euthanize

简明释义

英[ˈjuːθənaɪz]美[ˈjuːθənaɪz]

vt. 使安乐死；对……施无痛致死术（等于 euthanatize）

第 三 人 称 单 数 e u t h a n i z e s

现 在 分 词 e u t h a n i z i n g

过 去 式 e u t h a n i z e d

过 去 分 词 e u t h a n i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Learn Mandarin Chinese – How to say – She decided not to euthanize her dying cat because she thought her little daughter could not bear it.

她决定不给她生命垂危的猫安乐死，因为她想她的小女儿会承受不了。

2.That was the case with Ellis, who asked his sister to euthanize his 2-year-old Yorkshire terrier after his death because “nobody would love him like he did.”

埃利斯的情况是，他请求妹妹在他死后给自己的两岁约克郡犬实行安乐死，因为“没有人比他更爱他的狗。”

3.This heartbreaking website works with 120 shelters all over the US that put dogs to euthanize.

这个令人心碎的网站与全美国一百二十个有实行安乐死的收容所合作。

4.That was the case with Ellis, who asked his sister to euthanize his 2-year-old Yorkshire terrier after his death because “nobody would love him like he did.”

埃利斯的情况是，他请求妹妹在他死后给自己的两岁约克郡犬实行安乐死，因为“没有人比他更爱他的狗。”

5.Animal shelters euthanize surplus Numbers of pets, what will we do with excess people?

动物收容所对多余的宠物实行安乐死，那面对过剩的人口我们怎么办呢？

6.It must be of a bulldozer operator. confronted by a dilapidated building, he can say: hi buddy, I need to euthanize you.

应该是开推土机的人吧，他可以面对一座危房，然后说“哥们，我得把你人道毁灭了”。

7.An animal shelter was threatening to euthanize it if his owner did not come back.

一个动物收容所正恐吓说，如果它的主人没有回来就将它至于安乐死。

8.Currently four states—Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, and Nebraska—require special training for workers who use lethal injection to euthanize animals.

现在，美国已经有4个州——科罗拉多州、佐治亚州、印地安纳州和内布拉斯加州要求对给动物实施注射安乐死的工作人员进行特殊的技能培训。

9.The veterinarian had to euthanize the dog due to its severe illness.

由于狗的重病，兽医不得不安乐死它。

10.Many pet owners choose to euthanize their animals when they are suffering.

许多宠物主人选择在动物痛苦时安乐死它们。

11.The shelter decided to euthanize the stray cats to control the population.

收容所决定安乐死流浪猫以控制数量。

12.After consulting with the doctor, she made the difficult decision to euthanize her terminally ill cat.

在与医生咨询后，她做出了安乐死她绝症猫咪的艰难决定。

13.Some people believe that it is humane to euthanize animals in pain.

一些人认为对痛苦中的动物进行安乐死是人道的做法。

作文

Euthanasia, often referred to as ‘mercy killing’, is a complex and sensitive topic that evokes strong emotions and ethical debates. The term euthanize (安乐死) refers to the practice of intentionally ending a person's life to relieve them from suffering, typically in cases of terminal illness or unbearable pain. This act raises significant moral questions about the value of life, the rights of individuals, and the role of healthcare professionals. In many cultures, the concept of euthanize (安乐死) is controversial. Some argue that it is a compassionate choice that allows individuals to die with dignity rather than endure prolonged suffering. For instance, patients diagnosed with terminal cancer may experience excruciating pain, and the idea of euthanize (安乐死) can be seen as a way to alleviate their suffering. Proponents of this practice believe that individuals should have the right to make decisions about their own lives, including the right to choose when and how to end their suffering. On the other hand, opponents of euthanize (安乐死) argue that it undermines the sanctity of life. They contend that every life has inherent value, and allowing someone to euthanize (安乐死) themselves could lead to a slippery slope where vulnerable individuals might feel pressured to choose death over life due to societal or familial expectations. Furthermore, there are concerns about the potential for abuse in the healthcare system, where patients may be coerced into making such a decision against their will. Legal frameworks surrounding euthanize (安乐死) vary widely across different countries. In some places, like the Netherlands and Canada, it is legally permitted under strict regulations. These laws typically require that the patient is experiencing unbearable suffering and has made a voluntary, informed decision to end their life. In contrast, many countries still prohibit euthanize (安乐死), viewing it as akin to murder regardless of the circumstances. The discussion surrounding euthanize (安乐死) also extends to the ethical responsibilities of healthcare providers. Physicians who assist in euthanize (安乐死) must navigate their own moral beliefs while adhering to legal standards and the wishes of their patients. This delicate balance can create significant psychological stress for medical professionals, as they grapple with the implications of their involvement in such profound decisions. In conclusion, the topic of euthanize (安乐死) is one that touches on fundamental questions about human existence, suffering, and autonomy. As societies continue to evolve, so too will the discussions surrounding the right to die with dignity. Whether one supports or opposes the practice, it is essential to approach the subject with empathy and understanding, recognizing the deeply personal nature of the choices involved. Ultimately, the conversation about euthanize (安乐死) reflects broader values about life, compassion, and the rights of individuals to make choices about their own bodies and fates.

安乐死，通常被称为“仁慈的杀戮”，是一个复杂而敏感的话题，引发了强烈的情感和伦理辩论。这个术语euthanize（安乐死）指的是故意结束一个人的生命，以解除他们的痛苦，通常是在绝症或无法忍受的疼痛情况下。这一行为引发了关于生命价值、个人权利和医疗专业人员角色的重要道德问题。 在许多文化中，euthanize（安乐死）的概念是有争议的。一些人认为这是一个富有同情心的选择，可以让个人以尊严的方式去世，而不是忍受长期的痛苦。例如，被诊断为晚期癌症的患者可能会经历剧烈的疼痛，而选择euthanize（安乐死）的想法可以被视为减轻他们痛苦的一种方式。支持这一做法的人相信，个人应该有权决定自己的生活，包括选择何时以及如何结束自己的痛苦。 另一方面，反对euthanize（安乐死）的人则认为，这削弱了生命的神圣性。他们主张每个生命都有固有的价值，允许某人选择euthanize（安乐死）可能导致一种滑坡效应，使脆弱的个体可能感受到社会或家庭期望的压力，从而选择死亡而不是生活。此外，还有人担心医疗系统可能会滥用这一权力，患者可能会受到胁迫，做出与其意愿相悖的决定。 关于euthanize（安乐死）的法律框架在不同国家之间差异很大。在一些地方，如荷兰和加拿大，在严格的法规下是合法的。这些法律通常要求患者正在经历无法忍受的痛苦，并自愿、知情地决定结束自己的生命。相比之下，许多国家仍然禁止euthanize（安乐死），无论情况如何，都将其视为谋杀。 围绕euthanize（安乐死）的讨论也扩展到医疗提供者的伦理责任。协助进行euthanize（安乐死）的医生必须在遵守法律标准和患者意愿的同时，平衡自己的道德信仰。这种微妙的平衡可能给医疗专业人员带来显著的心理压力，因为他们必须处理自己参与如此深刻决策的影响。 总之，euthanize（安乐死）的话题涉及关于人类存在、痛苦和自主权的基本问题。随着社会的不断发展，关于有尊严地死去的权利的讨论也将继续进行。无论支持还是反对这一做法，重要的是以同理心和理解的态度对待这一主题，认识到所涉及选择的深刻个人性质。最终，关于euthanize（安乐死）的对话反映了关于生命、同情和个体选择自己身体和命运权利的更广泛价值观。