extraditable

简明释义

英[ˈekstrəˌdaɪtəb(ə)l]美[ˈekstrəˌdaɪtəbl]

adj. 可引渡的；该引渡的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.States Parties undertake to include those crimes as extraditable offences in every future extradition treaty to be concluded between them.

缔约国承允将来彼此间所订的每一引渡条约中都将这些罪行列为应该引渡的罪。

2.States Parties undertake to include those crimes as extraditable offences in every future extradition treaty to be concluded between them.

缔约国承允将来彼此间所订的每一引渡条约中都将这些罪行列为应该引渡的罪。

3.The suspect was deemed extraditable due to the severity of the charges against him.

由于对他的指控严重，该嫌疑人被认为是可引渡的。

4.In order for a country to extradite someone, they must determine if the individual is extraditable under their laws.

为了引渡某人，一个国家必须根据其法律确定该个人是否可引渡。

5.The lawyer argued that her client was not extraditable because the crime was political in nature.

律师辩称，她的客户不是可引渡的，因为该罪行具有政治性质。

6.Many treaties outline specific criteria for determining whether an individual is extraditable.

许多条约概述了确定个人是否可引渡的具体标准。

7.After reviewing the evidence, the court concluded that the defendant was indeed extraditable.

在审查证据后，法庭得出结论，被告确实是可引渡的。

作文

In the realm of international law, the concept of extradition plays a crucial role in maintaining justice across borders. Extradition is the formal process by which one country surrenders a suspected or convicted criminal to another country. This process often hinges on whether the individual in question is considered extraditable, meaning they can be legally surrendered under the terms of an extradition treaty. The definition of extraditable (可引渡的) varies from one jurisdiction to another, influenced by the nature of the crime and the legal frameworks in place. For instance, many countries will not extradite individuals for political offenses, reflecting a commitment to human rights and the protection of political dissidents. However, serious crimes such as murder, drug trafficking, and human trafficking are generally seen as grounds for extradition, assuming that the extraditable individual is not at risk of facing inhumane treatment or unfair trials in the requesting country. The importance of determining whether a person is extraditable cannot be overstated. Consider a case where a fugitive has fled from one nation to another after committing a heinous crime. If the alleged crime falls within the parameters of the extradition treaty between the two nations, the fugitive may be deemed extraditable. This means that the authorities in the country where the fugitive has sought refuge must cooperate with the legal processes required to return them to face justice. Moreover, the process of determining extraditability involves extensive legal scrutiny. Courts may examine various factors, including the seriousness of the alleged crime, the presence of an extradition treaty, and the potential for the individual to receive a fair trial upon extradition. For example, if a country has a history of human rights abuses, this might influence the decision regarding whether a person is extraditable. Legal representatives often argue against extradition based on these humanitarian grounds, emphasizing the need for a just legal process. Additionally, the political climate can impact extradition cases. If diplomatic relations between the two countries are strained, the likelihood of an extraditable individual being returned may decrease. Political considerations often complicate what should ideally be a straightforward legal process. Countries may prioritize their diplomatic interests over the pursuit of justice, leading to situations where fugitives evade accountability due to political maneuvering. In conclusion, the term extraditable encapsulates a significant aspect of international law and cooperation. As globalization increases, so does the necessity for countries to work together in combating transnational crime. Understanding the implications of being extraditable is essential for legal professionals, policymakers, and the general public alike. It highlights the balance that must be struck between upholding justice and respecting human rights, ensuring that the process of extradition serves its intended purpose: to bring criminals to justice while safeguarding the principles of fairness and due process.

在国际法领域，引渡的概念在维护跨国正义方面发挥着至关重要的作用。引渡是一个国家将涉嫌或被定罪的罪犯正式移交给另一个国家的过程。这个过程通常取决于相关个人是否被认为是可引渡的，这意味着他们可以根据引渡条约的条款合法地被移交。可引渡的（extraditable）的定义因管辖权而异，受犯罪性质和现行法律框架的影响。 例如，许多国家不会因政治犯罪而引渡个人，这反映了对人权的承诺以及对政治异议人士的保护。然而，严重的犯罪，如谋杀、贩毒和人口贩卖，通常被视为引渡的依据，前提是该可引渡的个人在请求国不会面临不人道的待遇或不公正的审判。 确定一个人是否可引渡的的重要性不容小觑。想象一下，一个逃犯在犯下可怕罪行后从一个国家逃往另一个国家的案例。如果所涉罪行符合两国之间引渡条约的参数，则该逃犯可能被视为可引渡的。这意味着逃犯所寻求庇护的国家的当局必须配合法律程序，将其送回以面对正义。 此外，确定可引渡性过程涉及广泛的法律审查。法院可能会审查多个因素，包括所涉罪行的严重性、是否存在引渡条约，以及在引渡后个人获得公正审判的潜力。例如，如果一个国家有侵犯人权的历史，这可能会影响关于某人是否可引渡的的决定。法律代表经常基于这些人道理由反对引渡，强调需要公正的法律程序。 此外，政治气候也会影响引渡案件。如果两国之间的外交关系紧张，被可引渡的个人被送回的可能性可能会降低。政治考量往往使本应是简单的法律程序变得复杂。国家可能会优先考虑其外交利益，而不是追求正义，导致逃犯因政治操控而逃避责任。 总之，可引渡的一词概括了国际法与合作的重要方面。随着全球化的加剧，各国在打击跨国犯罪方面的合作需求也在增加。理解被可引渡的含义对法律专业人士、政策制定者和公众来说都是至关重要的。它突显了在维护正义与尊重人权之间必须取得的平衡，确保引渡程序服务于其预期目的：将罪犯绳之以法，同时维护公平和正当程序的原则。