fracas

简明释义

英[ˈfrækɑː]美[ˈfreɪkəs]

n. 吵闹；喧噪

n. （Fracas）人名；（意）弗拉卡斯

复 数 f r a c a s e s 或 f r a c a s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Ed Balls, the ambitious children's secretary, has been drawn into the fracas too.

雄心勃勃的儿童学校家庭部大臣艾德·鲍尔斯也被牵扯进了这场争吵。

2.There was a terrible fracas, and, though at her mother's bidding Amy made contrite apology, Jo refused to be pacified.

接着是一场大吵大闹，尽管在母亲的严命下，艾米作了忏悔性的道歉，乔却不肯罢休。

3.The new wages policy caused a terrible fracas at the meeting yesterday.

新的工资政策在昨天的会上引起了激烈的吵闹。

4.Performs MTBF calculations based on site data from PI to support FRACAS - Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System process.

根据PI提供的现场数据进行MT BF计算，支持FRACAS运行-失效报告，分析以及纠正措施系统。

5.The decision comes after the Football Association studied video footage of Monday night's incident where two supporters - one from each club - entered the field of play, sparking a post-match fracas.

英足总是在研究了周一晚的比赛录像后作出的决定，当时有两名各自球队的支持者闯入球场并造成了场面混乱。

6.Adebayor is seen aggressively wading into the fracas, though it is not certain, on the evidence available to the Independent, that he struck anyone.

根据独立报手上的证据，可见阿德巴约的而且确进取地介入殴斗中，虽然不能确定他有攻击任何人。

7.This paper analyzes three important problems that enterprise build up the Failure Reporting Analysis and Correction System (FRACAS), presents eight steps to a successful FRACAS implementation.

分析了企业实施FRACAS工作常遇到的三个重要问题，提出了正确实施的八个步骤。

8.The bar erupted into a fracas when two patrons started arguing over a game, leading to a chaotic scene.

当两位顾客因一场比赛争吵时，酒吧爆发了一场喧闹的争吵，导致现场一片混乱。

9.Witnesses reported a fracas outside the concert hall as fans clashed over seating arrangements.

目击者报告说在音乐会大厅外发生了一场喧闹的争吵，粉丝们因座位安排发生冲突。

10.The political debate turned into a fracas as candidates began shouting over each other.

政治辩论变成了一场喧闹的争吵，候选人们开始互相大声喊叫。

11.A minor fracas broke out in the stands during the football match, but security quickly intervened.

在足球比赛期间看台上爆发了一场小型的喧闹的争吵，但保安迅速介入。

12.The fracas at the family reunion overshadowed what was supposed to be a joyful gathering.

家庭聚会上发生的喧闹的争吵掩盖了本应是一个快乐聚会的气氛。

作文

In recent years, the rise of social media has significantly impacted how we communicate and interact with one another. While it has provided a platform for sharing ideas and connecting with people across the globe, it has also led to misunderstandings and arguments that can escalate quickly. One notable incident that exemplifies this is the infamous fracas that occurred during a live-streamed debate between two prominent political figures. The event was meant to be an opportunity for civil discourse; however, it quickly devolved into chaos. As the debate began, both participants presented their viewpoints passionately, but as tensions rose, so did the volume of their voices. Supporters of each candidate were present in the audience, and they began to shout and cheer, further fueling the heated atmosphere. What started as a constructive discussion soon turned into a chaotic fracas, with both candidates interrupting each other, and the moderator struggling to regain control. The fracas reached its peak when one candidate made a particularly provocative statement, prompting an uproar from the audience. People began to stand up, waving signs and chanting slogans, creating a scene that was more reminiscent of a sports event than a political debate. The moderator attempted to calm the situation, but the energy in the room was electric, and it seemed that no one was willing to back down. This incident serves as a cautionary tale about the current state of public discourse. The fracas highlighted how quickly discussions can turn hostile in the age of social media, where opinions are often expressed without the nuance or consideration that face-to-face conversations typically allow. It raises important questions about how we can promote civil dialogue in an increasingly polarized world. In the aftermath of the fracas, many commentators reflected on the implications of such events. Some argued that the media plays a significant role in exacerbating tensions, often focusing on sensational moments rather than the substance of the arguments being made. Others pointed to the responsibility of individuals to engage thoughtfully and respectfully, even when faced with opposing views. Ultimately, the fracas serves as a reminder that while passionate debate is essential in a democratic society, it must be approached with care and respect. We must strive to create environments where differing opinions can be shared without fear of escalation. By doing so, we can foster a culture of understanding and collaboration rather than one of conflict and division. As we navigate the complexities of modern communication, let us remember the lessons learned from this fracas and work towards a more constructive and respectful discourse in all areas of our lives.

近年来，社交媒体的兴起对我们之间的沟通和互动产生了重大影响。虽然它提供了一个分享想法和与全球各地的人们联系的平台，但它也导致了误解和争论，这些争论可以迅速升级。其中一个显著的事件就是在两位知名政治人物之间进行的直播辩论中发生的臭名昭著的争吵。这场活动原本是一个进行文明讨论的机会；然而，它很快就陷入了混乱。 当辩论开始时，两位参与者都热情洋溢地表达自己的观点，但随着紧张局势的加剧，他们的声音也变得越来越大。每位候选人的支持者都在观众席中，他们开始大声喊叫和欢呼，进一步助长了紧张的气氛。原本是一场建设性的讨论，很快变成了一场混乱的争吵，两位候选人不断打断对方，主持人努力试图重新掌控局面。 当一位候选人发表了特别挑衅的言论时，争吵达到了顶峰，观众们哗然。人们开始站起来，挥舞标语牌并高喊口号，制造出一种更像体育赛事而不是政治辩论的场面。主持人试图平息局势，但房间里的气氛电力十足，似乎没有人愿意退让。 这一事件作为关于公共话语现状的警示故事。争吵突显了在社交媒体时代，讨论如何可以迅速转向敌对的状态，在这个时代，意见往往在没有面对面交谈所允许的细微差别或考虑的情况下被表达。这引发了关于我们如何在日益极化的世界中促进文明对话的重要问题。 在争吵之后，许多评论员反思了此类事件的影响。一些人认为媒体在加剧紧张局势方面发挥了重要作用，往往关注于耸人听闻的时刻，而不是所提出论点的实质内容。另一些人则指出个人在面对对立观点时应承担的责任，以认真和尊重的态度参与讨论。 最终，争吵提醒我们，尽管在民主社会中充满激情的辩论至关重要，但必须以谨慎和尊重的方式进行。我们必须努力创造一个能够分享不同意见的环境，而不必担心升级冲突。通过这样做，我们可以培养理解与合作的文化，而不是冲突与分裂的文化。在我们应对现代沟通的复杂性时，让我们铭记从这场争吵中学到的教训，并努力在我们生活的各个领域促进更具建设性和尊重的对话。