falsifying

简明释义

英[ˈfɔːlsɪfaɪɪŋ]美[ˈfɔlsəˌfaɪɪŋ]

篡改

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.That is, they don't have enough narrative momentum to engage as dramas, but they have too much fudging and falsifying to qualify as biographies.

也就是说，它们的叙述势头不足以像剧情片那样引人入胜，但是又包含太多的篡改和夸大，不足以作为传记。

2.For months the cashier had been falsifying the accounts, but then the company found him out.

那出纳员几个月一直篡改账目，但是后来被公司发觉了。

3.In 2007, a court found him guilty of falsifying company records, a ruling that he is appealing.

2007年，法院裁定他伪造公司账目而有罪，他对这一裁决还在上诉。

4.This research was made after dozens of posts throughout the Internet, like falsifying facts about that hotel.

这项研究以很多个互联网上的事件为研究背景，例如关于那个酒店的事实歪曲。

5.The idea of falsifying a model leads to extreme defensiveness among scientists because they think if one identifies a flaw in the model, the model will be proven false.

对伪造模型的想法导致科学家之间极端的防御，因为他们认为，如果一个人能够找出模型中的一个漏洞，就可以证明该模型是假的。

6.On January 28th Mr Kerviel was placed under formal investigation for abuse of trust, breaching computer security and falsifying documents.

1月28日Kerviel就滥用职权、违反计算机安全条例及伪造文件开始接受正式调查。

7.New penalties for falsifying statistical reports are also now in force.

针对虚假统计报告的新的处罚措施现在也在实施。

8.The accountant was accused of falsifying the financial records to hide losses.

这位会计被指控伪造财务记录以掩盖损失。

9.Falsifying data in research can lead to severe consequences for a scientist's career.

在研究中伪造数据可能会对科学家的职业生涯造成严重后果。

10.The politician was caught falsifying his campaign contributions.

这位政治家被发现伪造他的竞选捐款。

11.The company faced legal action for falsifying product safety reports.

该公司因伪造产品安全报告而面临法律诉讼。

12.She was fired for falsifying her qualifications on her resume.

她因在简历上伪造资格而被解雇。

作文

In today's world, the integrity of information is more crucial than ever. With the rise of social media and digital communication, the act of falsifying (伪造) information has become alarmingly common. This essay explores the implications of falsifying (伪造) information, particularly in the realms of journalism, academia, and personal relationships. First and foremost, falsifying (伪造) information in journalism undermines the very foundation of news reporting. Journalists are expected to adhere to ethical standards that prioritize truth and accuracy. However, instances of falsifying (伪造) facts have surfaced, leading to public distrust in the media. For example, when a news outlet publishes a story based on fabricated sources or manipulated data, it not only misleads the audience but also tarnishes the credibility of the profession as a whole. The consequences of such actions can be severe, resulting in misinformation that influences public opinion and policy decisions. In academia, the act of falsifying (伪造) research results is another pressing issue. Scholars are expected to contribute original and truthful findings to their respective fields. However, cases of falsifying (伪造) data have emerged, where researchers manipulate their results to achieve desired outcomes or to gain funding and recognition. This not only jeopardizes the integrity of scientific research but also has far-reaching effects on society. When policies are based on flawed research, the potential for harm increases significantly, impacting everything from healthcare to environmental conservation. Moreover, falsifying (伪造) information can extend into personal relationships. Trust is a fundamental component of any relationship, whether it be familial, platonic, or romantic. When individuals engage in falsifying (伪造) their past experiences or feelings, it creates a facade that ultimately leads to betrayal when the truth comes to light. For instance, if someone lies about their background or intentions, it can result in emotional distress and a breakdown of trust between parties. The repercussions of such deceit can be long-lasting, affecting future interactions and relationships. In conclusion, the act of falsifying (伪造) information poses significant threats across various domains. Whether in journalism, academia, or personal relationships, the consequences of dishonesty can lead to a loss of credibility, trust, and integrity. As individuals and as a society, it is imperative to promote transparency and honesty. We must strive to uphold the values of truthfulness in all aspects of life to foster a more informed and trustworthy environment. By doing so, we can combat the negative impacts of falsifying (伪造) information and build a stronger foundation for future generations.

在当今世界，信息的完整性比以往任何时候都更加重要。随着社交媒体和数字通信的兴起，falsifying（伪造）信息的行为变得越来越普遍。本文探讨了在新闻、学术和个人关系领域中falsifying（伪造）信息的影响。 首先，在新闻行业中falsifying（伪造）信息破坏了新闻报道的基础。记者被期望遵循优先考虑真相和准确性的道德标准。然而，出现了falsifying（伪造）事实的案例，导致公众对媒体的不信任。例如，当一家新闻机构基于虚假的来源或操纵的数据发布故事时，它不仅误导了观众，还损害了整个职业的信誉。这种行为的后果可能是严重的，导致影响公众舆论和政策决策的错误信息。 在学术界，falsifying（伪造）研究结果的行为是另一个紧迫的问题。学者们被期望为各自的领域贡献原创和真实的发现。然而，出现了falsifying（伪造）数据的案例，研究人员操纵他们的结果以达到预期的结果或获得资金和认可。这不仅危及科学研究的完整性，而且对社会产生深远的影响。当政策基于有缺陷的研究时，潜在的危害显著增加，影响从医疗保健到环境保护的方方面面。 此外，falsifying（伪造）信息还可以扩展到个人关系中。信任是任何关系的基本组成部分，无论是家庭关系、友谊还是浪漫关系。当个人参与falsifying（伪造）他们的过去经历或感受时，会造成一种假象，当真相浮出水面时最终会导致背叛。例如，如果某人对自己的背景或意图撒谎，可能会导致情感上的痛苦和双方之间信任的破裂。这种欺骗的后果可能是持久的，影响未来的互动和关系。 总之，falsifying（伪造）信息的行为在各个领域都构成了重大威胁。无论是在新闻、学术界还是个人关系中， dishonesty 的后果可能导致信誉、信任和完整性的丧失。作为个人和社会，我们必须促进透明度和诚实。我们必须努力在生活的各个方面维护真实的价值观，以培养一个更具信息性和可信赖的环境。通过这样做，我们可以抵制falsifying（伪造）信息的负面影响，为未来的世代建立一个更坚实的基础。