illiberally

简明释义

英[ɪˈlɪbərəli]美[ɪˈlɪbərli]

adv. 吝啬地；小气地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The government imposed restrictions on freedom of speech, acting illiberally 不宽容地 towards dissenting voices.

政府对言论自由施加了限制，对不同意见采取了不宽容地态度。

2.In his speech, he criticized the illiberal 不自由的 policies that stifle creativity and innovation.

在他的演讲中，他批评了那些扼杀创造力和创新的不自由的政策。

3.The school administration acted illiberally 不宽容地 when they banned certain books from the library.

学校管理层在禁止某些书籍进入图书馆时表现得不宽容地。

4.Many countries have faced backlash for their illiberal 不自由的 immigration policies.

许多国家因其不自由的移民政策而面临抵制。

5.The illiberal 不自由的 approach to governance has led to widespread discontent among citizens.

这种不自由的治理方式导致公民普遍不满。

作文

In today's world, where information flows freely and diverse opinions are readily available, it is crucial to recognize the importance of open-mindedness. However, there are still many instances where individuals or groups behave illiberally, meaning they act in a manner that restricts freedom and tolerates little to no diversity of thought. This behavior can manifest in various forms, such as censorship, discrimination, or intolerance towards differing viewpoints. The consequences of acting illiberally can be far-reaching, affecting not only personal relationships but also societal progress as a whole. One prominent example of illiberal behavior is seen in political systems that suppress dissenting voices. In many countries, governments have enacted laws that limit freedom of speech, often justifying these restrictions under the guise of national security or public order. Such actions lead to an environment where citizens feel unsafe to express their opinions, resulting in a homogenized society that stifles creativity and innovation. When people are afraid to speak out, the potential for progress diminishes significantly, as new ideas and perspectives are essential for growth. Moreover, illiberally restricting access to information can hinder educational development. In an age where knowledge is power, limiting what individuals can learn or discuss creates a population that is less informed and less capable of critical thinking. Educational institutions should promote a culture of inquiry and debate, encouraging students to explore various viewpoints. When institutions adopt an illiberal approach, they fail to prepare students for the complexities of the real world, where differing opinions are abundant. The impact of illiberal attitudes is not confined to politics or education; it also seeps into social interactions. When individuals refuse to engage with those who hold opposing views, they contribute to a culture of division and hostility. Engaging with diverse perspectives is vital for fostering understanding and empathy. By acting illiberally, people miss out on opportunities to learn from one another and to build bridges across ideological divides. Furthermore, the rise of social media has exacerbated illiberal tendencies. Online platforms often create echo chambers where users are exposed only to opinions that align with their own. This phenomenon reinforces existing beliefs and discourages healthy debate. When individuals curate their online experiences to avoid discomfort, they contribute to a culture that values conformity over authenticity. As a result, society becomes more polarized, making it increasingly challenging to find common ground. To combat illiberal behavior, it is essential to cultivate a mindset that values diversity and encourages dialogue. Individuals must strive to be more open-minded, actively seeking out differing perspectives and engaging in constructive discussions. By doing so, we can foster a culture that celebrates differences rather than fearing them. It is also important for institutions, whether educational, political, or social, to promote policies that encourage inclusivity and protect freedom of expression. In conclusion, the dangers of acting illiberally are significant and far-reaching. Whether in politics, education, or social interactions, restricting freedom of thought and expression undermines the very foundations of a progressive society. By embracing open-mindedness and promoting diverse perspectives, we can work towards a more inclusive and harmonious world. Only then can we truly thrive as individuals and as a collective society, free from the shackles of illiberal thinking.

在当今这个信息自由流动、各种观点随时可得的世界中，认识到开放思想的重要性至关重要。然而，仍然有许多情况下，个人或团体以不自由的方式行事，这意味着他们以限制自由和容忍几乎没有思想多样性的方式行事。这种行为可以以多种形式表现出来，例如审查、歧视或对不同观点的不宽容。以不自由的方式行事的后果可能是深远的，不仅影响个人关系，还影响整个社会的进步。 一个显著的不自由行为的例子是在压制异议声音的政治系统中。在许多国家，政府颁布了限制言论自由的法律，通常以国家安全或公共秩序为借口来辩解这些限制。这种行为导致公民感到不安全，无法表达自己的意见，从而形成一个同质化的社会，扼杀创造力和创新。当人们害怕发声时，进步的潜力显著减少，因为新思想和新视角对于成长至关重要。 此外，不自由地限制信息获取会阻碍教育发展。在知识就是力量的时代，限制个人能够学习或讨论的内容，会造成一个信息匮乏且缺乏批判性思维能力的人口。教育机构应该促进探究和辩论的文化，鼓励学生探索各种观点。当机构采取不自由的方式时，他们未能为学生准备好面对现实世界的复杂性，而现实世界中存在着丰富的不同意见。 不自由态度的影响并不仅限于政治或教育；它还渗透到社会互动中。当个人拒绝与持不同观点的人进行交流时，他们助长了分裂和敌意的文化。接触不同的观点对于促进理解和同情至关重要。通过以不自由的方式行事，人们错过了互相学习和跨越意识形态鸿沟建立桥梁的机会。 此外，社交媒体的兴起加剧了不自由的倾向。在线平台通常会创建回音室，用户只接触与自己意见一致的观点。这种现象强化了现有信念，并阻碍了健康的辩论。当个人精心策划自己的在线体验以避免不适时，他们助长了一种重视一致性而非真实性的文化。因此，社会变得更加极化，使得寻找共同点变得愈加困难。 为了对抗不自由的行为，培养一种重视多样性和鼓励对话的心态至关重要。个人必须努力变得更加开放，主动寻求不同的观点并参与建设性的讨论。通过这样做，我们可以促进一种庆祝差异而不是畏惧差异的文化。对于教育、政治或社会等机构来说，推动鼓励包容性和保护言论自由的政策也同样重要。 总之，以不自由的方式行事的危险是显著且深远的。无论是在政治、教育还是社会互动中，限制思想和表达的自由都破坏了进步社会的基础。通过拥抱开放思想和促进多样化的观点，我们可以朝着一个更加包容和和谐的世界努力。只有这样，我们才能真正作为个人和集体社会蓬勃发展，摆脱不自由思维的束缚。