evasion

简明释义

英[ɪˈveɪʒ(ə)n]美[ɪˈveɪʒn]

n. 逃脱，躲避；逃避手段，逃避方法；遁词，借口

复 数 e v a s i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Now that these countries are trying to get their finances in order, bringing down rates of tax evasion is a high priority.

眼下，这些国家正努力恢复其财政秩序，减少税款流失是当务之急。

2.Law evasion is an illegal act.

法律规避是一种违法行为。

3.He was arrested for tax evasion.

他因逃税被捕。

4.To the purists who want a straight answer, Mr Romney's retreat behind states' rights will look like the evasion it is.

对于想要一个直接答案的纯化论者，罗姆尼先生用州权做盾牌的行为看起来就是在找借口。

5.Of an international web of dummy companies used for tax evasion, but going after it would spread his team too thin.

例如，他清楚地知道一家用于避税的国际网络皮包公司，如果他跟进这个案件将会使得他的工作队伍四处分散而力量薄弱。

6.His behaviour was an evasion of his responsibilities as a father.

他的行为是逃避为父之责。

7.His constant evasion of the topic made the discussion frustrating.

他对这个话题的不断回避让讨论变得令人沮丧。

8.The politician was criticized for his evasion of direct questions during the interview.

这位政治家因在采访中对直接问题的逃避而受到批评。

9.She used humor as a means of evasion when asked about her personal life.

当被问及个人生活时，她用幽默作为一种回避的手段。

10.The detective noticed the suspect's evasion when he was questioned about his alibi.

侦探注意到嫌疑人在被询问关于不在场证明时的回避。

11.Tax evasion is a serious crime that can lead to heavy penalties.

逃税是一种严重的犯罪行为，可能导致重罚。

作文

In the realm of communication, honesty and transparency are vital components for building trust. However, there are instances where individuals resort to tactics that involve evasion (逃避) of truth or responsibility. This phenomenon can manifest in various forms, such as lying, avoiding direct questions, or providing misleading information. Such behaviors often stem from a desire to escape uncomfortable situations or to protect oneself from potential consequences. One common scenario where evasion (逃避) occurs is during interviews or discussions about personal failures. Many people find it challenging to admit their shortcomings, fearing judgment or rejection. Instead of addressing the issue head-on, they might deflect the conversation, change the subject, or minimize the importance of their mistakes. This kind of evasion (逃避) not only hinders personal growth but also damages relationships, as it breeds mistrust and misunderstanding. Moreover, in political discourse, evasion (逃避) becomes particularly pronounced. Politicians often face tough questions regarding their policies or actions. In order to maintain their public image or avoid backlash, they may engage in evasion (逃避) tactics, such as providing vague answers, shifting blame, or using jargon that obscures the truth. This practice can lead to a disillusioned electorate, as voters become frustrated with leaders who fail to provide clear and honest responses. The impact of evasion (逃避) extends beyond individual interactions; it can shape societal norms and expectations. When evasion (逃避) is normalized in communication, it creates an environment where dishonesty thrives. People may begin to believe that it is acceptable to dodge responsibility or manipulate the truth for personal gain. This cultural shift can have far-reaching consequences, affecting everything from workplace dynamics to interpersonal relationships. On a psychological level, evasion (逃避) can be seen as a defense mechanism. Individuals may engage in this behavior to protect themselves from feelings of shame, guilt, or anxiety. While it may provide temporary relief, relying on evasion (逃避) ultimately prevents individuals from confronting their issues and finding constructive solutions. Over time, this can lead to a cycle of avoidance that exacerbates problems rather than resolving them. To combat the tendency towards evasion (逃避), it is essential to foster an environment that encourages open dialogue and accountability. This can be achieved through active listening, empathy, and understanding. By creating safe spaces for individuals to express their thoughts and feelings without fear of judgment, we can reduce the impulse to evade difficult conversations. In conclusion, while evasion (逃避) may offer a temporary escape from uncomfortable truths, it ultimately undermines trust and hinders personal and societal growth. By recognizing the harmful effects of evasion (逃避) and promoting honest communication, we can build stronger relationships and create a more transparent society. It is crucial to embrace vulnerability and accountability, as these qualities pave the way for genuine connections and meaningful progress in our lives.

在沟通的领域，诚实和透明是建立信任的重要组成部分。然而，有些情况下，个人会采取涉及evasion（逃避）真相或责任的策略。这种现象可以以多种形式表现出来，例如撒谎、避免直接问题或提供误导性的信息。这种行为往往源于逃避不舒服的情况或保护自己免受潜在后果的愿望。 evasion（逃避）发生的一个常见场景是在有关个人失败的采访或讨论中。许多人发现承认自己的缺点是具有挑战性的，害怕被评判或拒绝。与其直面问题，他们可能会转移话题、改变主题或淡化错误的重要性。这种类型的evasion（逃避）不仅阻碍个人成长，还会破坏关系，因为它滋生不信任和误解。 此外，在政治话语中，evasion（逃避）尤其明显。政治家们常常面临关于他们政策或行动的棘手问题。为了维护他们的公众形象或避免反弹，他们可能会采取evasion（逃避）策略，例如提供模糊的答案、转移责任或使用模糊的术语来掩盖真相。这种做法可能导致选民失望，因为选民对未能提供清晰和诚实回应的领导者感到沮丧。 evasion（逃避）的影响超越了个人互动；它可以塑造社会规范和期望。当evasion（逃避）在沟通中被正常化时，它创造了一个允许不诚实滋生的环境。人们可能开始相信，回避责任或操纵真相以获得个人利益是可以接受的。这种文化转变可能产生深远的后果，影响从工作场所动态到人际关系的方方面面。 在心理层面上，evasion（逃避）可以被视为一种防御机制。个体可能会参与这种行为，以保护自己免受羞愧、内疚或焦虑的感觉。尽管这可能提供暂时的缓解，但依赖于evasion（逃避）最终会阻止个人面对问题并找到建设性的解决方案。随着时间的推移，这可能导致一种回避的循环，进一步加剧问题而不是解决它们。 为了抵制evasion（逃避）的倾向，培养鼓励开放对话和问责的环境至关重要。这可以通过积极倾听、同理心和理解来实现。通过创造安全的空间，让个人能够表达他们的想法和感受，而不必担心被评判，我们可以减少逃避困难对话的冲动。 总之，虽然evasion（逃避）可能提供暂时逃避不舒服真相的机会，但它最终会破坏信任，并阻碍个人和社会的成长。通过认识到evasion（逃避）的有害影响并促进诚实沟通，我们可以建立更强的关系，创造一个更加透明的社会。拥抱脆弱和问责是至关重要的，因为这些品质为我们生活中的真正联系和有意义的进步铺平了道路。