halons

简明释义

英[/ˈheɪlɒnz/]美[/ˈheɪlənz/]

卤盐

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In the existing methods of burning and processing of such substances is not appropriate, because the CFC, halons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other substances with high heat stability.

在已有的方法中焚烧处理这类物质不太合适，因为氟里昂，哈龙，多环芳烃等物质具有很高的耐热稳定性。

2.In the existing methods of burning and processing of such substances is not appropriate, because the CFC, halons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other substances with high heat stability.

在已有的方法中焚烧处理这类物质不太合适，因为氟里昂，哈龙，多环芳烃等物质具有很高的耐热稳定性。

3.To find a practical and economical way to degradation of organic pollutants, as well as H2SSO2CS2 hydrocarbons, freon, halons and other substances is an important task.

寻求一种切实可行又经济实惠的方法来降解有机污物以及H2SSO2CS2碳氢化合物，氟里昂，哈龙等物质是一项很有意义的工作。

4.The destruction of ozone molecules in the ozone layer by chemical reaction with materials released from human activities, including chlorofluorocarbons and halons.

从人类活动中释放出来的物质(包括氟氯烃和卤代烷哈龙)同臭氧层中的臭氧分子发生化学变化，导致其破坏。

5.EBM aerosol fire extinguishing agent is a new type of fire extinguishing agents of high efficiency, its efficiency is higher than that of Halons.

ebm气溶胶灭火剂是一种新型高效灭火剂，其灭火效率高于哈龙类灭火剂。

6.However, due to the emergence of CFCs and halons so great damage to the ozone layer.

但是由于氟利昂和哈龙的出现，使臭氧层受到很大的破坏。

7.The use of halons in fire extinguishers has been banned due to their harmful effects on the ozone layer.

由于卤代烃对臭氧层的有害影响，灭火器中使用卤代烃已被禁止。

8.Many industries are looking for alternatives to halons for their fire suppression systems.

许多行业正在寻找替代卤代烃的灭火系统。

9.Firefighters must be trained to handle situations involving halons safely.

消防员必须接受培训，以安全处理涉及卤代烃的情况。

10.The production of halons was phased out under international agreements to protect the environment.

根据国际协议，卤代烃的生产逐步停止，以保护环境。

11.Some aircraft still use halons in their fire suppression systems, despite the ban.

尽管禁止，一些飞机仍在其灭火系统中使用卤代烃。

作文

Halons are a group of chemical compounds that contain bromine, fluorine, and carbon. They were widely used in fire suppression systems due to their effectiveness in extinguishing fires without leaving residue. However, the environmental impact of halons (哈龙) has raised significant concerns over the years. Specifically, halons (哈龙) are known to deplete the ozone layer, which protects our planet from harmful ultraviolet radiation. As a result, their production and use have been phased out under the Montreal Protocol, an international treaty aimed at protecting the ozone layer. Despite the ban on new halons (哈龙), they remain in use in some older fire suppression systems, particularly in aviation and military applications. This is because halons (哈龙) are highly effective in stopping fires that occur in sensitive environments where water or other agents might cause damage. For instance, in aircraft, the use of halons (哈龙) can be crucial for protecting electronic equipment and preventing catastrophic failures during emergencies. The transition away from halons (哈龙) has prompted researchers and engineers to develop alternative fire suppression agents. These alternatives aim to provide similar effectiveness while being more environmentally friendly. Some of these substitutes include clean agents like FM-200 and Novec 1230, which do not harm the ozone layer and have a lower global warming potential. The development of these alternatives highlights the importance of balancing fire safety with environmental responsibility. In addition to their environmental implications, the use of halons (哈龙) also raises questions about safety and health. Exposure to halons (哈龙) can pose health risks to humans, particularly if inhaled in large quantities. Therefore, proper handling and disposal of equipment containing halons (哈龙) are crucial to mitigate potential hazards. Fire safety professionals must be adequately trained to manage systems that still utilize halons (哈龙) to ensure the safety of personnel and the environment alike. As we move forward, it is essential to continue researching and implementing sustainable fire suppression methods that do not compromise our planet's health. The legacy of halons (哈龙) serves as a reminder of the need for responsible chemical management and the impact human activities can have on the environment. By understanding the history and effects of halons (哈龙), we can make informed decisions about fire safety practices and strive towards a greener future. In conclusion, halons (哈龙) played a significant role in fire suppression technology but also came with substantial environmental costs. Their phase-out marks a critical step in addressing ozone depletion and promoting sustainability. As we seek to protect both lives and the environment, it is imperative that we explore and adopt safer alternatives to halons (哈龙) while maintaining effective fire safety measures. The journey towards a more sustainable approach to fire suppression continues, reminding us of the delicate balance between safety and ecological integrity.

哈龙是一类含有溴、氟和碳的化学化合物。由于其在灭火方面的有效性，哈龙被广泛用于灭火系统中，而不会留下残留物。然而，哈龙的环境影响多年来引起了重大关注。具体而言，哈龙被认为会破坏臭氧层，而臭氧层保护着我们的星球免受有害紫外线辐射的侵害。因此，根据《蒙特利尔议定书》，其生产和使用已逐步停止，该协议旨在保护臭氧层。 尽管新哈龙的生产被禁，但它们仍然在一些旧的灭火系统中使用，尤其是在航空和军事应用中。这是因为哈龙在敏感环境中扑灭火灾的有效性至关重要，在这些环境中，水或其他灭火剂可能会造成损害。例如，在飞机上，使用哈龙对于保护电子设备和防止在紧急情况下发生灾难性故障至关重要。 向哈龙过渡的过程促使研究人员和工程师开发替代灭火剂。这些替代品旨在提供类似的有效性，同时对环境更友好。其中一些替代品包括FM-200和Novec 1230等清洁剂，它们不会损害臭氧层，并具有较低的全球变暖潜力。这些替代品的发展突显了平衡消防安全与环境责任的重要性。 除了环境影响外，使用哈龙还引发了关于安全和健康的问题。接触哈龙可能对人类构成健康风险，特别是在大量吸入的情况下。因此，妥善处理和处置含有哈龙的设备对于减轻潜在危害至关重要。消防安全专业人员必须接受充分培训，以管理仍然使用哈龙的系统，以确保人员和环境的安全。 展望未来，继续研究和实施可持续的灭火方法至关重要，这些方法不妨碍我们星球的健康。哈龙的遗产提醒我们需要负责任的化学管理以及人类活动对环境的影响。通过了解哈龙的历史和影响，我们可以就消防安全实践做出明智的决定，并努力实现更绿色的未来。 总之，哈龙在灭火技术中发挥了重要作用，但也带来了巨大的环境成本。它们的逐步淘汰标志着解决臭氧消耗和促进可持续发展的关键一步。当我们努力保护生命与环境时，必须探索并采用比哈龙更安全的替代品，同时保持有效的消防安全措施。通往更可持续灭火方法的旅程仍在继续，提醒我们安全与生态完整性之间的微妙平衡。