fallaciousness

简明释义

英[fəˈleɪʃəsnəs]美[fəˈleɪʃəsnəs]

n. 谬误

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Well, a very powerful example of the failure, and the fallaciousness of information, or knowledge based on consensus is what happened a few years ago in the Intelligence Agencies of the world.

嗯，一个非常强大的例子，失败，和荒谬的信息，或知识协商一致的基础上发生的事情是几年前在情报机构的世界。

2.Well, a very powerful example of the failure, and the fallaciousness of information, or knowledge based on consensus is what happened a few years ago in the Intelligence Agencies of the world.

嗯，一个非常强大的例子，失败，和荒谬的信息，或知识协商一致的基础上发生的事情是几年前在情报机构的世界。

3.The politician's argument was filled with fallaciousness, making it difficult to trust his claims.

这位政治家的论点充满了谬误性，使人难以相信他的主张。

4.Many people fall prey to the fallaciousness of social media misinformation.

许多人容易受到社交媒体错误信息的谬误性影响。

5.In academic debates, we must be careful to avoid fallaciousness in our reasoning.

在学术辩论中，我们必须小心避免在推理中出现谬误性。

6.The fallaciousness of his logic was evident when he tried to draw conclusions without sufficient evidence.

当他试图在没有充分证据的情况下得出结论时，他的逻辑的谬误性显而易见。

7.Her presentation was criticized for its fallaciousness, as it relied on outdated statistics.

她的演讲因其谬误性而受到批评，因为它依赖于过时的统计数据。

作文

In today's world, where information is abundant and opinions are diverse, it is crucial to develop critical thinking skills. One of the most significant aspects of critical thinking is the ability to identify and understand logical fallacies. Among these fallacies, the concept of fallaciousness (谬误性) stands out as a key element that can mislead individuals in their reasoning processes. The fallaciousness (谬误性) of an argument refers to its inherent flaws in logic, which can lead to incorrect conclusions or misguided beliefs. To illustrate the importance of recognizing fallaciousness (谬误性), consider the common ad hominem fallacy. This occurs when someone attacks the character or motive of a person instead of addressing the argument itself. For instance, during a political debate, instead of discussing policies, a candidate might focus on personal attacks against their opponent. This tactic distracts from the actual issues and showcases the fallaciousness (谬误性) of the argument being presented. By understanding this type of fallacy, individuals can better navigate discussions and avoid being swayed by irrelevant points. Another example is the straw man fallacy, where one party misrepresents an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. By distorting the original stance, the arguer can claim victory without engaging with the real issues at hand. This manipulation highlights the fallaciousness (谬误性) of the argument, as it does not accurately represent the opposing viewpoint. Recognizing such tactics is essential for anyone who wishes to engage in meaningful discourse rather than mere rhetoric. Moreover, the slippery slope fallacy is another illustration of fallaciousness (谬误性) that can be encountered in various debates. This fallacy suggests that a relatively small first step will inevitably lead to a chain of related events culminating in significant and often negative consequences. For example, someone might argue that allowing students to redo tests will eventually lead to a complete breakdown of academic standards. While this may be a concern, the argument is flawed due to its reliance on unfounded assumptions about future events. Understanding the fallaciousness (谬误性) of such claims allows individuals to critically assess the validity of arguments and make informed decisions. In conclusion, the ability to recognize fallaciousness (谬误性) in arguments is a vital skill in our increasingly complex world. By honing our critical thinking abilities, we can sift through the noise of misinformation and emotional appeals that often cloud judgment. Engaging in thoughtful discussions and challenging the fallaciousness (谬误性) of various arguments empowers us to form our own beliefs based on sound reasoning rather than fallacious claims. Ultimately, cultivating this awareness not only enhances our understanding of the world but also promotes healthier dialogues within our communities, paving the way for more constructive conversations and informed decision-making.

在当今信息丰富、观点多样的世界里，培养批判性思维技能至关重要。批判性思维的一个重要方面是识别和理解逻辑谬误。其中，“fallaciousness（谬误性）”的概念作为一个关键元素，可能会在推理过程中误导个体。“fallaciousness（谬误性）”指的是论点中固有的逻辑缺陷，这些缺陷可能导致错误的结论或误导的信念。 为了说明识别“fallaciousness（谬误性）”的重要性，考虑常见的人身攻击谬误。这种谬误发生在某人攻击一个人的品格或动机，而不是直接讨论论点本身。例如，在政治辩论中，候选人可能会集中于对对手的人身攻击，而不是讨论政策。这种策略分散了对实际问题的关注，并展示了所提出论点的“fallaciousness（谬误性）”。通过理解这种类型的谬误，个人可以更好地应对讨论，避免被无关的观点所影响。 另一个例子是稻草人谬误，其中一方歪曲对手的论点，以便更容易进行攻击。通过扭曲原始立场，辩论者可以声称胜利，而不与真正的问题进行接触。这种操控突显了论点的“fallaciousness（谬误性）”，因为它并未准确代表对立观点。认识到这些策略对于希望参与有意义话语而非单纯修辞的人至关重要。 此外，滑坡谬误是另一种“fallaciousness（谬误性）”的例子，可以在各种辩论中遇到。这种谬误暗示相对小的第一步将不可避免地导致一系列相关事件，最终造成重大且通常是负面的后果。例如，有人可能会争辩说，允许学生重考最终将导致学术标准的完全崩溃。虽然这可能是一个担忧，但由于依赖于对未来事件的无根据假设，该论点是有缺陷的。理解这种“fallaciousness（谬误性）”使个人能够批判性地评估论点的有效性并做出明智的决策。 总之，识别论点中的“fallaciousness（谬误性）”的能力是在我们日益复杂的世界中一项至关重要的技能。通过磨练我们的批判性思维能力，我们可以筛选出常常模糊判断的信息噪音和情感诉求。参与深思熟虑的讨论并挑战各种论点的“fallaciousness（谬误性）”使我们能够基于合理推理而非谬误主张形成自己的信念。最终，培养这种意识不仅增强了我们对世界的理解，还促进了我们社区内更健康的对话，为更具建设性的交流和明智的决策铺平了道路。