impiety

简明释义

英[ɪmˈpaɪəti]美[ɪmˈpaɪəti]

n. 不虔诚；不尊敬；无信仰；无信心

复 数 i m p i e t i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.All these people who have been arguing against Hobbes accused Locke too, of impiety.

所有不同意霍布斯观点的人，也开始指责洛克的不敬行为。

2.Arachne filled her canvas with similar subjects, wonderfully well done, but strongly marking her presumption and impiety.

阿拉喀涅用类似的主题填满了她的画布。

3.It is this Socrates who is brought up on charges of corruption and impiety yet none of this quite answers the question of what is the nature of Socrates' crime.

这是被控腐化，与亵渎神明的苏格拉底，但这都未能完整地回答，苏格拉底所背罪名的本质究竟为何。

4.He had to leave his home because of impiety.

因为不孝，他不得不离开家。

5.Socrates is charged as we will see by the city for corrupting the youth! And impiety toward the Gods right?

苏格拉底遭到指控，如我们所知，他遭到城邦指控腐蚀青少年思想，且亵渎众神，对吧？

6.From this point of view I want to say? Was Socrates guilty of impiety?

从这个观点看来，我想说的是，苏格拉底亵渎神明有罪吗？

7.His comments about the church were seen as an act of impiety.

他对教会的评论被视为一种不敬。

8.The novel was criticized for its impiety towards traditional beliefs.

这部小说因对传统信仰的不敬而受到批评。

9.She was accused of impiety for questioning the existence of God.

她因质疑上帝的存在而被指控不敬。

10.The artist's work was considered an expression of impiety by some religious groups.

这位艺术家的作品被一些宗教团体视为一种不敬的表现。

11.In ancient times, acts of impiety could lead to severe punishment.

在古代，不敬的行为可能导致严厉的惩罚。

作文

Impiety is a term that often evokes strong reactions, as it refers to a lack of respect or reverence for sacred things. In many cultures, particularly those deeply rooted in religious traditions, impiety can be seen as a serious moral failing. It challenges the very foundation of societal norms and values that are often built upon a shared belief system. To understand the implications of impiety, we must first examine its origins and how it manifests in various contexts. Historically, impiety has been associated with acts of blasphemy or sacrilege, where individuals openly defy or mock the beliefs held sacred by their communities. For example, in ancient Greece, the crime of impiety was punishable by law, as seen in the trial of Socrates, who was accused of corrupting the youth and impiously questioning the gods of the city. This illustrates how societies have long sought to preserve the sanctity of their beliefs and the potential consequences of challenging them. In contemporary society, impiety can take on new forms, often manifesting in the realm of art, literature, and public discourse. Artists and writers may push boundaries, provoking thought and discussion around topics that some may consider sacred. While this can lead to meaningful dialogue, it can also result in backlash from those who feel that such expressions are disrespectful. The tension between freedom of expression and respect for religious beliefs is a central theme in debates surrounding impiety. Moreover, impiety is not limited to overt actions; it can also be reflected in attitudes and behaviors that dismiss or trivialize the beliefs of others. In a world increasingly characterized by pluralism and diversity, the challenge lies in navigating these differences without falling into the trap of impiety. For instance, discussions about morality, ethics, and spirituality can become contentious when they disregard the significance of others' beliefs, leading to alienation and conflict. It is essential to recognize that while impiety can be seen as a rejection of traditional values, it can also serve as a catalyst for change and progress. Throughout history, individuals who have challenged established norms have often paved the way for greater understanding and acceptance. Movements advocating for social justice, equality, and human rights frequently arise from a place of questioning the status quo, which can be perceived as impiety by those who uphold traditional views. In conclusion, impiety is a multifaceted concept that encompasses a range of attitudes and behaviors towards the sacred. While it can be viewed negatively, it also has the potential to foster dialogue and promote critical thinking. As we navigate our increasingly diverse world, it is crucial to approach discussions of impiety with sensitivity and an open mind. By doing so, we can create a space for respectful engagement that honors both our differences and our shared humanity. Ultimately, understanding impiety requires us to reflect on our values, question our assumptions, and strive for a deeper appreciation of the beliefs that shape our lives.

不敬是一个常常引发强烈反应的术语，因为它指的是对神圣事物缺乏尊重或敬畏。在许多文化中，尤其是那些深植于宗教传统中的文化，不敬可以被视为一种严重的道德缺失。它挑战了通常建立在共同信仰体系基础上的社会规范和价值观。要理解不敬的含义，我们必须首先审视其起源以及它在各种背景下的表现。 历史上，不敬与亵渎或冒犯的行为相关联，个人公开蔑视或嘲弄社区所珍视的信仰。例如，在古希腊，不敬的罪行是法律所禁止的，这在苏格拉底的审判中得到了体现，他被控腐蚀青年和不敬地质疑城市的神灵。这表明，社会长期以来一直试图维护其信仰的神圣性，以及挑战这些信仰可能带来的后果。 在当代社会，不敬可以采取新的形式，常常在艺术、文学和公共话语领域中表现出来。艺术家和作家可能会突破界限，激发关于某些人认为神圣的主题的思考和讨论。虽然这可以导致有意义的对话，但也可能引发来自那些感到这种表达不尊重的人的反击。不敬的自由表达与对宗教信仰的尊重之间的紧张关系是围绕不敬的辩论中的一个核心主题。 此外，不敬不仅限于明显的行为；它还可以反映在对他人信仰的态度和行为中，这些态度和行为轻视或琐碎化他人的信仰。在一个日益以多元化和多样性为特征的世界中，挑战在于如何在不陷入不敬的陷阱中驾驭这些差异。例如，关于道德、伦理和精神性的讨论在无视他人信仰的重要性时可能变得具有争议性，从而导致疏离和冲突。 必须认识到，虽然不敬可以被视为对传统价值观的拒绝，但它也可以作为变革和进步的催化剂。历史上，那些挑战既定规范的个人往往为更大的理解和接受铺平了道路。倡导社会正义、平等和人权的运动常常源于对现状的质疑，这在那些坚持传统观点的人看来可能被视为不敬。 总之，不敬是一个多面向的概念，涵盖了对神圣事物的多种态度和行为。尽管它可以被负面看待，但它也有可能促进对话并促进批判性思维。当我们在日益多样化的世界中航行时，至关重要的是以敏感和开放的心态来处理不敬的讨论。通过这样做，我们可以创造一个尊重参与的空间，既尊重我们的差异，也尊重我们共同的人性。最终，理解不敬要求我们反思我们的价值观，质疑我们的假设，并努力更深刻地欣赏塑造我们生活的信仰。