falsification

简明释义

英[ˌfɔːlsɪfɪˈkeɪʃn]美[ˌfɔːlsɪfɪˈkeɪʃn]

n. 伪造；歪曲；[审计] 篡改；证明是假

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The falsification of the testament [will] was discovered by them.

他们发现这份遗嘱被窜改了。

2.He is to say those fingerprints is falsification of, the top have no fingerprint.

他是说那些手印是伪造的，上面没有指纹。

3.Any medical investigator would accept the pattern already uncovered as evidence of falsification.

任何医务调查员都会把已经发现的这种情形当作伪造的证据。

4.This paper introduces tools of verification and falsification and then compare and analyses their characteristic.

文章从两个角度介绍安全协议形式化验证的方法：证明与证伪。

5.Fluorescent falsification - proof fiber has the everlasting property for identification.

荧光防伪纤维是一种永久防伪纤维。

6.Verification and falsification are asymmetrical and this asymmetry does not indicate that falsification is more feasible.

证实和证伪的不对称并不表明证伪更可行。

7.The scientist was accused of falsification in his research data.

这位科学家因其研究数据的伪造而被指控。

8.The falsification of documents can lead to severe legal consequences.

文件的伪造可能会导致严重的法律后果。

9.He was fired for falsification of his resume.

他因在简历中伪造信息而被解雇。

10.The company implemented strict measures to prevent falsification of financial reports.

公司实施严格措施以防止财务报告的伪造。

11.Her falsification of grades resulted in her expulsion from the university.

她的成绩伪造导致她被大学开除。

作文

Falsification is a term that often arises in discussions related to science, ethics, and truth. It refers to the act of deliberately altering or misrepresenting information or data with the intention of deceiving others. This concept is particularly significant in the realm of scientific research, where integrity and honesty are paramount. When researchers engage in falsification (伪造), they not only undermine their own credibility but also jeopardize the entire scientific community's trust in research findings. In the scientific method, hypotheses are tested through experimentation and observation. However, if a researcher chooses to manipulate results, either by altering data or fabricating evidence, it leads to falsification (伪造) of the truth. Such actions can have far-reaching consequences, including the potential for misinformation to spread, public health risks, and a loss of funding for legitimate research projects. The repercussions extend beyond the individual; they can damage the reputation of institutions and erode public confidence in science as a whole. Moreover, falsification (伪造) is not limited to the scientific field. It can be found in various aspects of life, including politics, journalism, and even personal relationships. For instance, political figures may engage in falsification (伪造) to manipulate public opinion or to gain an advantage over opponents. In journalism, the integrity of reporting is compromised when facts are altered or presented misleadingly. Such practices not only distort the truth but also contribute to a culture of distrust and skepticism among the public. The ethical implications of falsification (伪造) are profound. In a society that values truth and transparency, engaging in falsification (伪造) is a breach of moral responsibility. It raises questions about accountability and the ethical obligations individuals and organizations have towards their stakeholders. When trust is broken, it becomes challenging to rebuild relationships and restore faith in systems that rely on honesty. To combat falsification (伪造), it is essential to promote a culture of integrity and transparency. Educational institutions play a critical role in this endeavor by instilling values of honesty and ethical behavior in students. By emphasizing the importance of accurate reporting and the consequences of falsification (伪造), future generations can be better equipped to navigate the complexities of information in an increasingly digital world. Additionally, implementing stringent regulations and oversight mechanisms can help deter falsification (伪造) in research and reporting. Peer review processes, audits, and whistleblower protections are vital tools in identifying and addressing instances of falsification (伪造). Encouraging open dialogue about ethical dilemmas and fostering environments where individuals feel safe to report misconduct can further strengthen the commitment to truthfulness. In conclusion, falsification (伪造) poses a significant threat to the integrity of various fields, particularly science and journalism. Understanding its implications and actively working against it is crucial for maintaining trust in societal institutions. By promoting ethical standards and encouraging transparency, we can create a culture that values truth and fosters accountability. Ultimately, the fight against falsification (伪造) is a collective responsibility that requires vigilance and a commitment to uphold the principles of honesty and integrity in all aspects of life.

伪造是一个常在科学、伦理和真相相关讨论中出现的术语。它指的是故意改变或误传信息或数据，以欺骗他人的行为。这个概念在科学研究领域尤为重要，因为诚信和诚实至关重要。当研究人员参与伪造时（伪造），他们不仅破坏了自己的信誉，还危及整个科学界对研究结果的信任。 在科学方法中，假设通过实验和观察进行测试。然而，如果研究者选择操纵结果，无论是通过改变数据还是伪造证据，都导致了对真相的伪造（伪造）。这样的行为可能会产生深远的后果，包括不实信息的传播、公共健康风险以及对合法研究项目资金的损失。这些影响超出个人层面；它们可能损害机构的声誉，并侵蚀公众对科学的信任。 此外，伪造（伪造）并不限于科学领域。它可以在生活的各个方面找到，包括政治、新闻和甚至个人关系。例如，政治人物可能会参与伪造（伪造），以操纵公众舆论或在对手面前获得优势。在新闻业中，当事实被篡改或误导性地呈现时，报道的完整性就会受到损害。这种做法不仅扭曲了真相，还助长了公众之间的不信任和怀疑文化。 伪造（伪造）的伦理影响深远。在一个重视真相和透明度的社会中，从事伪造（伪造）是对道德责任的违反。它引发了关于问责制以及个人和组织对其利益相关者的伦理义务的问题。当信任被打破时，重建关系和恢复对依赖诚实的系统的信心变得困难。 为了打击伪造（伪造），促进诚信和透明的文化至关重要。教育机构在这一努力中发挥着关键作用，通过在学生中灌输诚实和道德行为的价值观。通过强调准确报告的重要性以及伪造（伪造）的后果，未来几代人可以更好地应对日益数字化世界中的信息复杂性。 此外，实施严格的法规和监督机制可以帮助遏制研究和报告中的伪造（伪造）。同行评审过程、审计和举报人保护是识别和处理伪造（伪造）实例的重要工具。鼓励关于伦理困境的开放对话，并营造个人感到安全举报不当行为的环境，可以进一步加强对真诚的承诺。 总之，伪造（伪造）对各种领域的完整性构成重大威胁，尤其是科学和新闻。理解其影响并积极反对它对于维护社会机构的信任至关重要。通过促进伦理标准和鼓励透明度，我们可以创造一种重视真相并促进问责制的文化。最终，对抗伪造（伪造）的斗争是一个集体责任，需要警惕和致力于在生活的各个方面坚持诚实和完整的原则。