generals

简明释义

英[ˈdʒenərəlz]美[ˈdʒenrəlz]

n. 将军；上将（general 的复数）

v. 指挥（general 的单三形式）；统率

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.One of the most outstanding features at the beginning of this period was the prominence of Germanic generals in the high command of the Roman Imperial army.

这一时期初期最突出的特点之一是日耳曼将军在罗马帝国军队中的显著地位。

2.If his generals disagree, he will overrule them.

如果他的将领不同意，他将否决他们。

3.I have heard. Gather my generals.

听到了，集合我的将军们。

4.He has, indeed, the way of great generals.

他真还有点大将风度。

5.The wisdom of the retired generals and anti-war protesters conjoins.

退役将军们和反战示威者们的智慧相结合。

6.I've just been explaining the basic principles of strategy to my generals.

我刚才一直在向我的将军们解释战略的基本原则。

7.We would rather be generals than privates.

我们都想当将军而不想当士兵。

8.Generals are elected to every parliamentary seat.

将军们通过选举占据所有议会席位。

9.The generals of the army devised a new strategy for the upcoming battle.

军队的将领们制定了一个新的战略以应对即将到来的战斗。

10.In history, many famous generals have changed the course of wars.

在历史上，许多著名的将领改变了战争的进程。

11.The generals gathered to discuss the peace treaty negotiations.

这些将领聚集在一起讨论和平条约的谈判。

12.Some generals are known for their innovative tactics on the battlefield.

一些将领因其在战场上的创新战术而闻名。

13.The young officer aspired to become one of the great generals in history.

这位年轻的军官渴望成为历史上伟大的将领之一。

作文

Throughout history, the role of military leaders has been pivotal in shaping the outcomes of conflicts and wars. Among these leaders, the term generals (将军) stands out as a title that commands respect and authority. A general is not just a rank; it embodies the weight of responsibility, strategic thinking, and leadership skills necessary to guide troops into battle. The study of generals (将军) throughout history reveals much about the evolution of military tactics, the importance of morale, and the influence of leadership on the course of events. One of the most notable generals (将军) in history is Alexander the Great. His ability to inspire his men and devise innovative strategies led to the conquest of vast territories, stretching from Greece to India. Alexander's campaigns are often studied for their tactical brilliance and his capacity to adapt to different combat situations. He demonstrated that a successful general (将军) must possess not only military prowess but also the ability to understand and motivate the human element of warfare. In contrast, the American Civil War produced several generals (将军) whose decisions had significant consequences for the nation. General Ulysses S. Grant, for example, was known for his relentless pursuit of the enemy and his willingness to engage in large-scale battles. His strategies ultimately led to the Union's victory, demonstrating how a determined general (将军) can change the tide of war. On the other hand, General Robert E. Lee, commanding the Confederate forces, was renowned for his tactical ingenuity and ability to achieve victories despite being outnumbered. Their contrasting styles highlight the diverse approaches that generals (将军) can take in military leadership. The role of generals (将军) extends beyond mere battlefield tactics. They are often seen as symbols of national pride and identity. For instance, during World War II, General Dwight D. Eisenhower played a crucial role in planning and executing the Allied invasion of Europe. His leadership not only united various national forces but also exemplified the collaborative spirit necessary for success in a global conflict. Eisenhower's ability to work with leaders from different countries underscores the importance of diplomacy alongside military strategy in the role of a general (将军). Moreover, the modern battlefield presents new challenges for generals (将军). With advancements in technology, the nature of warfare has evolved dramatically. Today's generals (将军) must be well-versed in cyber warfare, unmanned systems, and intelligence operations. The complexity of contemporary conflicts requires a different set of skills, emphasizing the necessity for generals (将军) to adapt to changing environments and technologies. Leadership now involves understanding not just the physical aspects of warfare but also the psychological and informational dimensions. In conclusion, the study of generals (将军) offers valuable insights into the art of leadership and the complexities of military strategy. From historical figures like Alexander the Great and Ulysses S. Grant to modern military leaders, the impact of generals (将军) on the course of history cannot be overstated. Their ability to inspire, strategize, and adapt defines their legacy and continues to shape our understanding of military leadership today. As we reflect on the past and look toward the future, the lessons learned from generals (将军) will remain relevant in both military and civilian contexts.

纵观历史，军事领导者的角色在塑造冲突和战争的结果中至关重要。在这些领导者中，将军（generals）这一称谓尤为突出，它代表着尊重和权威。将军（generals）不仅仅是一个军衔；它承载着重大责任、战略思维和领导能力的重量，这些都是引导部队进入战斗所必需的。对历史上将军（generals）的研究揭示了军事战术的发展、人心士气的重要性以及领导力对事件进程的影响。 历史上最著名的将军（generals）之一是亚历山大大帝。他激励士兵和制定创新战略的能力使他征服了从希腊到印度的广大领土。亚历山大的战役因其战术的卓越和他适应不同战斗情况的能力而被广泛研究。他证明了成功的将军（generals）不仅必须具备军事才能，还必须能够理解并激励战争中的人性因素。 相较之下，美国内战产生了几位对国家有重大影响的将军（generals）。例如，尤利西斯·格兰特将军以其对敌人的不懈追击和参与大规模战斗的意愿而闻名。他的战略最终导致了联邦的胜利，展示了一位决心坚定的将军（generals）如何改变战争的潮流。另一方面，指挥南方联盟军队的罗伯特·李将军因其战术的独创性和在人数劣势下取得胜利的能力而受到推崇。他们截然不同的风格突显了将军（generals）在军事领导中可以采取的多样化方法。 将军（generals）的角色不仅限于战场战术。他们常常被视为国家自豪感和身份的象征。例如，在第二次世界大战期间，德怀特·D·艾森豪威尔将军在规划和执行盟军入侵欧洲中发挥了关键作用。他的领导不仅团结了各国军队，还体现了在全球冲突中取得成功所需的合作精神。艾森豪威尔与不同国家领导人合作的能力强调了在将军（generals）的角色中，外交与军事战略并重的重要性。 此外，现代战场给将军（generals）带来了新的挑战。随着科技的进步，战争的性质发生了剧烈变化。今天的将军（generals）必须精通网络战争、无人系统和情报行动。当代冲突的复杂性要求将军（generals）具备不同的技能，强调了将军（generals）适应变化环境和技术的必要性。领导力现在不仅涉及战争的物理方面，还涉及心理和信息维度。 总之，研究将军（generals）为我们提供了对领导艺术和军事战略复杂性的宝贵见解。从亚历山大大帝和尤利西斯·格兰特到现代军事领导者，将军（generals）对历史进程的影响不容小觑。他们激励、策划和适应的能力定义了他们的遗产，并继续塑造我们对当今军事领导力的理解。当我们反思过去并展望未来，从将军（generals）身上学到的经验教训将在军事和民用领域中保持相关性。