat the mistakes of the past. Education about the dangers of eugenic ideologies can help foster a more inclusive and ethical approach to genetics and reproductive rights. In conclusion, while the pursuit of improving human health and capabilities is a noble goal, it must be approached with caution and a strong ethical framework. The term eugenic carries with it a heavy historical burden, reminding us of the potential for science to be misused. As we navigate the complexities of modern genetics, we must prioritize human dignity and equality, ensuring that our efforts to enhance humanity do not compromise our fundamental values. Only by learning from the past can we hope to shape a future that respects all individuals, regardless of their genetic makeup.

‘优生’这一概念在历史上一直是一个备受争议的话题。从本质上讲，‘优生’指的是通过控制繁殖来改善人类种群，以增加可遗传特征的出现。这个想法虽然看似源于对人类进步的渴望，但却引发了重大伦理问题和人权担忧。‘优生’思想的起源可以追溯到19世纪末和20世纪初，当时科学家和社会改革者提出，通过选择性繁殖可以改善社会。像弗朗西斯·高尔顿这样的杰出人物创造了‘优生’这一术语，他认为智力和其他特征可以遗传，因此可以通过精心选择父母来增强。 然而，‘优生’原则的应用往往导致可怕的后果。在20世纪初，许多国家实施了‘优生’政策，包括强迫绝育和对被认为‘不适合’繁殖的人的婚姻限制。这些行为常常以伪科学的种族和能力论据为基础，导致广泛的歧视和人权侵犯。‘优生’意识形态最臭名昭著的例子是在纳粹德国，那个政权试图通过残酷手段创造‘优越种族’，包括种族灭绝。 在当代讨论中，‘优生’实践的遗产提醒我们要警惕基因科学的误用。遗传学和生物技术的进步重新点燃了对‘优生’干预潜力的兴趣，例如基因编辑和产前筛查。虽然这些技术在预防遗传疾病方面具有希望，但它们也带来了伦理困境。例如，设计‘定制婴儿’的可能性引发了关于社会不平等和什么构成‘理想’特征的定义的问题。 此外，‘优生’实践的历史背景提醒我们，科学进步伴随着道德责任。社会必须就‘优生’思想和实践的影响进行开放对话，确保我们不会重蹈覆辙。关于‘优生’意识形态危险的教育可以帮助促进对遗传学和生殖权利更具包容性和伦理的方法。 总之，尽管改善人类健康和能力的追求是一项崇高的目标，但必须谨慎对待，并建立强大的伦理框架。‘优生’这一术语承载着沉重的历史负担，提醒我们科学被误用的潜力。在我们应对现代遗传学的复杂性时，我们必须优先考虑人类尊严和平等，确保我们增强人类的努力不会损害我们的基本价值观。只有从过去学习，我们才能希望塑造一个尊重所有个体的未来，无论他们的基因组成如何。