federacy

简明释义

英[ˈfedərəsi]美[ˈfedərəsi]

n. 联盟；联邦

复 数 f e d e r a c i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The dissertation asserts that an enterprise strategic federacy is a complex system, whose questions involved in the practice challenge the traditional enterprise management theories and methods.

企业战略联盟是一个复杂系统，它在实践中面临的问题对传统的企业管理理论提出了挑战。

2.The dissertation asserts that an enterprise strategic federacy is a complex system, whose questions involved in the practice challenge the traditional enterprise management theories and methods.

企业战略联盟是一个复杂系统，它在实践中面临的问题对传统的企业管理理论提出了挑战。

3.On the basis of a fully analysis of its complexity, the author advances her view that systematic methods be applied in the study of an enterprise strategic federacy.

本文在全面分析其复杂性的基础上，提出了运用系统学方法研究战略联盟的见解。

4.The new policy aims to strengthen the cooperation between states within the federacy.

新政策旨在加强州与州之间在联邦制内的合作。

5.In a federacy, individual regions often have their own laws and regulations.

联邦制中，各个地区通常有自己的法律和法规。

6.The challenges faced by the federacy require a unified response from all member states.

联邦制面临的挑战需要所有成员州的统一响应。

7.Each state in the federacy retains certain powers independent of the central government.

联邦制中的每个州保留某些独立于中央政府的权力。

8.The federacy was formed to ensure representation for diverse groups within the nation.

联邦制的形成是为了确保国家内部不同群体的代表性。

作文

The concept of a federacy is often misunderstood in the context of political systems. A federacy refers to a union of partially self-governing regions or states under a central federal government. This system allows for a balance between the autonomy of individual regions and the authority of the central government, making it an intriguing model for governance. Countries like Canada and Australia exemplify the federacy structure, where provinces or states maintain certain powers while still being part of a larger national framework. In a federacy, the division of powers is typically outlined in a constitution, which specifies the responsibilities and rights of both the regional governments and the federal government. This arrangement can lead to a more tailored approach to governance, as local authorities can address the specific needs of their populations while still benefiting from the resources and stability provided by the central government. For instance, in Australia, each state has its own laws regarding education, health care, and transportation, allowing them to cater to the unique demands of their citizens. However, the federacy system is not without its challenges. Conflicts can arise between state and federal authorities, particularly when it comes to issues such as taxation, law enforcement, and resource allocation. These disputes can lead to legal battles that may take years to resolve. Furthermore, the effectiveness of a federacy can be hampered by disparities in wealth and resources among the regions, leading to tensions and calls for reform. Despite these challenges, the advantages of a federacy are significant. It promotes diversity and accommodates varying regional interests, which can enhance democratic participation. Citizens feel more empowered when they see their local governments actively addressing their concerns, fostering a sense of community and belonging. Moreover, a federacy can act as a safeguard against tyranny, as power is distributed across different levels of government, reducing the likelihood of authoritarian rule. In conclusion, understanding the dynamics of a federacy is crucial for anyone interested in political science and governance. This system not only provides a framework for managing complex societies but also reflects the importance of regional identities and local governance. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected yet diverse, the federacy model offers valuable insights into how we can effectively govern while respecting the unique characteristics of different communities. The success of a federacy ultimately depends on the cooperation and respect between the various levels of government, ensuring that both local and national interests are adequately represented.

“联邦制”的概念在政治体系的背景下往往被误解。“联邦制”指的是在中央联邦政府下，由部分自治的地区或州组成的联盟。这种制度允许个别地区的自主权与中央政府的权威之间取得平衡，使其成为一种引人入胜的治理模式。加拿大和澳大利亚等国就是“联邦制”结构的典范，其中省或州保持某些权力，同时仍然是更大国家框架的一部分。 在“联邦制”中，权力的划分通常在宪法中列明，宪法规定了地方政府和联邦政府的职责和权利。这种安排可以导致更具针对性的治理方式，因为地方当局可以解决其人口的特定需求，同时仍然受益于中央政府提供的资源和稳定性。例如，在澳大利亚，各州在教育、医疗保健和交通方面有自己的法律，使它们能够满足公民的独特需求。 然而，“联邦制”系统并非没有挑战。州和联邦当局之间可能会发生冲突，尤其是在税收、执法和资源分配等问题上。这些争端可能导致法律斗争，可能需要数年才能解决。此外，地区间财富和资源的不平衡可能会削弱“联邦制”的有效性，导致紧张局势和改革呼声。 尽管面临这些挑战，“联邦制”的优势是显著的。它促进多样性，适应不同地区的利益，这可以增强民主参与。当公民看到地方政府积极解决他们的关切时，他们会感到更有权力，从而培养出一种社区归属感。此外，“联邦制”可以作为对专制的保护，因为权力分散在不同层级的政府之间，降低了专制统治的可能性。 总之，理解“联邦制”的动态对于任何对政治科学和治理感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。这种制度不仅为管理复杂社会提供了框架，而且反映了地区身份和地方治理的重要性。随着世界变得日益互联但又多样化，“联邦制”模型为我们如何有效治理同时尊重不同社区的独特特征提供了宝贵的见解。“联邦制”的成功最终取决于各级政府之间的合作与尊重，确保地方和国家利益得到充分代表。