factiousness

简明释义

英[/ˈfækʃəsnəs/]美[/ˈfækʃəsnəs/]

有党派

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The author of this essay believes that these questions will never be settled, human factiousness and fractiousness being what they are, particularly in matters of intellectual dispute.

笔者认为这些问题永无定论，人类就是喜爱搞派别之分并为此固执的扯皮，在学术上尤其是也。

2.The author of this essay believes that these questions will never be settled, human factiousness and fractiousness being what they are, particularly in matters of intellectual dispute.

笔者认为这些问题永无定论，人类就是喜爱搞派别之分并为此固执的扯皮，在学术上尤其是也。

3.The author of this essay believes that human factiousness and fractiousness are what they are.

本文的作者认为，人类的真实性和脆弱性就是他们的本质。

4.The political party's internal struggles were a clear example of their growing factiousness.

这个政党的内部斗争清楚地显示了他们日益增长的派系划分。

5.Her factiousness during the meeting led to a breakdown in communication among team members.

她在会议上的派系划分导致团队成员之间的沟通中断。

6.The factiousness within the organization made it difficult to reach a consensus on important decisions.

组织内部的派系划分使得在重要决策上达成共识变得困难。

7.Many historians attribute the fall of the empire to its factiousness and inability to unite.

许多历史学家将帝国的衰落归因于其派系划分和无法团结的局面。

8.The factiousness among the leaders created a toxic environment for the employees.

领导者之间的派系划分为员工创造了一个有毒的环境。

作文

In today's world, the concept of unity is often challenged by various forms of division. One such form is the phenomenon of factiousness, which refers to the tendency to create factions or groups that are often in opposition to one another. This behavior can be observed in political parties, social movements, and even within families. Understanding factiousness is crucial for fostering a more harmonious society. The roots of factiousness can often be traced back to differing beliefs, values, or interests. For instance, in a political context, parties may split into factions based on ideological differences. These factions often prioritize their own agendas over collective goals, leading to a fragmented political landscape. This division can hinder effective governance, as seen in many democracies where partisan conflict stymies progress on critical issues such as healthcare, education, and climate change. Moreover, factiousness can also manifest in social movements. When individuals within a movement begin to disagree on strategies or objectives, it can lead to internal conflict. This fragmentation not only weakens the movement's overall impact but also alienates potential supporters who may be disillusioned by the infighting. For example, the civil rights movement in the United States faced challenges from various factions that had different approaches to achieving equality. While these factions were united in their ultimate goal, their differing methods sometimes undermined their collective strength. In addition to politics and social movements, factiousness can even occur within families and close-knit communities. Disagreements over values, traditions, or life choices can create rifts among family members. These divisions can be particularly painful, as they not only affect relationships but can also create an environment of hostility and resentment. It is essential for families to engage in open communication and active listening to mitigate the effects of factiousness and maintain healthy relationships. To combat factiousness, it is vital to promote dialogue and understanding. Encouraging individuals to engage in discussions that acknowledge diverse perspectives can help bridge the gaps created by factionalism. Educational programs that emphasize critical thinking and empathy can equip individuals with the tools necessary to navigate disagreements constructively. Furthermore, leaders in various sectors must model collaborative behavior, demonstrating that unity can be achieved even in the face of differing opinions. In conclusion, factiousness represents a significant challenge in our increasingly polarized world. Whether in politics, social movements, or personal relationships, the tendency to create divisions can hinder progress and foster animosity. By promoting understanding, dialogue, and collaboration, we can work towards overcoming factiousness and building a more united and harmonious society. The journey may be difficult, but the rewards of unity far outweigh the temporary comfort of division.

在当今世界，团结的概念常常受到各种分裂形式的挑战。其中一种形式是factiousness现象，它指的是创造派系或彼此对立的群体的倾向。这种行为可以在政党、社会运动甚至家庭中观察到。理解factiousness对于促进更和谐的社会至关重要。 Factiousness的根源往往可以追溯到不同的信仰、价值观或利益。例如，在政治背景下，各政党可能会根据意识形态差异分裂为派系。这些派系通常优先考虑自己的议程而非集体目标，导致政治格局的碎片化。这种分裂可能阻碍有效治理，正如许多民主国家所示，党派冲突阻碍了在医疗保健、教育和气候变化等关键问题上的进展。 此外，factiousness也可以在社会运动中表现出来。当运动中的个体开始在策略或目标上产生分歧时，可能会导致内部冲突。这种碎片化不仅削弱了运动的整体影响力，还使潜在支持者感到失望，因为他们可能会因内部争斗而疏远。例如，美国的民权运动面临着来自不同派系的挑战，这些派系在实现平等的方式上有不同的看法。尽管这些派系在最终目标上团结一致，但他们的方法差异有时会削弱他们的集体力量。 除了政治和社会运动，factiousness甚至可以发生在家庭和紧密的社区中。对价值观、传统或生活选择的分歧可能会在家庭成员之间造成裂痕。这些分裂可能特别痛苦，因为它们不仅影响关系，还可能营造出敌意和怨恨的环境。家庭进行开放沟通和积极倾听对于减轻factiousness的影响并保持健康关系至关重要。 为了对抗factiousness，促进对话和理解至关重要。鼓励个人参与承认不同观点的讨论可以帮助弥合派系主义造成的鸿沟。强调批判性思维和同理心的教育项目可以为个人提供必要的工具，以建设性地应对分歧。此外，各个领域的领导者必须以合作行为为榜样，表明即使在意见不同的情况下也可以实现团结。 总之，factiousness在我们日益极化的世界中代表了一个重大挑战。无论是在政治、社会运动还是个人关系中，创造分裂的倾向都可能阻碍进展并助长敌意。通过促进理解、对话和合作，我们可以努力克服factiousness，建立一个更加团结和和谐的社会。这一旅程可能会很困难，但团结的回报远远超过了分裂的短暂安慰。