handcuff

简明释义

英[ˈhændkʌf]美[ˈhændkʌf]

n. 手铐

v. 给……戴上手铐；限制

复 数 h a n d c u f f s

第 三 人 称 单 数 h a n d c u f f s

现 在 分 词 h a n d c u f f i n g

过 去 式 h a n d c u f f e d

过 去 分 词 h a n d c u f f e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The room is laid out like a prison cell, with iron bars, height marks and handcuff tools.

房间按照监狱的格局布置，有铁栏，身高线，还有玩具手铐。

2.The hinged collar locked around Wells' neck like a giant handcuff.

这个用铰链连接的颈圈像个巨型手铐一样拷在威尔士的脖子上。

3.The other side of benevolence and righteousness is the handcuff and fetters, devised to trap people in guilt.

仁义的另一层意义，其实就是脚镣手铐，专门陷人于不义以及罪恶之中。

4."Don't you worry about them, Miss," said the other man. "All marshals handcuff themselves to their prisoners to keep them from getting away."

“你别担心这些手铐，小姐，”另外那人说：“警官怕犯人逃脱，全是这样把自己和犯人铐在一起的。”

5.During those times, the scouts would handcuff prisoners to a tree, but only for a few minutes and “in the shade.

每当这种时候，巡防队会把俘虏拷在树上，但是只有几分钟而且是“在树荫下。”

6.You don't really handcuff guys to water pipes do you?

你不会真的把人拷在水管上吧？

7.They drag you to a windowless room, sometimes handcuff you to a chair.

他们会把你脱到一个没窗户的屋子里，有时候还把你拷在椅子上。

8.They tried to handcuff him but, despite his injuries, he fought his way free.

他们试图用手铐铐住他，但尽管他受了伤，还是奋力挣脱了。

9."Don't you worry about them, Miss," said the other man. "All marshals handcuff themselves to their prisoners to keep them from getting away."

“你别担心这些手铐，小姐，”另外那人说：“警官怕犯人逃脱，全是这样把自己和犯人铐在一起的。”

10.The police officer had to put the suspect in handcuffs to ensure he wouldn't escape.

警察不得不把嫌疑犯用手铐铐住，以确保他不会逃跑。

11.During the arrest, the criminal was placed in handcuffs as a precaution.

在逮捕过程中，罪犯被作为预防措施戴上了手铐。

12.She felt a rush of adrenaline when the handcuffs clicked shut around her wrists.

当手铐在她的手腕上咔嗒一声锁上时，她感到一阵肾上腺素涌动。

13.The detective carefully removed the handcuffs after questioning the suspect.

侦探在审问嫌疑犯后小心地卸下了手铐。

14.In movies, you often see heroes escaping from handcuffs in dramatic ways.

在电影中，你常常看到英雄以戏剧性的方式从手铐中逃脱。

作文

The concept of a handcuff is often associated with law enforcement and the act of restraining an individual. When we think of a handcuff, we typically envision two metal rings connected by a chain, designed to secure a person's wrists together. This tool has been used for centuries to ensure that suspects cannot escape or pose a threat to officers during an arrest. However, the implications of using handcuffs extend beyond mere physical restraint; they also raise important questions about personal freedom, justice, and human rights. In many societies, the use of handcuffs is a necessary part of maintaining law and order. Police officers rely on them to safely transport individuals who may be dangerous or uncooperative. For example, imagine a scenario where a suspect is being arrested for a serious crime. The officer must ensure not only their safety but also the safety of the public. In this context, handcuffs serve as a vital tool that allows officers to perform their duties effectively. However, the use of handcuffs can also be controversial. There have been numerous cases where individuals have been improperly restrained, leading to accusations of excessive force or abuse of power. This raises concerns about how handcuffs are applied in different situations. Are they always necessary? Should they be used on individuals who are not a threat? These questions are crucial in discussions about police reform and the treatment of suspects within the justice system. Moreover, the psychological impact of being placed in handcuffs should not be overlooked. For many, the experience can be traumatic and dehumanizing. It serves as a stark reminder of their loss of freedom and autonomy. The mere sight of handcuffs can evoke fear and anxiety, making it clear that they symbolize not just physical restraint, but also a profound social stigma. This can affect an individual's mental health and their perception of law enforcement long after the incident has passed. In addition to their use in policing, handcuffs have also found their way into popular culture. Movies and television shows often depict dramatic scenes involving handcuffs, which can glamorize or sensationalize their use. This portrayal can influence public perception, leading to misconceptions about the role of law enforcement and the justice system. It is essential to approach these representations critically, recognizing that they can shape societal attitudes toward crime and punishment. Furthermore, the evolution of handcuffs over time reflects broader changes in society's approach to criminal justice. Modern handcuffs are often designed with safety features to prevent injury to both the officer and the individual being restrained. Innovations in materials and design have made them more effective and humane, highlighting a growing awareness of the need for ethical considerations in law enforcement practices. In conclusion, the term handcuff encompasses much more than a simple tool for restraint. It represents a complex interplay of safety, authority, and civil liberties. As society continues to grapple with issues of justice and equality, the way we understand and implement the use of handcuffs will undoubtedly evolve. It is our responsibility to engage in these discussions, ensuring that the application of handcuffs is fair, just, and respectful of individual rights. Only then can we hope to create a system that truly serves and protects all members of society.

“手铐”这一概念通常与执法和限制个人行为的行为相关。当我们想到“手铐”时，通常会想象两个金属环通过链子连接在一起，旨在将一个人的手腕锁在一起。这种工具已经被使用了几个世纪，以确保嫌疑人无法逃脱或在逮捕期间对警官构成威胁。然而，使用“手铐”的含义超出了单纯的身体约束；它们也引发了关于个人自由、正义和人权的重要问题。 在许多社会中，使用“手铐”是维护法律和秩序的必要部分。警察依赖它们来安全地运输可能危险或不合作的个人。例如，想象一个场景，一个嫌疑人因严重罪行被逮捕。警官必须确保他们的安全，同时也要确保公众的安全。在这种情况下，“手铐”作为一种重要工具，使警官能够有效地执行他们的职责。 然而，使用“手铐”也可能引发争议。有许多案例表明，个人被不当限制，导致对过度使用武力或滥用权力的指控。这引发了对在不同情况下如何使用“手铐”的关注。它们是否总是必要的？应该在没有威胁的个体身上使用吗？这些问题在关于警务改革和司法系统中嫌疑人待遇的讨论中至关重要。 此外，被施加“手铐”的心理影响也不容忽视。对于许多人来说，这种经历可能是创伤性的和非人性化的。它清楚地提醒他们失去自由和自主权。仅仅看到“手铐”就会引发恐惧和焦虑，表明它们不仅象征着身体限制，也象征着深刻的社会污名。这可能会影响个人的心理健康以及他们对执法的看法，远在事件发生之后。 除了在执法中的使用外，“手铐”还进入了流行文化。电影和电视节目经常描绘涉及“手铐”的戏剧性场景，这可能会使其使用变得光鲜或耸人听闻。这种描述可能会影响公众的看法，导致对执法和司法系统的误解。重要的是要批判性地看待这些表现，认识到它们可以塑造社会对犯罪和惩罚的态度。 此外，“手铐”的演变反映了社会对刑事司法方法的更广泛变化。现代“手铐”通常设计有安全特性，以防止对警官和被限制个人的伤害。材料和设计的创新使它们更加有效和人性化，突显了对执法实践中伦理考虑日益增长的意识。 总之，术语“手铐”包含的内容远不止是简单的约束工具。它代表了安全、权威和公民自由之间复杂的相互作用。随着社会继续努力解决正义和平等的问题，我们对“手铐”的理解和实施方式无疑会不断发展。我们有责任参与这些讨论，确保“手铐”的应用是公平的、正义的，并尊重个人权利。只有这样，我们才能希望创造一个真正为社会所有成员服务和保护的系统。