firearms

简明释义

英[ˈfaɪə(r)ɑːmz]美[ˈfaɪərɑrmz]

n. 火器，枪炮；轻武器（firearm 的复数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.From planters' homes and swamp cabins, a varied array of firearms came to each muster.

从农场主家里和沼泽地的棚屋里，一队一队的年轻人携带着武器奔向每个集合点。

2.In a 2009 speech, Eduardo Medina Mora, then Mexico's attorney general, said his country had seized almost 52,000 firearms in two years.

墨西哥总检察长爱德华•麦地那•莫拉在2009年的一次讲话中指出，墨西哥两年内查获近52000枝枪。

3.The police were issued with firearms.

警察都配发了小型枪支。

4.Adolescents aged 15-17 years, newborn infants and those injured by firearms had the highest risk of severe injury.

15岁到17岁的青少年、新生儿和受到轻武器伤害的儿童受到严重伤害的风险最高。

5.On the other hand, a bank robbery may require firearms, a getaway car, and tools to crack a safe, but these may still not be enough.

另一方面，银行劫匪可能需要武器，逃跑的车辆以及打开保险柜的工具，但是这仍然是不够的。

6.The material conditions are factories, railways, firearms and the like.

工厂、铁道、枪炮等，这些是物质条件。

7.There are over 550 million firearms in worldwide circulation. That's one firearm for every 12 people on the planet.

在这世界上一共有伍亿伍千万支军火在流通，那就是说每十二个人就有一支枪，唯一的问题是：我们如何让其他十一个人也有枪？

8.Rumours have circulated that Obama was not born in America and that he plans to ban firearms.

奥巴马并非出生在美国以及他准备禁枪的谣言四起。

9.The police department conducted a training session on handling firearms.

警察局举办了一次关于处理火器的培训课程。

10.He applied for a license to carry firearms in public.

他申请了在公共场所携带火器的许可证。

11.The museum has an exhibit showcasing historical firearms.

博物馆有一个展览展示历史火器。

12.In some countries, owning firearms is heavily regulated.

在一些国家，拥有火器受到严格管制。

13.He is passionate about collecting antique firearms.

他热衷于收藏古董火器。

作文

In contemporary society, the topic of firearms (火器) has become increasingly relevant and contentious. The debate surrounding firearms (火器) encompasses various aspects, including personal safety, government regulation, and cultural significance. Understanding the implications of firearms (火器) is essential for informed discussions about their role in our lives. Firstly, one of the primary arguments for the possession of firearms (火器) is personal safety. Many individuals believe that owning a firearm (火器) provides them with a sense of security, enabling them to protect themselves and their families from potential threats. This perspective is particularly prevalent in areas where crime rates are high, leading people to feel that they need to be armed to defend themselves effectively. However, this belief raises questions about whether having access to firearms (火器) truly enhances safety or if it contributes to a culture of violence. On the other hand, opponents of firearms (火器) ownership argue that the prevalence of firearms (火器) in society leads to higher rates of gun-related violence and accidents. They assert that stricter regulations on the sale and possession of firearms (火器) could reduce these incidents and promote public safety. Countries with stringent gun control laws often report lower rates of gun violence, suggesting that there may be a correlation between firearms (火器) regulation and community safety. This raises an important question: how can societies balance individual rights with the collective need for safety? Culturally, firearms (火器) have played a significant role in shaping national identities, particularly in countries like the United States. The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right to bear arms, has become a symbol of American freedom and independence. For many, this cultural attachment to firearms (火器) complicates the conversation around regulation and safety. It becomes challenging to address the issue objectively when deeply held beliefs and values are at stake. Furthermore, the accessibility of firearms (火器) through legal channels raises concerns about their acquisition by individuals who may pose a threat to society. Background checks, waiting periods, and mandatory training are some measures proposed to ensure responsible ownership. Advocating for such regulations does not necessarily mean opposing the right to own firearms (火器); rather, it emphasizes the importance of responsible ownership and use. In conclusion, the discourse surrounding firearms (火器) is multifaceted and requires careful consideration of various perspectives. While many advocate for the right to own firearms (火器) as a means of personal protection, others emphasize the need for regulation to ensure public safety. Ultimately, finding common ground will be crucial in addressing the challenges posed by firearms (火器) in modern society. As we navigate this complex issue, it is vital to engage in respectful dialogue and seek solutions that prioritize both individual rights and community well-being.

在当代社会，火器（firearms）的话题变得越来越相关和有争议。围绕火器（firearms）的辩论涵盖了多个方面，包括个人安全、政府监管和文化意义。理解火器（firearms）的影响对于进行有关其在我们生活中角色的讨论至关重要。 首先，拥有火器（firearms）的主要论点之一是个人安全。许多人认为，拥有火器（firearms）使他们感到安全，使他们能够有效保护自己和家人免受潜在威胁。这种观点在犯罪率较高的地区尤为普遍，导致人们感到需要武装自己以有效防卫。然而，这种信念引发了一个问题：拥有火器（firearms）真的能增强安全感，还是会助长暴力文化？ 另一方面，反对火器（firearms）拥有的人则认为，社会上火器（firearms）的普遍存在导致了更高的枪支暴力和事故发生率。他们主张，对火器（firearms）的销售和拥有实施更严格的法规可以减少这些事件并促进公共安全。拥有严格枪支管制法律的国家通常报告的枪支暴力发生率较低，这表明火器（firearms）管制与社区安全之间可能存在相关性。这引发了一个重要问题：社会如何在个人权利与集体安全需求之间取得平衡？ 从文化上看，火器（firearms）在塑造国家身份方面发挥了重要作用，尤其是在美国等国。美国宪法第二修正案保护了持有武器的权利，成为美国自由和独立的象征。对许多人来说，这种对火器（firearms）的文化依附使得关于监管和安全的对话变得复杂。当深厚的信仰和价值观受到威胁时，客观地解决这一问题就变得困难。 此外，通过合法渠道获得火器（firearms）的便利性也引发了人们对可能对社会构成威胁的个体获取这些武器的担忧。背景调查、等待期和强制培训是一些提议的措施，以确保负责任的拥有权。倡导这些监管措施并不一定意味着反对拥有火器（firearms）的权利；相反，它强调了负责任的拥有和使用的重要性。 总之，围绕火器（firearms）的讨论是多方面的，需要仔细考虑各种观点。虽然许多人主张将拥有火器（firearms）作为个人保护的一种手段，但其他人则强调需要监管以确保公共安全。最终，找到共同点对于解决现代社会中火器（firearms）带来的挑战至关重要。在我们应对这一复杂问题时，进行尊重的对话并寻求优先考虑个人权利和社区福祉的解决方案至关重要。