fallaciously

简明释义

英[fəˈleɪʃəsli]美[fəˈleɪʃəsli]

adv. 令人失望地；谬误地；骗人地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This inequality will be especially brought out in the fact that the time they spend together - which fallaciously seems to be the same time - does not have the same value for both partners.

这种不平等尤其表现在这一事实上，即他们所共同度过的时间，尽管看上去是等量的，实际上对于双方却有着不同的价值。

2.This inequality will be especially brought out in the fact that the time they spend together - which fallaciously seems to be the same time - does not have the same value for both partners.

这种不平等尤其表现在这一事实上，即他们所共同度过的时间，尽管看上去是等量的，实际上对于双方却有着不同的价值。

3.If the concept of identification is just founded on a group of algorithms or simply form of "data in, model out", the result of identification will always be fallaciously.

如果辨识的概念只是建立在一组算法或简单的“数据进，模型出”上，那么辨识所获得的结果往往是令人失望的。

4.But, the vulgarization process of economics is economics principle not only popularize a process, also be certain economics popularizes a process fallaciously likely.

但是，经济学的世俗化过程不仅是经济学原理的普及过程，也有可能是某些经济学谬误的普及过程。

5.Some people fallaciously think that drink no water can help loose weight.

有些人有着这样的谬论，不喝水可以减肥！

6.The argument was built fallaciously, leading to a misleading conclusion.

这个论点是错误地构建的，导致了一个误导性的结论。

7.She fallaciously assumed that all politicians were corrupt based on a few bad examples.

她错误地假设所有政治家都是腐败的，仅仅基于几个坏例子。

8.His reasoning was fallaciously circular, making it impossible to trust his claims.

他的推理是循环错误的，使得无法信任他的主张。

9.The advertisement fallaciously suggested that using their product would guarantee success.

这则广告错误地暗示使用他们的产品会保证成功。

10.Many people fallaciously believe that correlation implies causation.

许多人错误地相信相关性意味着因果关系。

作文

In today's world, the spread of misinformation has become alarmingly prevalent. Many individuals fall prey to misleading arguments and deceptive information that are presented as facts. This phenomenon can be described as a fallacious way of reasoning, where conclusions are drawn based on faulty premises or illogical connections. People often accept these statements without critical analysis, leading them to make decisions that are not based on sound reasoning. For instance, during political debates, candidates may use emotional appeals or cherry-pick data to support their claims. Such tactics can persuade audiences fallaciously (谬误地) by manipulating their emotions rather than providing factual evidence. Moreover, social media platforms have exacerbated this issue, allowing false narratives to spread rapidly. Users frequently share articles or posts without verifying their authenticity, contributing to the cycle of misinformation. This behavior is often driven by cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, where individuals seek out information that aligns with their pre-existing beliefs. As a result, they may endorse arguments that are fallaciously (谬误地) constructed, reinforcing their misconceptions instead of challenging them. Education plays a crucial role in combating this trend. By teaching critical thinking skills, educators can equip students with the tools needed to analyze arguments effectively. When individuals learn to identify logical fallacies, they become more discerning consumers of information. For example, understanding the difference between correlation and causation can prevent people from jumping to conclusions based on misleading statistics. This awareness can help them recognize when arguments are being made fallaciously (谬误地), ultimately leading to better decision-making. Furthermore, it is essential for individuals to engage in open dialogues and discussions. By exchanging diverse perspectives, people can challenge their own viewpoints and consider alternative evidence. This practice not only fosters critical thinking but also encourages empathy and understanding among differing opinions. When individuals approach conversations with a willingness to listen and learn, they are less likely to fall into the trap of accepting arguments fallaciously (谬误地). In conclusion, the prevalence of fallacious reasoning in our society highlights the importance of critical thinking and education. As we navigate an increasingly complex information landscape, it is vital to develop the skills necessary to discern fact from fiction. By doing so, we can protect ourselves from being misled and contribute to a more informed and rational public discourse. Ultimately, understanding how arguments can be constructed fallaciously (谬误地) empowers us to make better choices and fosters a healthier democratic process.

在当今世界，错误信息的传播变得令人担忧。许多人容易受到误导性论点和虚假信息的影响，这些信息被呈现为事实。这种现象可以描述为一种谬误的推理方式，其中结论是基于错误的前提或不合逻辑的联系。人们常常在没有进行批判性分析的情况下接受这些陈述，从而导致他们做出并不是基于合理推理的决策。例如，在政治辩论中，候选人可能会使用情感诉求或挑选数据来支持他们的主张。这种策略可以通过操纵观众的情感，而不是提供事实证据，来fallaciously（谬误地）说服听众。 此外，社交媒体平台加剧了这一问题，使虚假叙事迅速传播。用户经常在没有验证其真实性的情况下分享文章或帖子，从而助长了错误信息的循环。这种行为通常是由认知偏见驱动的，例如确认偏见，即个人寻求与其先入之见一致的信息。因此，他们可能会支持那些fallaciously（谬误地）构建的论点，从而强化他们的误解，而不是挑战它们。 教育在应对这一趋势中发挥着至关重要的作用。通过教授批判性思维技能，教育工作者可以为学生提供有效分析论点所需的工具。当个人学会识别逻辑谬误时，他们就能成为更有鉴别力的信息消费者。例如，理解相关性和因果关系之间的区别，可以防止人们根据误导性统计数据得出结论。这种意识可以帮助他们识别何时论点被fallaciously（谬误地）提出，最终导致更好的决策。 此外，个人参与开放对话和讨论也至关重要。通过交流不同的观点，人们可以挑战自己的观点并考虑替代证据。这种做法不仅促进批判性思维，还鼓励同理心和对不同意见的理解。当个人以倾听和学习的意愿参与对话时，他们就不太可能陷入接受fallaciously（谬误地）构建的论点的陷阱。 总之，社会上谬误推理的普遍存在突显了批判性思维和教育的重要性。在我们驾驭日益复杂的信息环境时，发展分辨事实与虚构所需的技能至关重要。通过这样做，我们可以保护自己免受误导，并为更加明智和理性的公共话语作出贡献。最终，理解论点如何fallaciously（谬误地）构建使我们能够做出更好的选择，并促进更健康的民主进程。