exterritorial

简明释义

英[ˌɛksˌtɛrɪˈtɔriəl]美[ˌɛksˌtɛrɪˈtɔriəl]

adj. 治外法权的（等于 extraterritorial）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The exterritorial service is made according to the Act on service and the Hague Convention on service.

域外送达依1970年的《送达法》和《海牙送达公约》进行。

2.The exterritorial service is made according to the Act on service and the Hague Convention on service.

域外送达依1970年的《送达法》和《海牙送达公约》进行。

3.The embassy operates under an exterritorial status, meaning it is not subject to the host country's laws.

大使馆在境外领土状态下运作，这意味着它不受东道国法律的约束。

4.International law often grants exterritorial rights to diplomats to ensure their safety and freedom.

国际法通常赋予外交人员境外领土权利，以确保他们的安全和自由。

5.Certain areas in the city are designated as exterritorial zones for international organizations.

城市中的某些区域被指定为国际组织的境外领土区。

6.The concept of exterritorial jurisdiction can complicate legal matters between countries.

法律事务中的境外领土管辖权概念可能会使国家之间的法律问题变得复杂。

7.Some corporations operate under exterritorial laws to protect their interests abroad.

一些公司在海外根据境外领土法律运作，以保护其利益。

作文

In today's globalized world, the concept of sovereignty is often challenged by various factors, including international law, diplomacy, and the presence of foreign entities within a nation. One intriguing aspect of this discussion is the idea of exterritorial (域外的) jurisdiction, which refers to the ability of a country to enforce its laws beyond its own borders. This notion raises important questions about the balance between national sovereignty and international cooperation. Historically, exterritorial (域外的) rights were granted to foreign diplomats and their families, allowing them to live under their home country's laws rather than those of the host nation. This practice can be traced back to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which established the framework for diplomatic immunity. However, as globalization continues to evolve, the implications of exterritorial (域外的) jurisdiction have expanded beyond diplomatic circles. For instance, multinational corporations often operate in multiple countries, leading to complex legal scenarios where exterritorial (域外的) regulations come into play. These corporations may be subject to the laws of their home country even when conducting business abroad. This situation can create tension between the host country’s legal system and the regulations imposed by the foreign entity's home government. Furthermore, the rise of the internet and digital communication has introduced new dimensions to exterritorial (域外的) jurisdiction. Issues such as data privacy, cybersecurity, and intellectual property rights often transcend national boundaries. For example, if a company based in one country collects data from users in another country, questions arise regarding which laws apply. The exterritorial (域外的) nature of these interactions complicates the enforcement of local laws and regulations. Another significant area where exterritorial (域外的) jurisdiction is relevant is in matters of human rights. International organizations and advocacy groups often seek to hold individuals or governments accountable for violations that occur outside their borders. In these cases, the concept of exterritorial (域外的) jurisdiction allows for the prosecution of crimes such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, regardless of where they were committed. This legal principle underscores the importance of universal justice and the idea that certain rights are inherent to all individuals, regardless of their nationality or location. However, the application of exterritorial (域外的) jurisdiction is not without controversy. Critics argue that it can lead to overreach by powerful nations, imposing their laws on weaker countries and undermining local governance. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential for conflicting laws and the challenges of enforcing exterritorial (域外的) regulations across different legal systems. In conclusion, the concept of exterritorial (域外的) jurisdiction is increasingly relevant in our interconnected world. As nations navigate the complexities of international relations, the balance between respecting national sovereignty and upholding universal principles of justice will continue to be a critical issue. Understanding the implications of exterritorial (域外的) jurisdiction is essential for policymakers, businesses, and individuals alike as we strive to create a more just and equitable global society.

在当今全球化的世界中，主权的概念常常受到各种因素的挑战，包括国际法、外交以及外国实体在一个国家内的存在。这个讨论中的一个有趣方面是exterritorial（域外的）管辖权的概念，它指的是一个国家在其边界之外执行其法律的能力。这一概念引发了关于国家主权与国际合作之间平衡的重要问题。 历史上，exterritorial（域外的）权利被授予外国外交官及其家属，使他们能够在东道国的法律下生活，而不是自己国家的法律。这种做法可以追溯到《维也纳外交关系公约》，该公约为外交豁免权建立了框架。然而，随着全球化的不断发展，exterritorial（域外的）管辖权的含义已超越外交圈。 例如，跨国公司通常在多个国家运营，导致复杂的法律场景，其中涉及到exterritorial（域外的）法规。这些公司可能会受到其本国法律的约束，即使是在国外开展业务的情况下。这种情况可能会在东道国的法律体系与外国实体本国政府施加的规定之间造成紧张关系。 此外，互联网和数字通信的兴起为exterritorial（域外的）管辖权引入了新的维度。数据隐私、网络安全和知识产权等问题往往超越国界。例如，如果一家总部位于一个国家的公司收集来自另一个国家用户的数据，那么就会出现适用哪些法律的问题。这种exterritorial（域外的）互动的性质使得地方法律和法规的执行变得复杂。 另一个与exterritorial（域外的）管辖权相关的重要领域是人权事务。国际组织和倡导团体通常寻求追究在其边界之外发生的个人或政府的侵犯行为。在这些情况下，exterritorial（域外的）管辖权的概念允许对种族灭绝、战争罪和反人类罪等犯罪进行起诉，无论这些犯罪发生在哪里。这一法律原则强调了普遍正义的重要性，以及某些权利是所有个体固有的，无论其国籍或位置如何。 然而，exterritorial（域外的）管辖权的适用并非没有争议。批评者认为，这可能导致强国的过度干预，将其法律强加于弱国，从而削弱当地治理。此外，人们还担心可能出现法律冲突以及在不同法律体系中执行exterritorial（域外的）法规的挑战。 总之，exterritorial（域外的）管辖权的概念在我们相互联系的世界中越来越相关。随着各国在国际关系的复杂性中航行，尊重国家主权与维护普遍正义原则之间的平衡将继续成为一个关键问题。理解exterritorial（域外的）管辖权的影响对决策者、企业和个人来说都是至关重要的，因为我们努力创造一个更加公正和公平的全球社会。