impartible

简明释义

英[ɪmˈpɑːtəb(ə)l]美[ɪmˈpɑrtəbl]

adj. 不可分的；不能分割的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The customs of impartible inheritance and partible inheritance of land lead to emerge the nuclear family and noe-core family in different areas.

土地的不可分割继承和可分割继承导致不同地区核心家庭与非核心家庭的出现。

2.The customs of impartible inheritance and partible inheritance of land lead to emerge the nuclear family and noe-core family in different areas.

土地的不可分割继承和可分割继承导致不同地区核心家庭与非核心家庭的出现。

3.There is impartible relationship between law and belief. Law and belief are absolutely necessary means of social control.

法据此与信仰有着不可分割的关系：信仰与法都是社会控制的必不可少的手段；

4.The knowledge shared in this workshop is truly impartible.

这次研讨会分享的知识是非常不可分割的。

5.In some cultures, wisdom is considered impartible and must be passed down through generations.

在某些文化中，智慧被视为不可分割的，必须代代相传。

6.The essence of art is often impartible, making it difficult to define.

艺术的本质往往是不可分割的，这使得它难以定义。

7.Certain cultural traditions are impartible and should be preserved.

某些文化传统是不可分割的，应该被保留。

8.The bond between family members can feel impartible despite physical distance.

家庭成员之间的纽带尽管有身体上的距离，仍然可以感受到不可分割的。

作文

In our modern society, the concept of ownership has evolved significantly over time. One term that encapsulates a unique aspect of property and rights is impartible. The word impartible refers to something that cannot be divided or shared among multiple parties. This notion is particularly relevant when discussing inheritance laws and the distribution of assets among heirs. In many cultures, certain types of property are considered impartible, meaning they must remain intact and undivided, often passed down through generations in their entirety. For example, in some traditional societies, family estates or ancestral lands are viewed as impartible entities. This means that instead of splitting the land among siblings after the death of the parents, the entire estate is given to one heir, typically the eldest son. This practice helps preserve the integrity and value of the property, preventing fragmentation that could diminish its worth. However, this approach can lead to conflicts among siblings who may feel entitled to a share of the inheritance. The impartible nature of such assets can create tension, as not all family members agree with the decision to keep the property whole. Moreover, the impartible concept is not limited to physical property. Intellectual property rights, for instance, can also be seen through the lens of impartible ownership. When a creator produces a work—be it a novel, a painting, or a piece of music—the rights associated with that work are typically considered impartible. This means that the creator retains full ownership and control over their creation, unable to divide or share those rights without explicit agreement. This ensures that the creator can benefit from their work without the risk of dilution of their rights. In contrast, the idea of impartible ownership can be challenged in contemporary discussions about equality and fairness. Critics argue that such practices can perpetuate inequality, as wealth and resources become concentrated in the hands of a few individuals. They advocate for more equitable distribution methods that allow for shared ownership among heirs, thereby fostering a sense of community and collaboration. This perspective highlights the tension between traditional views of impartible property and modern ideals of fairness and equality. As we navigate these complex issues, it is essential to recognize the implications of impartible ownership on both personal and societal levels. Understanding the nuances of this concept can help us appreciate the historical context of property rights while also considering the need for reform in our current systems. Ultimately, the discussion surrounding impartible assets raises important questions about how we define ownership and the responsibilities that come with it. In conclusion, the term impartible serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in property ownership and inheritance. Whether in the context of land, resources, or intellectual property, the idea of impartible rights invites us to reflect on the balance between tradition and progress. As we move forward, it is crucial to engage in open dialogues about these issues, seeking solutions that honor the past while embracing the future.

在我们现代社会，所有权的概念随着时间的推移发生了显著变化。一个能够概括财产和权利独特方面的术语是impartible。这个词impartible指的是某物无法在多个方之间分割或共享。这一概念在讨论继承法和资产在继承人之间的分配时尤为相关。在许多文化中，某些类型的财产被视为impartible，意味着它们必须保持完整而不被分割，通常以其整体形式传递给后代。 例如，在一些传统社会中，家族庄园或祖传土地被视为impartible实体。这意味着，在父母去世后，而不是将土地分给兄弟姐妹，整个庄园将交给一个继承人，通常是长子。这种做法有助于维护财产的完整性和价值，防止可能会降低其价值的分割。然而，这种方法可能导致兄弟姐妹之间的冲突，他们可能会觉得有权获得继承的一部分。这样的资产的impartible性质可能会造成紧张局势，因为并非所有家庭成员都同意保持财产完整的决定。 此外，impartible的概念不仅限于物理财产。知识产权，例如，也可以通过impartible所有权的视角来看待。当创作者创作出一部作品——无论是小说、绘画还是音乐作品——与该作品相关的权利通常被视为impartible。这意味着创作者保留对其创作的完全所有权和控制权，无法在没有明确协议的情况下分割或共享这些权利。这确保了创作者能够从他们的作品中受益，而不会面临权利稀释的风险。 相比之下，impartible所有权的理念在当代关于平等和公平的讨论中受到挑战。批评者认为，这种做法可能会加剧不平等，因为财富和资源集中在少数个人手中。他们倡导更公平的分配方法，使继承人之间能够共享所有权，从而促进社区和合作的意识。这一观点突显了传统的impartible财产观念与现代公平和平等理想之间的紧张关系。 在我们应对这些复杂问题时，重要的是要认识到impartible所有权对个人和社会层面的影响。理解这一概念的细微差别可以帮助我们欣赏财产权的历史背景，同时也考虑到我们当前系统中改革的必要性。最终，围绕impartible资产的讨论提出了关于我们如何定义所有权以及与之相关的责任的重要问题。 总之，术语impartible提醒我们财产所有权和继承中固有的复杂性。无论是在土地、资源还是知识产权的背景下，impartible权利的理念邀请我们反思传统与进步之间的平衡。随着我们的前进，进行关于这些问题的开放对话，寻求尊重过去同时拥抱未来的解决方案至关重要。