hagiarchy
简明释义
n. 圣人政治;圣人之间的尊卑次序组织
复 数 h a g i a r c h i e s
英英释义
A system of government or leadership by saints or holy figures. | 由圣人或神圣人物领导的政府或领导体系。 |
单词用法
同义词
等级制度 | 教会在严格的等级制度下运作。 | ||
神权政治 | 在神权政治中,宗教领袖掌握政治权力。 | ||
神职人员 | 神职人员在社区中发挥着重要作用。 |
反义词
世俗主义 | The rise of secularism in modern society has challenged traditional hagiarchies. | 现代社会世俗主义的兴起挑战了传统的圣人统治。 | |
无神论统治 | An atheocracy would reject the principles of hagiarchy entirely. | 无神论统治将完全拒绝圣人统治的原则。 |
例句
1.In a society governed by a hagiarchy, leaders are often revered as saints.
在一个由圣人统治的社会中,领导者常被尊崇为圣人。
2.The hagiarchy of the organization made it difficult for new ideas to be accepted.
该组织的圣人统治使得新想法难以被接受。
3.Many cultures have a form of hagiarchy where religious figures hold significant power.
许多文化中都有一种圣人统治,宗教人物拥有重要权力。
4.Critics argue that a hagiarchy stifles creativity and innovation.
批评者认为,圣人统治压制了创造力和创新。
5.The hagiarchy within the church often leads to the exclusion of dissenting voices.
教会内部的圣人统治常常导致异议声音的排斥。
作文
In today’s society, the concept of leadership and authority often comes under scrutiny. One term that encapsulates a specific form of leadership is hagiarchy, which refers to a system of governance or leadership by saints or holy figures. This idea raises intriguing questions about the nature of authority and the qualities that make someone worthy of leadership. The term itself is derived from the Greek words 'hagio' meaning holy, and 'archy' meaning rule or government. Therefore, a hagiarchy can be understood as a rule by those deemed sacred or virtuous. The implications of a hagiarchy are profound. In many religious contexts, leaders are often viewed as divinely appointed individuals who possess a unique connection with the divine. These leaders are expected to embody moral excellence and serve as examples for their followers. For instance, in various spiritual traditions, such as Buddhism or Christianity, leaders are often seen as saints or enlightened beings who guide their communities toward higher moral grounds. This notion elevates the leaders beyond mere mortals, placing them on a pedestal where their decisions and actions are believed to reflect divine will. However, the concept of hagiarchy is not without its challenges. When authority is vested in individuals based solely on their perceived holiness, it can lead to a lack of accountability. Followers may hesitate to question or criticize their leaders, fearing that doing so would be tantamount to questioning the divine. This can create an environment where abuses of power go unchecked. History is replete with examples of leaders who, despite their saintly images, have engaged in unethical behavior. Such contradictions highlight the potential pitfalls of a hagiarchy. Moreover, the idea of leadership based on holiness can also exclude capable leaders who may not fit the traditional mold of a saint. This exclusion can be detrimental to communities that require practical and effective leadership in times of crisis. While it is essential to have leaders who inspire moral integrity, it is equally important to recognize that effective governance often requires a diverse set of skills that may not align with the characteristics typically associated with holiness. In contemporary discussions about leadership, the concept of hagiarchy prompts us to reconsider what qualities we value in our leaders. Should we prioritize spiritual virtue over practical experience? Can a leader be effective while also being relatable and human? These questions are vital as we navigate the complexities of modern governance. In conclusion, while the idea of hagiarchy offers a fascinating lens through which to view leadership, it also serves as a reminder of the importance of balance. Leadership should not solely rest on the shoulders of those who are deemed holy; rather, it should encompass a range of qualities that include wisdom, empathy, and accountability. As we strive for effective leadership in our communities, let us remember that the most impactful leaders are those who can bridge the gap between the sacred and the practical, guiding us with both integrity and competence.
在当今社会,领导和权威的概念常常受到审视。一个能够概括特定形式领导的术语是hagiarchy,它指的是由圣人或神圣人物领导的治理体系。这个想法引发了关于权威的本质以及使某人值得领导的品质的有趣问题。这个术语本身源自希腊词汇“hagio”,意思是神圣的,以及“archy”,意思是统治或政府。因此,hagiarchy可以理解为由那些被认为神圣或有德行的人所统治。 hagiarchy的含义深远。在许多宗教背景下,领导者常常被视为神圣任命的个人,他们与神灵有着独特的联系。这些领导者被期望体现道德卓越,并作为追随者的榜样。例如,在佛教或基督教等各种精神传统中,领导者常常被视为圣人或开悟的存在,他们引导社区走向更高的道德境界。这种观念将领导者提升到超越普通人的地位,使他们的决定和行为被认为反映了神圣意志。 然而,hagiarchy的概念并非没有挑战。当权力仅仅基于个人的神圣形象而赋予时,可能会导致缺乏问责制。追随者可能会犹豫质疑或批评他们的领导者,担心这样做会等同于质疑神圣。这可能创造出一种滥用权力无法得到制止的环境。历史上充满了尽管拥有圣人形象的领导者,却参与不道德行为的例子。这些矛盾突显了hagiarchy的潜在陷阱。 此外,基于神圣的领导理念也可能排除那些不符合传统圣人模式的有能力的领导者。这种排斥可能对在危机时期需要实际和有效领导的社区造成损害。虽然拥有能激励道德完整性的领导者至关重要,但同样重要的是要认识到,有效治理通常需要一系列可能与神圣性特征不符的技能。 在当代关于领导力的讨论中,hagiarchy的概念促使我们重新考虑我们在领导者身上重视的品质。我们应该优先考虑精神美德而不是实践经验吗?领导者是否可以在保持可亲和人性化的同时有效?这些问题在我们应对现代治理的复杂性时至关重要。 总之,虽然hagiarchy的概念提供了一个有趣的视角来观察领导力,但它也提醒我们保持平衡的重要性。领导力不应仅仅落在那些被认为神圣的人的肩上;相反,它应当包括一系列的品质,包括智慧、同情心和问责制。当我们在社区中努力寻求有效的领导时,让我们记住,最具影响力的领导者是那些能够在神圣与实际之间架起桥梁,以诚信和能力引导我们的领导者。
文章标题:hagiarchy的意思是什么
文章链接:https://www.liuxue886.cn/danci/378219.html
本站文章均为原创,未经授权请勿用于任何商业用途
发表评论