eyewitness

简明释义

英[ˈaɪwɪtnəs]美[ˈaɪwɪtnəs]

n. 目击者；见证人

复 数 e y e w i t n e s s e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In fact, the authors detail several hundred incidents, nearly all with several corroborating eyewitness reports.

而事实上，作者详述了几百个事件，几乎每个都附有若干目击证人的证词。(说辞貌似有点贬义的味道)。

2.Social media has upped the ante. It is a rich source of information and eyewitness accounts.

社交网站或许增加了撒谎的成本，这是一个拥有丰富信息和目击者的地方。

3.An eyewitness identified him as the shooter.

一位目击者指证他就是那个枪手。

4.EYEWITNESS evidence may be all very well in a court of law, but it cuts no ice with scientists.

目击者的证词在法庭上倒是很好使，但是到了科学家那里却不管用了。

5.Thus began what was for many the only eyewitness account of the worst natural disaster in our nation's history.

就这样，这个博客开启了对美国有史以来最严重的自然灾害的现场报道。

6.For a good example have a look at this article I wrote about faulty eyewitness testimony.

对此，可以看一下我写的有关错误目击者证词的一篇文章。

7.The police interviewed an eyewitness to gather more information about the robbery.

警方采访了一位目击者以获取更多关于抢劫的信息。

8.An eyewitness reported seeing a red car speeding away from the scene of the accident.

一位目击者报告称看到一辆红色汽车从事故现场迅速驶离。

9.During the trial, the eyewitness provided crucial testimony that helped convict the suspect.

在审判期间，目击者提供了关键证词，帮助定罪嫌疑人。

10.The news team interviewed an eyewitness who saw the fire break out in the building.

新闻团队采访了一位目击者，他目睹了大楼起火的经过。

11.After the explosion, several eyewitnesses came forward to share what they had seen.

爆炸后，几位目击者站出来分享他们所见的情况。

作文

The role of an eyewitness in the judicial system is crucial and often decisive. An eyewitness, defined as someone who sees an event occur, can provide firsthand accounts that may significantly influence the outcome of a trial. Their testimonies can either corroborate or contradict other evidence presented in court, making their reliability paramount. In many cases, the credibility of an eyewitness can determine whether a defendant is found guilty or innocent. Take, for instance, a robbery case where the police apprehend a suspect shortly after the crime. If there are several eyewitnesses who can clearly identify the suspect as the perpetrator, their collective accounts can create a strong case against him. However, if one eyewitness claims to have seen the incident unfold differently, this could lead to reasonable doubt about the suspect's guilt. This illustrates the power of an eyewitness in shaping public perception and legal outcomes. However, the reliability of eyewitnesses is not always guaranteed. Psychological studies have shown that human memory is fallible and can be influenced by various factors, such as stress, lighting conditions, and the passage of time. For example, during a traumatic event, an eyewitness might focus on one detail while completely missing others. This phenomenon raises questions about the accuracy of their recollections. In some notorious cases, wrongful convictions have occurred due to faulty eyewitness testimony, highlighting the need for caution when relying solely on these accounts. Moreover, the legal system has recognized the limitations of eyewitness testimony. Some jurisdictions have implemented measures to ensure that eyewitnesses undergo thorough questioning and that their statements are corroborated with physical evidence whenever possible. Additionally, juries are often instructed to consider the potential for error in eyewitness accounts before making a decision. In conclusion, while eyewitnesses play a vital role in the criminal justice system, their testimonies must be approached with a critical eye. The impact of an eyewitness can be profound, but it is essential to recognize the inherent limitations of human memory. As society continues to evolve, so too must our understanding of the complexities surrounding eyewitness testimony. Ensuring justice requires a careful balance between valuing the accounts of eyewitnesses and acknowledging the potential for error in their memories. As we strive for a fair judicial process, the lessons learned from past cases will guide us in using eyewitness testimony more judiciously in the future.

在司法系统中，目击者的角色至关重要，往往具有决定性。目击者被定义为目睹事件发生的人，他们可以提供第一手的证词，这可能会显著影响审判的结果。他们的证词可以支持或反驳法庭上提出的其他证据，因此他们的可靠性至关重要。在许多情况下，目击者的可信度可以决定被告是被判有罪还是无罪。 以一起抢劫案为例，警方在犯罪后不久逮捕了一名嫌疑人。如果有几名目击者能够清楚地识别出嫌疑人就是实施犯罪的人，他们的共同证词可以为控方建立一个强有力的案例。然而，如果一名目击者声称自己看到事件的经过与其他人不同，这可能会导致对嫌疑人有罪的合理怀疑。这说明了目击者在塑造公众看法和法律结果方面的影响力。 然而，目击者的可靠性并不总是得到保证。心理学研究表明，人类记忆是易错的，可能受到各种因素的影响，例如压力、光照条件和时间的推移。例如，在创伤事件中，目击者可能会专注于某一细节，而完全忽视其他细节。这种现象引发了对他们回忆准确性的质疑。在一些臭名昭著的案件中，由于错误的目击者证词导致了冤假错案，突显了在仅依赖这些证词时需要谨慎。 此外，法律系统已经认识到目击者证词的局限性。一些地区实施了措施，以确保目击者接受全面的询问，并尽可能用物证来证实他们的陈述。此外，陪审团通常会被告知在做出决定之前要考虑目击者证词中可能存在的错误。 总之，虽然目击者在刑事司法系统中扮演着重要角色，但他们的证词必须以批判的眼光来看待。目击者的影响可能深远，但认清人类记忆固有的局限性是至关重要的。随着社会的不断发展，我们对围绕目击者证词的复杂性的理解也必须不断演变。确保公正需要在重视目击者的叙述与承认其记忆潜在错误之间取得微妙的平衡。随着我们努力实现公平的司法程序，从过去案件中汲取的教训将指引我们在未来更谨慎地使用目击者证词。