expropriate

简明释义

英[eksˈprəʊprieɪt]美[eksˈproʊprieɪt]

vt. 没收，征用；剥夺

第 三 人 称 单 数 e x p r o p r i a t e s

现 在 分 词 e x p r o p r i a t i n g

过 去 式 e x p r o p r i a t e d

过 去 分 词 e x p r o p r i a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Now this brings us to Gates's key concept: what does it mean to expropriate other people's traditions, more particularly the white tradition, and what is the advantage of doing so?

现在讲盖茨的关键概念：，什么是利用他人的传统，尤其是白人的传统？，这样做有何优势？

2.Now this brings us to Gates's key concept: what does it mean to expropriate other people's traditions, more particularly the white tradition, and what is the advantage of doing so?

现在讲盖茨的关键概念：，什么是利用他人的传统，尤其是白人的传统？，这样做有何优势？

3."We are agents of the Committee, and we have a warrant to expropriate this house," announced one of the guards, a short and plump man with a heavy black beard.

“我们是革委会代表，我们有征用此宅的权利，”其中一个留着浓密的络腮胡的矮胖护卫叫道。

4."The State may, in the public interest, expropriate or requisition private property of citizens and pay compensation in accordance with the law".

国家为了公共利益的需要，可以依照法律规定对公民的私有财产实行征收或者征用并给予补偿。

5.The state may, for the public interest, expropriate or take over land for public use, and pay compensation in accordance with the law.

国家为了公共利益的需要，可以依照法律规定对土地实行征收或者征用并给予补偿。

6.The state may for the public interest expropriate or take over land for public use and pay compensation in accordance with the law.

国家为了公共利益的需要，可以依照法律规定对土地实行征收或者征用并给予补偿。

7.To expropriate more private benefit, they always separate control from cash flow rights by cross - ownership and stock pyramids.

而且为最大化获取的私人收益，他们往往通过金字塔结构等分离现金流所有权和控制权的形式对公司实施控制。

8.The State may, in the interest of the public, lawfully expropriate or requisition land and give compensation accordingly.

国家为了公共利益的需要，可以依法对土地实行征收或者征用并给予补偿。

9.If they try to stop production he said, I'll expropriate them and pay nothing.

他说，如果这些加工厂试图停止生产，他将无偿没收。

10.The government may decide to expropriate land for public use, such as building a highway.

政府可能决定征用土地用于公共用途，例如修建高速公路。

11.In some countries, the state has the right to expropriate private property in order to develop infrastructure.

在一些国家，国家有权征用私人财产以发展基础设施。

12.The law allows the city to expropriate properties that are deemed unsafe for habitation.

法律允许城市征用被认为不安全居住的财产。

13.Farmers were concerned that the new legislation would enable the government to expropriate their lands.

农民们担心新立法将使政府能够征用他们的土地。

14.To build the new school, the district had to expropriate several residential properties.

为了建造新学校，学区不得不征用几处住宅物业。

作文

The concept of property rights is fundamental in any society, as it dictates how resources are allocated and utilized. However, there are instances when governments or authorities may need to take control of private property for public use. This process is known as expropriation, which refers to the act of a government taking private property for public use, often with compensation to the owner. While expropriation can be essential for infrastructure projects such as building roads, schools, or hospitals, it raises significant ethical and legal questions regarding the rights of property owners. In many countries, the law stipulates that expropriation must be conducted fairly and justly, ensuring that property owners receive adequate compensation for their loss. This principle is rooted in the idea that while the government has the right to take land for the greater good, it also has an obligation to respect individual rights and provide fair compensation. However, the implementation of expropriation laws can vary widely, leading to disputes and dissatisfaction among affected property owners. One notable example of expropriation occurred during the construction of the Interstate Highway System in the United States. The government needed to acquire large tracts of land to build highways that would connect cities and facilitate commerce. In many cases, homeowners and businesses found themselves faced with the reality of losing their properties. Although they were compensated, the amounts offered were often seen as inadequate, leading to protests and legal battles. Moreover, expropriation is not limited to physical land; it can also extend to intellectual property and natural resources. For instance, in some countries, the government may expropriate oil reserves or mineral rights from private companies to ensure that these resources are utilized for the benefit of the public. This practice can lead to tension between the government and private enterprises, particularly if the companies feel that their investments are being unjustly taken away. Critics of expropriation argue that it can undermine the principles of capitalism and private ownership. They believe that when governments have the power to take property at will, it creates an environment of uncertainty that can deter investment and innovation. Conversely, proponents argue that expropriation is necessary for social justice and economic development, especially in developing countries where land reform is crucial for addressing inequalities. Ultimately, the debate surrounding expropriation centers on finding a balance between the needs of the public and the rights of individuals. Policymakers must navigate the complexities of property rights while considering the broader implications of their decisions. Transparent processes, fair compensation, and open dialogue between governments and citizens are essential to ensure that expropriation is carried out in a manner that respects individual rights while serving the public good. In conclusion, expropriation is a powerful tool that can facilitate progress and development, but it must be handled with care. By ensuring that property owners are treated fairly and justly, societies can work towards achieving a balance that benefits both the public and private sectors. Understanding the nuances of expropriation is crucial for anyone interested in law, economics, or public policy, as it plays a significant role in shaping the landscape of property rights and government authority.

财产权的概念在任何社会中都是基础，因为它决定了资源的分配和利用。然而，有时政府或当局可能需要控制私人财产以供公共使用。这个过程被称为征用，指的是政府为了公共利益而占用私人财产的行为，通常会给予所有者补偿。虽然征用对于基础设施项目（如修建道路、学校或医院）至关重要，但它引发了关于财产所有者权利的重大伦理和法律问题。 在许多国家，法律规定征用必须公平公正地进行，确保财产所有者因损失而获得足够的补偿。这一原则根植于这样一种观念：虽然政府有权为更大的利益占用土地，但它也有责任尊重个人权利并提供公平的补偿。然而，征用法律的实施差异很大，导致受影响的财产所有者之间发生争议和不满。 一个显著的征用实例发生在美国州际公路系统的建设过程中。政府需要收购大片土地来修建连接城市并促进商业的高速公路。在许多情况下，房主和企业发现自己面临失去财产的现实。尽管他们得到了补偿，但所提供的金额往往被视为不充分，导致抗议和法律斗争。 此外，征用不仅限于物理土地；它也可以扩展到知识产权和自然资源。例如，在某些国家，政府可能会征用私营公司的石油储备或矿权，以确保这些资源用于公众利益。这种做法可能导致政府与私营企业之间的紧张关系，特别是如果公司感觉到他们的投资被不公正地夺走。 征用的批评者认为，这可能会破坏资本主义和私有制的原则。他们认为，当政府有权随意占用财产时，会造成不确定的环境，可能会阻碍投资和创新。相反，支持者认为，征用对于社会公正和经济发展是必要的，特别是在发展中国家，土地改革对解决不平等问题至关重要。 最终，围绕征用的辩论集中在寻找公共需求与个人权利之间的平衡。政策制定者必须在考虑财产权的复杂性时，考虑其决策的更广泛影响。透明的流程、公平的补偿以及政府与公民之间的开放对话对于确保征用以尊重个人权利同时服务公共利益的方式进行至关重要。 总之，征用是一种强有力的工具，可以促进进步和发展，但必须谨慎处理。通过确保财产所有者得到公平和公正的对待，社会可以努力实现既惠及公众又惠及私营部门的平衡。理解征用的细微差别对于任何对法律、经济或公共政策感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它在塑造财产权和政府权威的格局中发挥着重要作用。