expedience

简明释义

英[/ɪkˈspiːdiəns/]美[/ɪkˈspiːdiəns/]

n. 私利；权宜；方便

复 数 e x p e d i e n c e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This system has universality, expedience to use, and expansibility in practice.

该系统在使用中具有广泛性、高效性、使用方便性和可扩展性。

2.This system has universality, expedience to use, and expansibility in practice.

该系统在使用中具有广泛性、高效性、使用方便性和可扩展性。

3.Necessity has no law, and expedience is often one form of necessity.

需要所至无法律，而”为目的不择手段”经常是一种需要。

4.There is a sense in which morality and expedience need not conflict.

从一种意义上说，道义和利益不一定冲突。

5.In times of crisis, many leaders prioritize expedience （便利性） over long-term solutions.

在危机时期，许多领导者优先考虑便利性而非长期解决方案。

6.The company's decision to cut corners was driven by expedience （便利性）, leading to quality issues.

公司削减开支的决定是出于便利性，导致了质量问题。

7.She chose the path of expedience （便利性） rather than sticking to her principles.

她选择了便利性的道路，而不是坚持自己的原则。

8.The politician's move was criticized as an act of expedience （便利性） rather than genuine concern for the public.

这位政治家的举动被批评为出于便利性而非真正关心公众。

9.Using shortcuts in research can often lead to expedience （便利性） but compromises the integrity of the findings.

在研究中使用捷径往往会导致便利性，但会损害结果的完整性。

作文

In today’s fast-paced world, the concept of expedience (权宜之计) often takes precedence over long-term planning and ethical considerations. People are frequently faced with decisions that require immediate action, and in these moments, the allure of expedience can be overwhelming. Whether in business, politics, or personal relationships, the choice to act expediently can lead to short-term gains but may compromise integrity and future outcomes. For instance, consider a business scenario where a company is struggling to meet quarterly targets. The management team might decide to cut corners in production to save costs and boost profits temporarily. This decision is made out of expedience, as it provides an immediate solution to their financial woes. However, this approach can damage the company’s reputation in the long run, leading to customer dissatisfaction and loss of trust. Similarly, in politics, leaders often face pressure to deliver quick results. They may resort to policies that offer immediate benefits to gain public approval, even if those policies are not sustainable. The reliance on expedience in governance can result in a cycle of superficial solutions that fail to address the underlying issues affecting society. For example, a government might implement a temporary tax cut to stimulate the economy, but without a comprehensive strategy for economic reform, the relief is only fleeting. On a personal level, individuals may also find themselves choosing expedience over what is right or necessary. In relationships, one might avoid difficult conversations to maintain peace, opting for a quick fix rather than addressing the root cause of conflict. This avoidance may seem convenient at the moment, but it can lead to deeper issues down the line, eroding trust and communication. While there are times when acting with expedience is justified, it is crucial to strike a balance between immediate needs and long-term consequences. One way to navigate this challenge is to adopt a mindset that values both efficiency and ethical considerations. Decision-makers should ask themselves whether their choices will benefit them in the long run or if they are merely seeking a quick resolution. Moreover, organizations and individuals can benefit from establishing clear values and principles that guide their actions. By setting a framework for decision-making, they can minimize the temptation of expedience. For example, a company might prioritize quality and customer satisfaction over short-term profits, fostering a culture of integrity that ultimately leads to sustained success. In conclusion, while expedience can provide immediate solutions to pressing problems, it is essential to recognize its potential drawbacks. Relying solely on expedient choices may yield temporary benefits but can undermine long-term goals and values. Therefore, it is vital to evaluate the implications of our decisions carefully and strive for a balance that honors both immediate needs and future aspirations. By doing so, we can create a more thoughtful approach to problem-solving that prioritizes not just what is easy, but what is right.

在当今快节奏的世界中，expedience（权宜之计）这一概念往往优先于长期规划和道德考虑。人们经常面临需要立即采取行动的决策，在这些时刻，expedience 的诱惑可能是压倒性的。无论是在商业、政治还是个人关系中，选择迅速行动可能会带来短期收益，但可能会妨碍诚信和未来的结果。 例如，考虑一个商业场景，一家公司正在努力满足季度目标。管理团队可能决定在生产中偷工减料以节省成本并暂时提高利润。这一决定是出于 expedience，因为它为他们的财务困境提供了一个立即的解决方案。然而，这种做法可能会在长期内损害公司的声誉，导致客户不满和信任丧失。 同样，在政治中，领导者经常面临施压以交付快速结果。他们可能会诉诸于能够提供立即利益的政策，以获得公众支持，即使这些政策并不可持续。在治理中依赖 expedience 可能导致表面解决方案的循环，这些解决方案未能解决影响社会的根本问题。例如，政府可能会实施临时减税以刺激经济，但如果没有全面的经济改革战略，这种救济只是短暂的。 在个人层面，个人也可能发现自己选择 expedience 而非正确或必要的事情。在关系中，人们可能会避免艰难的对话以维持和平，选择一种快速修复而不是解决冲突的根本原因。这种回避在当下似乎方便，但可能会导致更深层次的问题，从而侵蚀信任和沟通。 虽然有时采取 expedience 的行动是合理的，但在立即需求和长期后果之间找到平衡至关重要。应对这一挑战的一种方法是采用一种既重视效率又重视道德考量的心态。决策者应该问自己，他们的选择是否会在长期内使他们受益，或者他们是否只是在寻求快速解决方案。 此外，组织和个人可以通过建立明确的价值观和原则来指导他们的行动，从而受益。通过设定决策框架，他们可以减少 expedience 的诱惑。例如，一家公司可能优先考虑质量和客户满意度，而不是短期利润，从而培养一种诚信文化，最终导致持续成功。 总之，尽管 expedience 可以为紧迫问题提供立即的解决方案，但认识到其潜在缺陷至关重要。仅仅依赖于权宜之计的选择可能会带来短期利益，但可能会破坏长期目标和价值。因此，仔细评估我们决策的影响，并努力寻求尊重即时需求和未来愿望之间的平衡是至关重要的。通过这样做，我们可以创造一种更深思熟虑的问题解决方法，优先考虑的不仅仅是简单的事情，而是正确的事情。