federative

简明释义

英[ˈfedərətɪv]美[ˈfedərətɪv;ˈfedəreɪtɪv]

adj. 联合的；联邦性的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But who can limit the extent to which the federative principle may operate effectively?

但是谁能限制联邦原则有效运作的范围呢？

2.But who can limit the extent to which the federative principle may operate effectively?

但是谁能限制联邦原则有效运作的范围呢？

3.The United States is a prime example of a federative 联邦制的 system, where individual states have their own governments.

美国是一个典型的联邦制的国家，各州拥有自己的政府。

4.In a federative 联邦制的 structure, power is divided between the central authority and regional entities.

在联邦制的结构中，权力在中央权威和地方实体之间分配。

5.The European Union operates as a federative 联邦制的 organization, allowing member states to retain some sovereignty.

欧盟作为一个联邦制的组织运作，允许成员国保留一定的主权。

6.A federative 联邦制的 approach can help balance local needs with national interests.

一种联邦制的方法可以帮助平衡地方需求与国家利益。

7.Brazil is structured as a federative 联邦制的 republic, with multiple states having their own laws.

巴西被构建为一个联邦制的共和国，各州有自己的法律。

作文

In the modern world, the concept of governance is continuously evolving, and one of the most intriguing models is the federative system. A federative system refers to a political structure where multiple states or regions come together to form a larger entity while retaining a degree of autonomy. This model has been adopted by various countries, including the United States, Germany, and Canada, each showcasing unique adaptations of the federative framework. The strength of a federative system lies in its ability to balance power between central and regional authorities. In a federative government, local governments can tailor policies to meet the specific needs of their populations while still adhering to national laws. This duality allows for greater representation and responsiveness to diverse communities. For example, in a country like Canada, provinces have the authority to legislate on issues such as education and healthcare, which can vary significantly from one province to another. This flexibility is crucial in accommodating the cultural and regional differences that exist within the nation. Moreover, a federative system can promote unity while respecting diversity. By allowing regions to maintain their identity and governance structures, a federative government can foster a sense of belonging among its citizens. This is particularly important in multicultural societies where different groups may have distinct languages, traditions, and values. The federative model encourages collaboration and dialogue among various regions, leading to a more cohesive society. However, the federative system is not without its challenges. One significant issue is the potential for conflict between state and federal laws. Disagreements can arise when local governments enact laws that contradict national legislation, leading to legal disputes and confusion among citizens. For instance, in the United States, the legalization of marijuana in several states has clashed with federal prohibition laws, creating a complex legal landscape that complicates enforcement and compliance. Additionally, disparities in resources and governance capabilities among regions can lead to inequalities within a federative system. Wealthier regions may have the means to provide better services and infrastructure, while poorer areas struggle to meet basic needs. This imbalance can foster resentment and division, undermining the unity that a federative system aims to achieve. In conclusion, the federative model presents both opportunities and challenges in governance. Its ability to accommodate diversity while promoting unity is commendable, yet it requires careful management to mitigate conflicts and inequalities. As nations navigate the complexities of modern governance, understanding the intricacies of a federative system will be essential for fostering cooperation and ensuring that all citizens are represented fairly. Ultimately, the success of a federative government hinges on the commitment of its leaders and citizens to work together towards common goals while respecting the unique contributions of each region.

在现代世界，治理的概念不断发展，其中一个最引人注目的模型是联邦制系统。联邦制系统指的是多个州或地区聚集在一起形成一个更大实体的政治结构，同时保留一定程度的自治权。这一模型已被多个国家采用，包括美国、德国和加拿大，每个国家都展示了独特的联邦制框架的适应。 联邦制系统的优势在于其能够在中央和地方当局之间平衡权力。在联邦制政府中，地方政府可以根据其人口的具体需求量身定制政策，同时仍然遵守国家法律。这种双重性允许更大的代表性和对多样化社区的响应。例如，在像加拿大这样的国家，各省有权立法关于教育和医疗等问题，这些问题在不同省份之间可能存在显著差异。这种灵活性对于适应国家内部存在的文化和区域差异至关重要。 此外，联邦制系统可以在尊重多样性的同时促进团结。通过允许各地区保持自己的身份和治理结构，联邦制政府可以在公民中培养归属感。这在多元文化社会中尤为重要，因为不同群体可能具有不同的语言、传统和价值观。联邦制模型鼓励各地区之间的合作与对话，从而导致一个更加凝聚的社会。 然而，联邦制系统并非没有挑战。其中一个重大问题是州和联邦法律之间潜在的冲突。当地方政府颁布与国家立法相矛盾的法律时，可能会出现分歧，导致法律纠纷和公民之间的困惑。例如，在美国，几个州的大麻合法化与联邦禁令法律发生冲突，造成复杂的法律环境，增加了执法和合规的难度。 此外，各地区之间资源和治理能力的不平等可能导致联邦制系统内的差距。富裕地区可能有能力提供更好的服务和基础设施，而贫困地区则难以满足基本需求。这种不平衡可能会滋生怨恨和分裂，从而削弱联邦制系统旨在实现的团结。 总之，联邦制模型在治理中呈现出机遇与挑战。它能够容纳多样性，同时促进团结，这是值得称赞的，但它需要精心管理，以缓解冲突和不平等。随着各国应对现代治理的复杂性，理解联邦制系统的细微差别将对促进合作和确保所有公民得到公平代表至关重要。最终，联邦制政府的成功取决于其领导者和公民共同致力于朝着共同目标努力，同时尊重每个地区的独特贡献。