evaluate

简明释义

英[ɪˈvæljueɪt]美[ɪˈvæljueɪt]

v. 评价，评估，估值；求（方程式，公式，函数）的数值

第 三 人 称 单 数 e v a l u a t e s

现 在 分 词 e v a l u a t i n g

过 去 式 e v a l u a t e d

过 去 分 词 e v a l u a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.For each side of the subject, think carefully and evaluate it.

对于主题的每一方面，都要仔细思考和评估。

2.The market situation is difficult to evaluate.

市场形势难以评估。

3.Opponents object that, in general, laypersons lack the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications.

反对者反对说，一般来说，外行缺乏评估此类广告的专业知识，可能会要求他们的医生提供不合适的药物。

4.The aim is to evaluate mice as experimental animals for Chlamydia pneumoniae infection.

目的是评价小鼠肺炎衣原体感染的实验效果。

5.It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child's physical condition or his intellectual level.

评估一个孩子的身体状况或智力水平是没有区别的。

6.A key process in interpersonal interaction is that of social comparison, in that we evaluate ourselves in terms of how we compare to others.

人际交往的一个关键过程是社会比较，在这个过程中，我们通过与他人的比较来评价自己。

7.On February 19, a committee of teachers will evaluate materials and give opinions.

2月19日，教师委员会将对教材进行评估并提出意见。

8.He encouraged delegates to evaluate treatment efforts not only based on the number of patients, but on the quality of treatment outcomes as well.

他敦促代表们在评估治疗效果时不仅要依据患者数量，而且要以治疗结果的质量为基础。

9.Teachers often evaluate students' performance through exams and projects.

老师们通常通过考试和项目来评估学生的表现。

10.Before making a decision, it's important to evaluate all possible options.

在做决定之前，重要的是要评估所有可能的选项。

11.The team will evaluate the effectiveness of the new marketing strategy next quarter.

团队将在下个季度评估新营销策略的有效性。

12.During the meeting, we need to evaluate the risks involved in the project.

在会议期间，我们需要评估项目中涉及的风险。

13.Doctors evaluate patients' symptoms to provide accurate diagnoses.

医生评估患者的症状以提供准确的诊断。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the ability to critically evaluate information is more important than ever. With the rise of social media and the internet, we are constantly bombarded with news, opinions, and data from various sources. Therefore, it is essential to develop the skill to evaluate this information effectively. To evaluate means to assess or judge the value, quality, or significance of something. It involves analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of an argument, the credibility of a source, and the relevance of the information presented. First and foremost, when we evaluate information, we must consider the source. Is the information coming from a reputable organization, a well-known expert, or an anonymous blogger? Understanding the background of the source helps us determine how much trust we should place in the information provided. For example, scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals are generally more reliable than personal opinions shared on social media. Thus, learning to evaluate the credibility of sources is a crucial step in the process. Next, we need to analyze the content itself. This includes looking for biases, logical fallacies, and unsupported claims. When we evaluate an argument, it is important to identify whether the author presents evidence to support their claims or if they rely solely on emotional appeals. A well-structured argument will typically include facts, statistics, and examples that substantiate its points. By honing our ability to evaluate the strength of arguments, we can better discern valid conclusions from misleading rhetoric. Moreover, context plays a significant role in the evaluation process. Information can change its meaning depending on the circumstances in which it is presented. When we evaluate a piece of information, we should consider the historical, cultural, and social contexts that may influence its interpretation. For instance, a statement made during a political debate may carry different implications than the same statement made in a casual conversation. Being aware of these nuances allows us to make more informed judgments about the information we encounter. Additionally, it is essential to recognize our own biases when we evaluate information. Everyone has preconceived notions and beliefs that can cloud their judgment. To overcome this, we should strive to approach information with an open mind and a willingness to challenge our own views. This self-awareness enhances our critical thinking skills and enables us to evaluate information more objectively. Finally, the ability to evaluate information is not only valuable in academic settings but also in everyday life. Whether we are deciding which product to purchase, which news to believe, or which political candidate to support, our capacity to critically assess information shapes our decisions and, ultimately, our lives. In conclusion, learning to evaluate information effectively is an essential skill that empowers us to navigate the complexities of the modern world. By considering the source, analyzing content, understanding context, recognizing biases, and approaching information critically, we can make informed choices that reflect our values and beliefs. Therefore, developing our ability to evaluate information should be a priority for everyone in this information age.

在当今快节奏的世界中，批判性地评估信息的能力比以往任何时候都重要。随着社交媒体和互联网的兴起，我们不断受到来自各种来源的新闻、观点和数据的轰炸。因此，培养有效评估这些信息的技能至关重要。评估意味着评估或判断某事的价值、质量或重要性。这涉及分析论点的优缺点、来源的可信度以及所呈现信息的相关性。 首先，当我们评估信息时，必须考虑来源。信息是来自信誉良好的组织、知名专家还是匿名博主？了解来源的背景有助于我们确定应该对所提供的信息给予多少信任。例如，发表在同行评审期刊上的科学研究通常比社交媒体上分享的个人意见更可靠。因此，学习如何评估来源的可信度是这一过程中的关键步骤。 接下来，我们需要分析内容本身。这包括寻找偏见、逻辑谬误和无支持的主张。当我们评估一个论点时，重要的是要识别作者是否提供证据来支持他们的主张，或者他们是否仅依靠情感诉求。一个结构良好的论点通常会包括事实、统计数据和支持其观点的例子。通过磨练我们评估论点强度的能力，我们可以更好地区分有效的结论和误导性的修辞。 此外，上下文在评估过程中也发挥着重要作用。信息的意义可能会因其呈现的环境而改变。当我们评估一条信息时，我们应考虑可能影响其解释的历史、文化和社会背景。例如，在政治辩论中发表的陈述，可能与在非正式谈话中发表的相同陈述具有不同的含义。意识到这些细微差别使我们能够对遇到的信息做出更明智的判断。 此外，在评估信息时，认识到我们自己的偏见也是至关重要的。每个人都有先入为主的观念和信念，这些观念和信念可能会模糊我们的判断。为了克服这一点，我们应该努力以开放的心态和挑战自己观点的意愿来接近信息。这种自我意识增强了我们的批判性思维能力，使我们能够更客观地评估信息。 最后，评估信息的能力不仅在学术环境中有价值，而且在日常生活中也同样重要。无论我们是在决定购买哪种产品、相信哪条新闻，还是支持哪位政治候选人，我们批判性地评估信息的能力都塑造了我们的决策，最终影响了我们的生活。总之，学习有效评估信息是一项重要技能，它使我们能够在现代世界的复杂性中导航。通过考虑来源、分析内容、理解上下文、识别偏见和批判性地接近信息，我们可以做出反映我们价值观和信念的明智选择。因此，发展我们评估信息的能力应该成为每个人在这个信息时代的优先事项。