extrajudicial

简明释义

英[ˌekstrədʒuˈdɪʃl]美[ˌekstrədʒuˈdɪʃl]

adj. 法庭职权以外的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Despite Russia's attempts to silence its critics and hide abuses, Milashina remains outspoken, publishing accounts of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial executions, and torture.

尽管俄罗斯企图压制其批评人士以及隐藏流弊，米拉新娜依然直言不讳，坚持出版强迫失踪、法外处决和酷刑的报道。

2.Despite Russia's attempts to silence its critics and hide abuses, Milashina remains outspoken, publishing accounts of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial executions, and torture.

尽管俄罗斯企图压制其批评人士以及隐藏流弊，米拉新娜依然直言不讳，坚持出版强迫失踪、法外处决和酷刑的报道。

3.But, this being Russia, the point is not changing the status quo — the cushy, legally extrajudicial privileges of the elite — but changing the way the status quo is perceived.

但是，这是在俄罗斯，关键不是要改变现状——精英所依法享有的舒适的法外特权——而是去改变人们是如何认识现状的。

4.Commenting on the story of a 14-year-old girl and a senior police officer Rooster Cogburn alcoholic track together extrajudicial slay her father of the believers.

故事讲评了一个14岁的女孩和一名年长的酒鬼警官Rooster Cogburn一块儿追踪诛戮她爸爸的法外之徒。

5.But Mr Calderon himself has suggested placing only some crimes under civilian jurisdiction, leaving others-including extrajudicial execution-to the army.

但卡尔德龙先生本人只建议将一些罪犯移交平民司法程序，而其他人——包括法外处决的案件，留给军事法庭来裁决。

6.The government was criticized for its use of extrajudicial 法外 killings to combat crime.

政府因其使用法外处决打击犯罪而受到批评。

7.Many human rights organizations condemn extrajudicial 法外 detentions as a violation of international law.

许多人权组织谴责法外拘留，认为这违反国际法。

8.The report highlighted cases of extrajudicial 法外 executions in conflict zones.

报告强调了冲突地区的法外处决案例。

9.Some countries have laws that allow for extrajudicial 法外 measures in times of emergency.

一些国家的法律允许在紧急情况下采取法外措施。

10.Activists are fighting against extrajudicial 法外 actions taken by the state.

活动人士正在与国家采取的法外行动作斗争。

作文

The concept of extrajudicial actions has been a topic of significant debate in legal and ethical circles. In essence, extrajudicial refers to actions taken outside the boundaries of the judicial system. This can include a range of activities, from unlawful detentions to executions without trial. While some may argue that such measures are necessary in times of crisis, others contend that they undermine the very principles of justice and rule of law. Historically, extrajudicial actions have often been justified by governments during periods of political unrest or war. For instance, during conflicts, authorities may resort to extrajudicial killings or detentions under the guise of national security. These actions can lead to widespread human rights violations and erode public trust in governmental institutions. The lack of accountability in extrajudicial practices creates an environment where abuses can flourish, as individuals are deprived of their legal rights and protections. One glaring example of extrajudicial actions is the use of drone strikes in counter-terrorism operations. While proponents argue that these strikes are effective in eliminating threats, critics highlight the numerous civilian casualties and the absence of due process. The targeted individuals often do not receive a fair trial, which raises serious ethical concerns about the legitimacy of such actions. This situation exemplifies the tension between security measures and the preservation of human rights. Moreover, extrajudicial actions can have long-lasting impacts on societies. When citizens witness or experience extrajudicial actions, it can foster a culture of fear and mistrust. People may become disillusioned with the justice system, believing that it does not serve their interests or protect their rights. This disillusionment can lead to social unrest and further destabilization, creating a vicious cycle that is difficult to break. In order to combat the prevalence of extrajudicial actions, it is crucial for societies to uphold the rule of law and ensure that all individuals are granted their legal rights. Governments must be held accountable for their actions, and independent oversight mechanisms should be established to monitor potential abuses. Additionally, public awareness and education about the importance of due process and human rights can empower citizens to stand against extrajudicial practices. In conclusion, while extrajudicial actions may be seen as expedient in certain contexts, they ultimately pose a threat to justice and human rights. It is imperative that societies prioritize lawful conduct and respect for individual rights, even in challenging circumstances. By doing so, we can foster a more just and equitable world where the rule of law prevails over arbitrary power. The fight against extrajudicial actions is not merely a legal battle; it is a moral imperative that defines the very fabric of our society.

‘extrajudicial’这个词的概念在法律和伦理领域引发了广泛的讨论。基本上，‘extrajudicial’指的是在司法系统之外采取的行动。这可以包括一系列活动，从非法拘留到未经审判的处决。虽然一些人可能会争辩说，在危机时期，这种措施是必要的，但其他人则认为这破坏了正义和法治的基本原则。 历史上，政府在政治动荡或战争期间常常为‘extrajudicial’行为辩护。例如，在冲突期间，当局可能会以国家安全的名义诉诸于‘extrajudicial’杀戮或拘留。这些行为可能导致广泛的人权侵犯，并削弱公众对政府机构的信任。在‘extrajudicial’做法中缺乏问责制会创造一个滥用行为可以滋生的环境，因为个人被剥夺了法律权利和保护。 ‘extrajudicial’行为的一个明显例子是反恐行动中使用无人机袭击。尽管支持者认为这些袭击在消除威胁方面是有效的，但批评人士强调了众多平民伤亡和缺乏正当程序的问题。被针对的个人往往没有接受公正审判，这引发了关于此类行为合法性的严重伦理担忧。这种情况体现了安全措施与维护人权之间的紧张关系。 此外，‘extrajudicial’行为对社会的长期影响也不容忽视。当公民目睹或经历‘extrajudicial’行为时，可能会滋生恐惧和不信任的文化。人们可能会对司法系统感到失望，认为它不符合他们的利益或保护他们的权利。这种失望可能导致社会动荡和进一步的不稳定，形成一个难以打破的恶性循环。 为了应对‘extrajudicial’行为的普遍存在，社会必须坚持法治，确保所有个人获得法律权利。政府必须对其行为负责，并应建立独立的监督机制，以监测潜在的滥用行为。此外，提高公众对正当程序和人权重要性的认识和教育，可以使公民有能力反对‘extrajudicial’做法。 总之，尽管在某些情况下，‘extrajudicial’行为可能被视为方便之举，但它们最终对正义和人权构成威胁。社会必须优先考虑合法行为和对个人权利的尊重，即使在困难情况下。通过这样做，我们可以培养一个更加公正和公平的世界，在这里法治胜过随意权力。对抗‘extrajudicial’行为的斗争不仅仅是法律斗争；它是定义我们社会结构的道德责任。