fulminate

简明释义

英[ˈfʊlmɪneɪt]美[ˈfʊlmɪneɪtˌˈfʌlmɪneɪt]

vi. 爆炸；电闪；怒喝

vt. 使爆发；以严词谴责

n. 雷酸盐；烈性炸药

复 数 f u l m i n a t e s

第 三 人 称 单 数 f u l m i n a t e s

现 在 分 词 f u l m i n a t i n g

过 去 式 f u l m i n a t e d

过 去 分 词 f u l m i n a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Conclusion Diagnosis, prevent and treat the complication in an early period is the importance measure to heighten the salvage rate and lower down the mortality of fulminate hepatitis.

结论早期诊断，早期预防及治疗并发症，是提高重症肝炎存活率、降低死亡率的重要措施。

2.Conclusion Diagnosis, prevent and treat the complication in an early period is the importance measure to heighten the salvage rate and lower down the mortality of fulminate hepatitis.

结论早期诊断，早期预防及治疗并发症，是提高重症肝炎存活率、降低死亡率的重要措施。

3.Objective: To understand the effect of compound glycyrrhizin on hepatic function of reserve in patients with chronic fulminate hepatitis.

目的：了解复方甘草酸苷对慢性重症肝炎患者肝脏储备功能的影响。

4.The professor began to fulminate against the lack of funding for scientific research.

教授开始猛烈抨击对科学研究资金不足的情况。

5.During the meeting, she fulminated about the company's poor management decisions.

在会议期间，她猛烈抨击公司的糟糕管理决策。

6.He would often fulminate about social injustice on his blog.

他常常在博客上猛烈抨击社会不公。

7.The critics fulminated against the film for its lack of originality.

评论家们猛烈抨击这部电影缺乏原创性。

8.She fulminated over the unfair treatment of workers in the factory.

她对工厂工人的不公待遇猛烈抨击。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, it is not uncommon for individuals to feel overwhelmed by various societal issues. From climate change to political unrest, many people find themselves in a state of constant agitation. This agitation often leads to moments where individuals may choose to fulminate (猛烈抨击) against the injustices they perceive in their surroundings. The act of fulminating can serve both as a cathartic release and as a rallying cry for others who share similar sentiments. However, it is essential to consider the impact of such expressions on both the speaker and the audience. When one fulminates about a particular issue, it often stems from a place of deep frustration. For instance, environmental activists frequently fulminate against corporations that prioritize profit over sustainability. Their passionate speeches and writings aim to raise awareness and inspire action among the public. While this fervor can be effective in mobilizing supporters, it can also alienate those who might otherwise be sympathetic to their cause. The tone of fulmination can sometimes come across as aggressive or dogmatic, which may lead to defensiveness rather than constructive dialogue. Moreover, the medium through which one chooses to fulminate plays a significant role in how the message is received. Social media platforms, for example, have become a popular venue for individuals to express their outrage. A single tweet or post can quickly go viral, reaching thousands or even millions of people. While this can amplify the message, it can also lead to a culture of outrage where nuance and thoughtful discussion are sacrificed for sensationalism. In this context, fulminating can sometimes contribute to a toxic environment where meaningful conversations are drowned out by noise. On the other hand, fulminating can also serve as a powerful tool for change. When done thoughtfully, it can shine a light on critical issues that require urgent attention. For example, activists who fulminate about human rights abuses can draw public attention to injustices that might otherwise go unnoticed. Their passionate pleas can influence policymakers and lead to tangible changes in legislation or social norms. In this sense, fulmination can be a catalyst for positive action, encouraging individuals to stand up for what they believe in. Ultimately, the effectiveness of fulminating lies in its balance. It is essential to combine passion with reason, allowing for emotional expression while also inviting constructive dialogue. When individuals fulminate, they should strive to articulate their concerns clearly and respectfully, fostering an environment where diverse opinions can coexist. By doing so, they can ensure that their message resonates with a broader audience and inspires meaningful change. In conclusion, while the act of fulminating has its place in societal discourse, it is crucial to approach it with mindfulness. Recognizing the potential consequences of our words and the manner in which we express our frustrations can lead to more productive conversations. Whether it is about environmental issues, social justice, or political reform, the way we fulminate can either build bridges or create divides. Therefore, let us choose to express our outrage in ways that encourage understanding and collaboration, ultimately driving us towards a better future.

在当今快节奏的世界中，个人常常会感到被各种社会问题所压倒。从气候变化到政治动荡，许多人发现自己处于持续的焦虑状态。这种焦虑通常会导致个人选择对周围的种种不公进行猛烈抨击。猛烈抨击的行为既可以作为一种宣泄，也可以作为对其他分享相似情绪的人的号召。然而，考虑这种表达对说话者和听众的影响是至关重要的。 当一个人对某个特定问题进行猛烈抨击时，通常源自深刻的挫败感。例如，环保活动家经常对那些优先考虑利润而非可持续发展的公司进行猛烈抨击。他们充满激情的演讲和著作旨在提高公众意识并激励行动。虽然这种热情在动员支持者方面可能有效，但也可能使那些本可能同情其事业的人感到疏远。猛烈抨击的语气有时可能显得激进或教条，这可能导致防御而非建设性的对话。 此外，个人选择进行猛烈抨击的媒介在信息接收中也起着重要作用。例如，社交媒体平台已成为个人表达愤怒的热门场所。一条推文或帖子可以迅速传播，达到成千上万甚至数百万人。虽然这可以放大信息，但也可能导致一种愤怒文化，在这种文化中，细微差别和深思熟虑的讨论被耸人听闻的内容所牺牲。在这种情况下，猛烈抨击有时可能助长了一种有毒的环境，在这个环境中，有意义的对话被噪音淹没。 另一方面，猛烈抨击也可以作为变革的有力工具。当以深思熟虑的方式进行时，它可以照亮需要紧急关注的关键问题。例如，猛烈抨击人权侵犯的活动家可以引起公众对可能被忽视的不公正现象的关注。他们的强烈呼吁可以影响政策制定者，并导致立法或社会规范的切实变化。从这个意义上说，猛烈抨击可以成为积极行动的催化剂，鼓励个人捍卫他们所信仰的事物。 最终，猛烈抨击的有效性在于其平衡。将激情与理性结合起来，让情感表达与建设性对话共存是至关重要的。当个人进行猛烈抨击时，他们应努力清晰而尊重地表达他们的关切，营造一个多元观点共存的环境。通过这样做，他们可以确保他们的信息能够引起更广泛受众的共鸣，并激励有意义的变革。 总之，尽管猛烈抨击在社会话语中占有一席之地，但以谨慎的态度来对待它是至关重要的。认识到我们的话语及表达愤怒的方式可能带来的后果，可以引导我们进行更具建设性的对话。无论是关于环境问题、社会正义还是政治改革，我们如何进行猛烈抨击都可能架起桥梁或制造分歧。因此，让我们选择以鼓励理解和合作的方式表达我们的愤怒，最终推动我们走向一个更美好的未来。