generalship

简明释义

英[ˈdʒenrəlʃɪp]美[ˈdʒenrəlʃɪp]

n. 将才；将官的职位；将军任期

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This study USES us Army doctrine on operational art as presented in FM 3-0 as the basis for analyzing and assessing PLA generalship during the Huai Hai Campaign.

本研究以美军在FM 3 - 0里面所说的关于战役法的条例为基础，分析和评估解放军在淮海战役期间的用兵、战略之手腕。

2.This study USES us Army doctrine on operational art as presented in FM 3-0 as the basis for analyzing and assessing PLA generalship during the Huai Hai Campaign.

本研究以美军在FM 3 - 0里面所说的关于战役法的条例为基础，分析和评估解放军在淮海战役期间的用兵、战略之手腕。

3.The European Union wants to shut the office of the high representative, a sort of governor-generalship, whose power has anyway more or less evaporated.

欧盟希望关闭其高级代表办公室，这一总督性质的机构的权利或多或少的被削弱了。

4.There is rarity, in the world — Shakespeare's talent, Napoleon's generalship and Newton's gift.

象莎士比亚那样的文才，拿破仑那样将略和牛顿那样的天赋是世界所罕见的。

5.Thus excelling at generalship is merely a question of exercising love and awesomeness.

所以善于带兵的人，就要善于掌握爱与威的运用。

6.The basic factors of leader's credit are: honesty, foresight, generalship, inspiring.

诚实、有远见、有才干、鼓舞人心是构成领导信用的基本要素。

7.He was distinctly pleased with his generalship: "I prepared an excellent order of battle."

他无疑对自己的将才很满意：“我制定了一个卓越的战斗计划。”

8.It needed a prodigious amount of generalship to marshal these forces.

要统帅这些队伍，需要惊人的将才。

9.Under the generalship of Rat, everybody was set to do something or to fetch something.

在水鼠兰特的指挥下，每个人都着手干点什么，或者去取点什么东西。

10.The success of the campaign was largely due to the general's exceptional generalship.

这场战役的成功主要归功于将军出色的统帅能力。

11.His generalship during the battle earned him a promotion.

他在战斗中的统帅能力使他获得了晋升。

12.Effective generalship requires both strategic planning and quick decision-making.

有效的统帅能力需要战略规划和快速决策。

13.The historian praised the general's generalship in his analysis of the war.

历史学家在分析这场战争时赞扬了将军的统帅能力。

14.In times of crisis, strong generalship can make all the difference.

在危机时期，强大的统帅能力能产生巨大的影响。

作文

Throughout history, the concept of leadership has been pivotal in shaping societies and nations. Among various forms of leadership, military leadership—or generalship—stands out as a crucial element in determining the outcomes of conflicts and wars. The term generalship refers to the skill and ability of a military leader to command and strategize effectively during battles. This essay explores the significance of generalship in historical contexts, its impact on modern warfare, and the qualities that define a great military leader. In ancient times, leaders like Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar exemplified exceptional generalship. Their military campaigns were not just about brute force; they involved intricate planning, understanding of terrain, and the ability to inspire troops. For instance, Alexander's tactics at the Battle of Gaugamela showcased his innovative approach to warfare, where he used the element of surprise and superior maneuvering to defeat a much larger Persian army. Such instances highlight that effective generalship requires not only tactical acumen but also psychological insight into both one’s own troops and the enemy. As we progress into the modern era, the principles of generalship have evolved, yet the core attributes remain relevant. Leaders such as General Dwight D. Eisenhower during World War II demonstrated that successful military leadership involves collaboration among various branches of the armed forces and allied nations. Eisenhower’s ability to coordinate the D-Day invasion is a testament to his strategic foresight and diplomatic skills. His emphasis on unity and clear communication among diverse groups underlines an essential quality of generalship: the ability to create a cohesive team that operates under a shared vision. Moreover, the study of generalship extends beyond the battlefield. It encompasses lessons applicable in various fields, including business and politics. Just as a general must assess risks and make quick decisions, leaders in corporate environments face similar challenges. They must navigate competition, market dynamics, and internal team dynamics. The adaptability and foresight exhibited by successful military leaders can serve as valuable models for contemporary leadership practices. However, it is important to note that generalship is not without its challenges. The moral implications of military decisions often weigh heavily on leaders. History has shown that poor decisions can lead to catastrophic consequences, not only for soldiers but also for civilians. Leaders like General William Tecumseh Sherman faced criticism for their strategies during the Civil War, which involved total war tactics that devastated regions. Thus, while generalship is about achieving victory, it also requires ethical considerations and an understanding of the broader impact of one’s actions. In conclusion, generalship is a multifaceted concept that plays a vital role in military history and beyond. The effectiveness of a military leader can significantly influence the course of events, making generalship a subject worthy of study and admiration. As we reflect on the qualities that define great military leaders, we recognize that the essence of generalship lies not only in tactical expertise but also in the ability to inspire, unite, and make ethical decisions in the face of adversity. Understanding these principles can enhance our appreciation for leadership in all areas of life, reminding us that the lessons of generalship resonate far beyond the battlefield.

在历史上，领导力的概念在塑造社会和国家方面至关重要。在各种形式的领导中，军事领导力——或称为generalship——作为决定冲突和战争结果的重要因素而脱颖而出。术语generalship指的是军事领导者在战斗中有效指挥和策划的技能和能力。本文探讨了generalship在历史背景下的重要性、它对现代战争的影响以及定义伟大军事领导者的品质。 在古代，亚历山大大帝和尤利乌斯·凯撒等领导者展现了卓越的generalship。他们的军事行动不仅仅是关于武力；还涉及复杂的规划、对地形的理解以及激励部队的能力。例如，亚历山大在高加米拉战役中的战术展示了他对战争的创新方法，他利用了意外和优越的机动性来击败一支人数众多的波斯军队。这些实例突显了有效的generalship不仅需要战术才能，还需要对自己部队和敌人的心理洞察。 随着我们进入现代时代，generalship的原则已经发展，但核心属性仍然相关。像第二次世界大战期间的德怀特·D·艾森豪威尔将军这样的领导者证明，成功的军事领导力涉及各军种和盟国之间的合作。艾森豪威尔协调诺曼底登陆的能力证明了他的战略远见和外交技巧。他强调不同群体之间的团结和清晰沟通，突显了generalship的一个基本品质：创造一个在共同愿景下运作的凝聚团队的能力。 此外，generalship的研究超越了战场。它包含适用于各个领域的经验教训，包括商业和政治。正如将军必须评估风险并迅速做出决策，企业环境中的领导者也面临类似的挑战。他们必须应对竞争、市场动态和内部团队动态。成功军事领导者展现出的适应能力和前瞻性可以作为当代领导实践的宝贵模型。 然而，值得注意的是，generalship并非没有挑战。军事决策的道德影响往往对领导者施加沉重的压力。历史已经表明，错误的决定可能导致灾难性的后果，不仅对士兵，对平民也是如此。像威廉·特库姆塞·谢尔曼将军这样的领导者因其在内战期间的战略而受到批评，这些战略涉及全面战争的战术，给地区带来了毁灭。因此，虽然generalship是为了取得胜利，但它也要求考虑伦理，并理解自身行为的更广泛影响。 总之，generalship是一个多方面的概念，在军事历史及其他领域发挥着至关重要的作用。军事领导者的有效性可以显著影响事件的进程，使得generalship成为值得研究和钦佩的主题。当我们反思定义伟大军事领导者的品质时，我们认识到generalship的本质不仅在于战术专长，还在于在逆境中激励、团结和做出伦理决策的能力。理解这些原则可以增强我们对各个领域领导力的欣赏，提醒我们generalship的经验教训远远超出了战场。