expropriation

简明释义

英[ˌeksˌprəʊpriˈeɪʃn]美[ˌeksˌproʊpriˈeɪʃn]

n. 征收，征用；没收

复 数 e x p r o p r i a t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But any new rules, if not carefully formulated and, above all, enforced, could provide a one-off opportunity for mass expropriation.

但是，任何新规则，若不能审慎制定和(最重要的)执行，都有可能导致一次性的大规模剥夺。

2.There do exist international law regarding expropriation and compensation.

在征收补偿方面存在着国际法规则。

3.It is urgent to promote the legislation of the levy and expropriation law.

应加紧制定系统的征收征用法。

4.Any expropriation, attachment, sequestration, distress or execution affects any asset or assets of the Borrower.

任何影响借款人任何资产的征用、查封、扣押、亏本或执行。

5.Land expropriation is the outcome of proprietorship socialization, and the limitation to land proprietorship.

土地征收是所有权社会化的产物，是对土地所有权的限制。

6.Mr Jaua has been granted the power to sign expropriation decrees, in consultation with Mr Chavez.

Jaua被授予在向查韦斯征询后签订征收法令的权力。

7.The government announced the expropriation of land for a new highway project.

政府宣布对土地进行征用以建设一条新高速公路。

8.Many farmers protested against the expropriation of their fields without fair compensation.

许多农民抗议在没有公平赔偿的情况下对他们的田地进行征用。

9.The city council's decision to proceed with the expropriation was met with public outcry.

市议会决定继续进行征用的决定引发了公众的强烈反对。

10.In cases of expropriation, the law requires that property owners be compensated.

在征用的情况下，法律要求对财产所有者进行赔偿。

11.The expropriation of private property for public use is often a contentious issue.

为了公共使用而进行的征用私人财产通常是一个有争议的问题。

作文

The concept of expropriation is often associated with government actions that involve the seizure of private property for public use. This legal process can be a contentious issue, as it raises questions about individual rights, economic development, and social justice. In many countries, expropriation is carried out under the principle of 'eminent domain,' which allows the state to take private land for purposes such as building roads, schools, or other infrastructure projects that benefit the community as a whole. While the intention behind expropriation may be to serve the public good, it can lead to significant challenges for those whose properties are taken. Property owners often feel that their rights have been violated, especially if they believe that the compensation offered by the government is inadequate. This sentiment is particularly strong in cases where the property has been in a family for generations or holds sentimental value. As a result, the process of expropriation can lead to legal battles and public protests, as individuals and communities fight to protect their homes and livelihoods. Furthermore, the economic implications of expropriation cannot be overlooked. While it may facilitate necessary development, there are instances where the process has been misused, leading to corruption and favoritism. For example, in some cases, governments may prioritize the interests of large corporations over those of local residents, resulting in the displacement of vulnerable populations. This misuse of expropriation can exacerbate social inequalities and contribute to a lack of trust between citizens and their governments. In contrast, when executed fairly, expropriation can lead to positive outcomes for communities. For instance, the construction of new public transportation systems can improve accessibility and reduce congestion, ultimately benefiting the economy. Additionally, when governments engage in transparent processes and provide fair compensation, they can foster goodwill among residents, demonstrating that their needs and concerns are being taken into account. Internationally, the topic of expropriation is also significant in discussions of foreign investment. Many countries have laws in place to protect investors from arbitrary expropriation, ensuring that their investments are safe from unjust seizure. Bilateral investment treaties often include provisions that require fair treatment and compensation in the event of expropriation. These agreements are crucial for fostering a stable investment climate, as they provide assurances to investors that their assets will not be unfairly taken. In conclusion, expropriation is a complex issue that sits at the intersection of law, ethics, and economics. While it can facilitate important public projects, it also poses risks to individual rights and social equity. A balanced approach that considers the needs of both the government and property owners is essential for ensuring that expropriation serves its intended purpose without infringing on the rights of citizens. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a framework that supports sustainable development while respecting the dignity and rights of all individuals involved.

征用的概念通常与政府采取的涉及为公共利益而征收私人财产的行为相关。这一法律过程可能是一个有争议的问题，因为它引发了关于个人权利、经济发展和社会正义的讨论。在许多国家，征用是在“优先占有”原则下进行的，这允许国家为了修建道路、学校或其他有益于整个社区的基础设施项目而征用私人土地。 尽管征用的意图可能是为了服务于公共利益，但这可能会给那些被征用财产的人带来重大挑战。财产所有者常常感到他们的权利受到侵犯，尤其是当他们认为政府提供的补偿不足时。这种情绪在那些拥有世代相传的财产或具有情感价值的情况下尤为强烈。因此，征用的过程可能导致法律诉讼和公众抗议，因为个人和社区争取保护他们的家园和生计。 此外，征用的经济影响也不容忽视。虽然它可能促进必要的发展，但也存在滥用这一过程的情况，导致腐败和偏袒。例如，在某些情况下，政府可能优先考虑大型公司的利益，而非当地居民，从而导致弱势群体的流离失所。这种对征用的滥用可能加剧社会不平等，并导致公民与政府之间缺乏信任。 相反，当公平执行时，征用可以为社区带来积极成果。例如，新公共交通系统的建设可以改善可达性并减少拥堵，最终使经济受益。此外，当政府进行透明的程序并提供公平的补偿时，他们可以在居民中培养良好意愿，表明他们的需求和关切得到了重视。 在国际上，征用的话题在外商投资的讨论中也具有重要意义。许多国家都有法律来保护投资者免受任意征用的影响，确保他们的投资不会遭到不公正的征收。双边投资条约通常包括规定，要求在发生征用时提供公平的对待和补偿。这些协议对于促进稳定的投资环境至关重要，因为它们向投资者提供了资产不会被不公正夺取的保证。 总之，征用是一个复杂的问题，位于法律、伦理和经济的交汇处。虽然它可以促进重要的公共项目，但也对个人权利和社会公平构成风险。考虑到政府和财产所有者的需求的平衡方法对于确保征用实现其预期目的而不侵犯公民权利至关重要。最终，目标应该是创建一个支持可持续发展的框架，同时尊重所有相关个体的尊严和权利。