exclusionary

简明释义

英[ɪkˈskluːʒənri]美[ɪkˈskluːʒəneri]

adj. 排他的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The research of other countries' exclusionary rule in comparing law.

世界各国非法证据排除规则的比较法研究。

2.The research of other countries' exclusionary rule in comparing law.

世界各国非法证据排除规则的比较法研究。

3.Play not finish, uncle fidgeting, cut exclusionary.

戏未演完，叔父坐立不安，仓皇退席。

4.The club's membership policy was criticized for being exclusionary.

这个俱乐部的会员政策因过于排外而受到批评。

5.Many schools are working to eliminate exclusionary practices that disadvantage certain students.

许多学校正在努力消除那些对某些学生不利的排外做法。

6.The exclusionary nature of the event left many people feeling unwelcome.

这个活动的排外性质让许多人感到不受欢迎。

7.The policy was deemed exclusionary because it favored a specific group over others.

该政策被认为是排外的，因为它偏向某一特定群体。

8.Activists are fighting against exclusionary laws that prevent marginalized communities from voting.

活动家们正在反对那些阻止边缘化社区投票的排外法律。

作文

In recent years, the concept of inclusivity has gained significant attention in various sectors, including education, workplaces, and social communities. However, there still exist numerous practices and policies that are exclusionary, which means they deliberately or inadvertently prevent certain groups from participating or benefiting. This essay aims to explore the implications of exclusionary practices and their effects on society as a whole. To begin with, exclusionary practices can often be seen in educational institutions. For instance, some schools may have admission criteria that favor students from affluent backgrounds, effectively creating a barrier for those from lower socioeconomic statuses. This not only limits access to quality education but also perpetuates social inequality. When a school implements exclusionary policies, it sends a message that only a specific group of students is worthy of educational opportunities, thereby undermining the values of diversity and equality. Moreover, workplaces are not immune to exclusionary practices either. Many companies may adopt hiring processes that unintentionally favor certain demographics over others, such as age, gender, or ethnicity. This can lead to a homogenous work environment where diverse perspectives are not represented. For example, if a company predominantly hires young professionals, it may overlook the wealth of experience and knowledge that older employees can bring to the table. Such exclusionary practices not only hinder innovation but also create a culture of exclusion that can demoralize employees from underrepresented groups. The impact of exclusionary practices extends beyond individual institutions and workplaces; it affects society at large. When certain groups are systematically excluded from opportunities, it fosters resentment and division within communities. This division can manifest in various forms, including social unrest and a lack of trust in institutions. In contrast, when organizations actively work to dismantle exclusionary barriers, they promote a sense of belonging and community engagement. This not only benefits the individuals involved but also strengthens the fabric of society. In response to these challenges, many organizations and institutions are beginning to recognize the importance of inclusivity. They are implementing policies aimed at reducing exclusionary practices, such as affirmative action programs, diversity training, and inclusive hiring practices. These initiatives are designed to create environments where everyone feels valued and has equal access to opportunities. For instance, companies that embrace diversity often report higher levels of employee satisfaction and productivity, demonstrating that inclusivity is not just a moral imperative but also a business advantage. In conclusion, exclusionary practices pose significant challenges to achieving social equity and cohesion. Whether in education, the workplace, or broader society, these practices can have far-reaching consequences that affect not just individuals but entire communities. By recognizing and addressing exclusionary barriers, we can foster more inclusive environments that benefit everyone. It is essential for us to continue advocating for policies and practices that promote inclusivity, ensuring that all individuals have the opportunity to thrive and contribute to society.

近年来，包容性这一概念在教育、职场和社会社区等各个领域引起了广泛关注。然而，仍然存在许多实践和政策是排斥性的，这意味着它们故意或无意中阻止某些群体参与或受益。本文旨在探讨排斥性实践的影响及其对整个社会的影响。 首先，排斥性实践在教育机构中往往可以看到。例如，一些学校可能有有利于富裕背景学生的招生标准，从而有效地为来自低收入家庭的学生设置障碍。这不仅限制了优质教育的获取，还加剧了社会不平等。当一所学校实施排斥性政策时，它传达的信息是，只有特定群体的学生才值得获得教育机会，从而削弱了多样性和平等的价值观。 此外，职场也并非免受排斥性实践的影响。许多公司可能采用无意中偏向某些人口统计特征的招聘流程，例如年龄、性别或种族。这可能导致同质化的工作环境，缺乏多样化的观点。例如，如果一家公司主要雇佣年轻专业人士，它可能会忽视年长员工可以带来的丰富经验和知识。这种排斥性实践不仅妨碍了创新，还创造了一种排斥文化，可能会打击来自代表性不足群体的员工士气。 排斥性实践的影响超越了个别机构和职场，影响着整个社会。当某些群体系统性地被排除在机会之外时，会在社区内滋生怨恨和分裂。这种分裂可能以各种形式表现出来，包括社会动荡和对机构缺乏信任。相反，当组织积极致力于拆除排斥性障碍时，他们促进了归属感和社区参与。这不仅使相关个人受益，也增强了社会的凝聚力。 针对这些挑战，许多组织和机构开始认识到包容性的重要性。他们正在实施旨在减少排斥性实践的政策，例如平权行动计划、多样性培训和包容性招聘实践。这些举措旨在创造一个每个人都感到被重视并拥有平等机会的环境。例如，拥抱多样性的公司通常报告员工满意度和生产力更高，表明包容性不仅是道德责任，也是商业优势。 总之，排斥性实践对实现社会公平和凝聚力构成了重大挑战。无论是在教育、职场还是更广泛的社会，这些实践都可能对个人和整个社区产生深远的影响。通过认识和应对排斥性障碍，我们可以促进更具包容性的环境，使每个人都受益。我们必须继续倡导促进包容性的政策和实践，确保所有个人都有机会蓬勃发展并为社会做出贡献。