farcicality

简明释义

英[ˌfɑːsɪˈkælɪti]美[ˌfɑrsɪˈkæləti]

n. 滑稽；谐谑

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.His thinking and writings on humor paid attention to the aesthetic value of humor, which includes farcicality, wittiness, and laugh.

他的幽默观和幽默小品创作特别重视幽默的审美价值，创造了滑稽、机警的“笑”的美感情趣。

2.His thinking and writings on humor paid attention to the aesthetic value of humor, which includes farcicality, wittiness, and laugh.

他的幽默观和幽默小品创作特别重视幽默的审美价值，创造了滑稽、机警的“笑”的美感情趣。

3.The play was filled with such farcicality that the audience couldn't stop laughing.

这部剧充满了荒谬性，以至于观众忍不住大笑。

4.In a meeting about serious issues, the farcicality of the situation made it hard to stay focused.

在讨论严肃问题的会议上，情境的荒谬性让人难以集中注意力。

5.The politician's speech was criticized for its farcicality, as it seemed more like a comedy routine than a serious address.

这位政治家的演讲因其荒谬性而受到批评，因为听起来更像是一场喜剧表演而非严肃演讲。

6.The farcicality of the situation became evident when the fire alarm went off during the wedding ceremony.

当婚礼仪式中火警警报响起时，情境的荒谬性显而易见。

7.His attempt to fix the car without any tools was an example of sheer farcicality.

他试图在没有任何工具的情况下修理汽车，这完全是荒谬性的表现。

作文

In the world of theater and literature, there exists a genre that often leaves audiences in stitches while simultaneously provoking thought about the absurdities of life. This genre is known as farce, characterized by its exaggerated and improbable situations, physical humor, and often ridiculous characters. At the heart of this genre lies the concept of farcicality, which refers to the quality or state of being farcical—absurd, ludicrous, and often comical in nature. While some may dismiss farce as mere entertainment, its farcicality serves a deeper purpose, allowing us to explore the complexities and contradictions of human existence. One of the most celebrated examples of farcicality can be found in the works of playwrights like Molière and modern comedians such as Monty Python. Their ability to weave together outrageous scenarios with sharp social commentary demonstrates how farcicality can be both entertaining and enlightening. For instance, in Molière's "Tartuffe," the absurdity of the titular character's hypocrisy is highlighted through farcical situations that expose the folly of blind faith and deception. Here, the farcicality of the plot not only elicits laughter but also encourages the audience to reflect on the moral implications of their beliefs. Moreover, farcicality transcends the realm of theater and can be observed in various aspects of everyday life. In politics, for example, the antics of certain leaders can often resemble a farce, where the absurdity of their actions and statements leads to disbelief and ridicule. This phenomenon underscores how farcicality can serve as a mirror to society, reflecting our own follies and shortcomings. The comedic lens through which we view such situations allows for a moment of levity amidst serious discourse, reminding us not to take ourselves too seriously. The role of farcicality in literature and art extends beyond mere amusement; it invites audiences to engage with themes of identity, morality, and societal norms. In the novel "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller, the absurdity of war and bureaucracy is brought to life through a series of farcical events that highlight the irrationality of military logic. The farcicality of the narrative not only entertains but also critiques the systems that govern human behavior, prompting readers to question the rationale behind authority and conformity. In conclusion, the concept of farcicality plays a crucial role in both the arts and our understanding of the world around us. It allows for a unique exploration of the absurdities inherent in human life, providing a space for laughter and reflection. Whether through the antics of a theatrical performance or the bizarre realities of our daily lives, farcicality challenges us to confront the ridiculousness of our circumstances while finding joy in the chaos. As we continue to navigate the complexities of existence, embracing the farcicality around us may just be the key to maintaining our sanity and sense of humor.

在戏剧和文学的世界中，有一种类型常常让观众捧腹大笑，同时又引发对生活荒谬性的思考。这种类型被称为闹剧，以其夸张和不可能的情境、肢体幽默以及常常荒唐的角色而闻名。在这种类型的核心是farcicality的概念，它指的是荒诞的特质或状态——荒谬、可笑，通常具有喜剧性质。虽然有些人可能会将闹剧视为单纯的娱乐，但其farcicality却服务于更深层的目的，使我们能够探讨人类存在的复杂性和矛盾。 一个最受欢迎的farcicality例子可以在像莫里哀这样的剧作家的作品中找到，现代喜剧演员如蒙提·派森也不例外。他们将荒诞的情节与尖锐的社会评论结合在一起，展示了farcicality如何既能娱乐又能启发。例如，在莫里哀的《塔尔图夫》中，主角的虚伪通过荒谬的情境被突出，揭示了盲目信仰和欺骗的愚蠢。在这里，情节的farcicality不仅引发笑声，还促使观众反思其信仰的道德含义。 此外，farcicality超越了戏剧的领域，可以在日常生活的各个方面观察到。例如，在政治中，某些领导人的滑稽行为往往看似一场闹剧，他们的行为和言论的荒谬性导致人们的不信和嘲笑。这种现象强调了farcicality作为社会的镜子，反映出我们自身的愚蠢和缺点。通过喜剧的视角来看待这些情况，让我们在严肃的讨论中获得片刻的轻松，提醒我们不要太过认真。 farcicality在文学和艺术中的作用超越了单纯的娱乐；它邀请观众参与身份、道德和社会规范的主题。在约瑟夫·海勒的小说《第22条军规》中，战争和官僚体制的荒谬性通过一系列荒诞的事件得以展现，突显了军事逻辑的非理性。叙事的farcicality不仅娱乐了读者，还批评了支配人类行为的体系，促使读者质疑权威和从众背后的理由。 总之，farcicality的概念在艺术和我们理解周围世界中扮演着至关重要的角色。它允许我们独特地探索人类生活中固有的荒谬，为欢笑和反思提供了空间。无论是通过戏剧表演的滑稽行为，还是我们日常生活的奇异现实，farcicality挑战我们面对环境的荒谬性，同时在混乱中找到快乐。随着我们继续应对存在的复杂性，拥抱周围的farcicality或许就是保持理智和幽默感的关键。