expelling

简明释义

英[ɪkˈspɛlɪŋ]美[ɪkˈspɛlɪŋ]

n. 驱逐；排出；压榨法

v. 驱逐（expel 的 ing 形式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Evona was lured into a black hole, and Ardos erupted in anger, expelling its gaseous shell, destroying all of Varl's sister-planets.

伊沃纳接受诱惑，坠入黑洞，而阿尔多斯则愤怒地爆发，迸裂气态的外壳，毁灭了瓦尔所有的姊妹行星。

2.Sometimes, like the body expelling poisons, the soul also needs to vomit emotional toxins.

有时候，就像身体会驱赶毒物一样，灵魂也需要吐出一些毒素。

3.The therapeutic method was focused on expelling pathogenic wind, and given consideration to filling into the orifice of body.

治法以祛风为主，兼填人体空窍，主要分为补虚熄风和清热除湿祛风。

4.The militant members of the group were in favour of expelling him.

小组里的好战分子赞成把他开除。

5.Objective To seek the safe and effective method of expelling coccidian of altitude pika.

目的探求一种安全高效的驱治高原鼠兔球虫的方法。

6.The mind also becomes tranquil by alternately expelling and retaining the breath.

呼气和憋气交互进行，头脑也可以变平静。

7.Feng Boyi: Let's capture, say the report on the expelling of hooligan foreigners.

冯博一：咱们就是截取。比如说驱除老外的报道。

8.The pore volumes and the amounts of pore water also may vary considerably in actively expelling source beds.

在排烃作用活跃的烃源岩中，孔隙体积和孔隙水的数量也会发生很大的变化。

9.The school is considering expelling 开除 students who repeatedly break the rules.

学校正在考虑开除那些反复违反规则的学生。

10.The company had no choice but to expel 驱逐 an employee for unethical behavior.

公司别无选择，只能因为不道德行为而驱逐一名员工。

11.The government is expelling 驱逐 foreign diplomats due to security concerns.

由于安全问题，政府正在驱逐外国外交官。

12.After a lengthy investigation, the university decided on expelling 开除 the student involved in the cheating scandal.

经过长时间的调查，大学决定开除涉及作弊丑闻的学生。

13.The team faced the possibility of expelling 驱逐 a player for violating the code of conduct.

球队面临驱逐一名违反行为规范的球员的可能性。

作文

In recent years, schools around the world have faced the challenging issue of student behavior. One of the most controversial measures taken by educational institutions is the act of expelling students. To expel means to officially remove a student from a school due to serious misconduct or violation of school policies. This practice has sparked debates regarding its effectiveness and fairness. On one hand, expelling students can be seen as a necessary step to maintain discipline and safety within the school environment. When a student engages in violent behavior, bullying, or substance abuse, it poses a threat not only to themselves but also to their peers. By expelling such individuals, schools aim to protect the majority of students who wish to learn in a safe and conducive environment. For instance, if a student brings a weapon to school, the immediate response would often be to expel them to ensure the safety of all students and staff. Moreover, expelling students can serve as a deterrent for others. Knowing that there are severe consequences for inappropriate behavior may encourage students to think twice before engaging in such actions. It sends a clear message that certain behaviors will not be tolerated, thus promoting a culture of respect and responsibility among students. However, critics argue that expelling students can lead to negative long-term consequences for both the individual and society. When a student is expelled, they are often left without educational opportunities, which can hinder their future prospects. Many expelled students struggle to reintegrate into society, leading to higher dropout rates and increased chances of engaging in criminal activities. This raises the question: is expelling students really the best solution? Furthermore, some believe that the expulsion process can be disproportionately harsh, especially for students from marginalized backgrounds. Factors such as socioeconomic status, mental health issues, and learning disabilities can contribute to a student's behavior. Instead of expelling these students, schools should focus on providing support and resources to address the root causes of their actions. Implementing restorative justice practices, for example, can help students learn from their mistakes while still remaining in school. In conclusion, the act of expelling students is a complex issue that requires careful consideration. While it may be necessary in certain situations to ensure the safety and well-being of the school community, it is essential to explore alternative approaches that promote rehabilitation rather than punishment. Schools should strive to create an inclusive environment where all students have the opportunity to learn and grow, even after making mistakes. Ultimately, the goal should be to educate and guide students towards becoming responsible and productive members of society, rather than simply expelling them from the educational system.

近年来，世界各地的学校面临着学生行为问题的挑战。教育机构采取的最具争议的措施之一就是将学生开除。开除是指因严重的不当行为或违反学校政策而正式将学生从学校中移除。这一做法引发了关于其有效性和公平性的辩论。 一方面，开除学生可以被视为维持学校环境纪律和安全的必要步骤。当学生参与暴力行为、欺凌或药物滥用时，这不仅对他们自己构成威胁，也对同龄人造成威胁。通过开除这些个体，学校旨在保护那些希望在安全和有利环境中学习的大多数学生。例如，如果有学生携带武器到学校，通常的即时反应是开除他们，以确保所有学生和教职员工的安全。 此外，开除学生可以作为对其他人的威慑。知道不当行为会有严重后果，可能会促使学生在参与此类行为之前三思而后行。这向学生传达了一个明确的信息，即某些行为是不可容忍的，从而促进了学生之间尊重和责任感的文化。 然而，批评者认为，开除学生可能导致个人和社会的长期负面后果。当学生被开除时，他们往往失去了接受教育的机会，这可能妨碍他们的未来前景。许多被开除的学生在重新融入社会时面临困难，导致辍学率上升和参与犯罪活动的可能性增加。这就提出了一个问题：开除学生真的算是最佳解决方案吗？ 此外，一些人认为，开除过程可能过于严厉，特别是对于来自边缘化背景的学生。社会经济地位、心理健康问题和学习障碍等因素都可能导致学生的行为。与其开除这些学生，学校应该专注于提供支持和资源来解决他们行为的根本原因。例如，实施恢复性司法实践可以帮助学生从错误中学习，同时仍然留在学校。 总之，开除学生这一行为是一个复杂的问题，需要仔细考虑。虽然在某些情况下，为了确保学校社区的安全和福祉，这可能是必要的，但探索促进康复而非惩罚的替代方法至关重要。学校应该努力创造一个包容的环境，让所有学生都有机会学习和成长，即使在犯错之后。最终，目标应该是教育和引导学生成为负责任和有生产力的社会成员，而不仅仅是将他们开除出教育系统。