extralegal

简明释义

英[ˌekstrəˈliːɡəl]美[ˈekstrəˈliɡl]

adj. 不受法律支配的；法律管辖之外的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Whenever one sees laws written, or extralegal measures taken, to prevent an activity, he should immediately suspect that not everyone would voluntarily behave according to those legal requirements.

任何时候，人们看到制定一项法律，或者采取法外措施去阻止一种行为，他立刻就会疑虑，不是每个人都会自愿地按照这些法律的要求去行动。

2.Whenever one sees laws written, or extralegal measures taken, to prevent an activity, he should immediately suspect that not everyone would voluntarily behave according to those legal requirements.

任何时候，人们看到制定一项法律，或者采取法外措施去阻止一种行为，他立刻就会疑虑，不是每个人都会自愿地按照这些法律的要求去行动。

3.Further evidence of the free market as a friend is suggested by all the legislation and extralegal measures taken to prevent free, peaceable, voluntary exchange between blacks and whites.

所有阻止自由、和平、自愿的黑人与白人之间交易的立法和法外措施更进一步证明自由的市场是朋友。

4.There is no excuse for the extralegal methods that went under the name of Watergate.

以水门事件为名使用非法律手段是没有理由的。

5.The group operated in an extralegal manner, bypassing official regulations.

该组织以非法的方式运作，绕过了官方规定。

6.Some communities resort to extralegal solutions when the legal system fails them.

一些社区在法律系统无法保护他们时，诉诸于非法的解决方案。

7.The vigilante's actions were deemed extralegal by local authorities.

当地当局认为这个义警的行为是非法的。

8.In times of crisis, extralegal measures can become a norm.

在危机时期，非法措施可能成为常态。

9.The organization was accused of engaging in extralegal practices to achieve its goals.

该组织被指控采取非法做法来实现其目标。

作文

The concept of extralegal actions often arises in discussions about the limits of law and the role of authority in society. In many instances, individuals or groups may find themselves operating outside the boundaries set by legal frameworks, leading to a variety of consequences, both positive and negative. Understanding what extralegal means is crucial for comprehending the complexities of justice and governance. To begin with, extralegal refers to actions that are not sanctioned by law. This can include activities that are illegal or those that exist in a gray area where the law is ambiguous or silent. For example, during times of political unrest, citizens might engage in extralegal measures to protect themselves or their communities when they feel that the government has failed to provide adequate safety or justice. These actions can range from forming vigilante groups to taking direct action against perceived injustices. One significant aspect of extralegal actions is the moral and ethical considerations that accompany them. While some may argue that such actions are necessary in the face of systemic injustice, others may contend that they undermine the rule of law and can lead to chaos. For instance, in countries with oppressive regimes, people might resort to extralegal methods as a form of resistance. Here, the line between right and wrong becomes blurred, as individuals grapple with the implications of their choices. Moreover, the rise of technology has also contributed to the prevalence of extralegal practices. The internet provides a platform for individuals to organize and mobilize quickly, often outside the purview of traditional legal systems. This can lead to movements that challenge existing laws or create new forms of governance, sometimes resulting in extralegal actions being viewed as legitimate by certain segments of society. For example, the Arab Spring was largely fueled by social media, which allowed activists to coordinate protests and share information rapidly. In this context, extralegal actions were seen as necessary steps towards achieving democratic reforms. However, the consequences of extralegal actions can be dire. While they may be initiated with noble intentions, such actions can spiral out of control, leading to violence, retaliation, and further instability. For example, in the aftermath of a revolution, newly formed governments may struggle to rein in extralegal militias that were once seen as protectors but have now become threats to peace and order. This highlights the delicate balance between pursuing justice and maintaining societal order. In conclusion, the term extralegal encompasses a wide range of actions that exist outside the established legal framework. While these actions can arise from a place of necessity or desperation, they also pose significant risks to the social contract and the rule of law. As societies continue to evolve, the challenges posed by extralegal actions will remain relevant, prompting ongoing debates about justice, authority, and the limits of legality. Understanding the implications of extralegal actions is essential for anyone seeking to engage with the complexities of modern governance and civil rights.

“extralegal”这个词的概念常常出现在关于法律界限和社会权威角色的讨论中。在许多情况下，个人或团体可能发现自己在法律框架设定的边界之外行动，这会导致各种后果，包括积极和消极的。理解“extralegal”的含义对理解正义和治理的复杂性至关重要。 首先，“extralegal”指的是未被法律认可的行为。这可以包括非法活动或存在法律模糊或沉默的灰色地带的活动。例如，在政治动荡时期，当公民感到政府未能提供足够的安全或正义时，他们可能会采取“extralegal”措施来保护自己或社区。这些行动可以从组建自卫队到直接对抗感知的不公正等多种形式。 “extralegal”行动的一个重要方面是伴随而来的道德和伦理考量。虽然有人可能会争辩说，在制度性不公面前，这种行为是必要的，但其他人可能会认为这破坏了法治，并可能导致混乱。例如，在压迫政权的国家，人们可能会诉诸于“extralegal”手段作为抵抗的形式。在这里，正与错之间的界限变得模糊，因为个人在权衡选择的影响。 此外，科技的崛起也促进了“extralegal”行为的普遍存在。互联网为个人提供了快速组织和动员的平台，往往超出了传统法律系统的视野。这可能导致挑战现有法律或创造新治理形式的运动，有时使“extralegal”行为在社会的某些部分中被视为合法。例如，阿拉伯之春在很大程度上是由社交媒体推动的，这使得活动家能够迅速协调抗议和分享信息。在这种背景下，“extralegal”行为被视为实现民主改革的必要步骤。 然而，“extralegal”行为的后果可能是可怕的。虽然这些行为可能出于高尚的意图，但它们也可能失控，导致暴力、报复和进一步的不稳定。例如，在革命之后，新成立的政府可能会难以控制曾被视为保护者但现在已成为和平与秩序威胁的“extralegal”民兵。这突显了追求正义与维护社会秩序之间微妙的平衡。 总之，“extralegal”一词涵盖了广泛的超出既定法律框架的行为。虽然这些行为可能源于必要或绝望的地方，但它们也对社会契约和法治构成了重大风险。随着社会的不断发展，“extralegal”行为所带来的挑战将继续相关，引发关于正义、权威和法律界限的持续辩论。理解“extralegal”行为的影响对于任何希望参与现代治理和公民权利复杂性的人来说都是必不可少的。