incrimination

简明释义

英[ɪnˌkrɪmɪˈneɪʃn]美[ɪnˌkrɪmɪˈneɪʃn]

n. 控告；连累

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Thus, to impose a punishment for a preparation that lacks performance must result in a subjective incrimination that is against the principle of " No crime or penalty without a law authorizing it."

原则上处罚预备行为反映了刑罚权在发动时间上的过早提前，仅通过总则的规定处罚缺乏实行行为的预备犯违反了罪刑法定原则，导致了事实上的主观归罪。

2.Thus, to impose a punishment for a preparation that lacks performance must result in a subjective incrimination that is against the principle of " No crime or penalty without a law authorizing it."

原则上处罚预备行为反映了刑罚权在发动时间上的过早提前，仅通过总则的规定处罚缺乏实行行为的预备犯违反了罪刑法定原则，导致了事实上的主观归罪。

3.The lawyer argued that the evidence presented was not sufficient for any incrimination 控罪 of his client.

律师辩称，提出的证据不足以对他的客户进行任何控罪。

4.During the interrogation, the suspect was careful not to provide any information that could lead to his incrimination 自我控罪.

在审讯期间，嫌疑人小心翼翼地不提供任何可能导致他自我控罪的信息。

5.The police officer warned the suspect that anything he said could be used against him in court, which highlighted the risk of incrimination 自我控罪.

警察警告嫌疑人，他所说的任何话都可能在法庭上对他不利，这突显了自我控罪的风险。

6.The defense team worked hard to prevent any evidence from leading to the incrimination 控罪 of their client.

辩护团队努力阻止任何证据导致他们客户的控罪。

7.She feared that her testimony might result in the incrimination 控罪 of an innocent person.

她担心她的证词可能导致一个无辜者的控罪。

作文

In the realm of law and justice, the concept of incrimination plays a crucial role in determining the guilt or innocence of an individual. Incrimination refers to the act of making someone appear guilty of a crime, either through evidence or testimony. This term is often encountered in legal contexts, where the implications of incrimination can significantly affect the outcome of a trial. Understanding the nuances of incrimination is essential for anyone interested in the legal system or criminal justice. One of the most prominent aspects of incrimination is the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty.' This fundamental tenet of law ensures that individuals cannot be convicted based solely on suspicion or unsubstantiated claims. Instead, the prosecution must provide compelling evidence that leads to the incrimination of the accused. This process involves meticulous investigation, gathering of facts, and the presentation of solid proof in court. However, the issue of incrimination is not limited to the courtroom. In everyday life, individuals can find themselves in situations where their words or actions may lead to their own incrimination. For instance, during police interrogations, suspects may inadvertently make statements that could be interpreted as self-incriminating. This is why the right to remain silent is so important; it protects individuals from providing evidence that could be used against them. Furthermore, incrimination can also occur through the actions of others. Witnesses may testify against an individual, leading to their incrimination based on hearsay or circumstantial evidence. This highlights the importance of reliable witness testimonies and the potential for wrongful accusations. The legal system strives to ensure that such testimonies are scrutinized thoroughly to prevent unjust incrimination. The media can also play a significant role in the incrimination of individuals. High-profile cases often attract public attention, and sensationalist reporting can lead to a rush to judgment before a trial even begins. This phenomenon can severely damage an individual's reputation and lead to societal incrimination, where public opinion turns against someone based on incomplete information. In conclusion, the term incrimination encompasses a wide range of implications within the legal system and beyond. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between justice and the rights of the accused. As we navigate the complexities of law and morality, understanding incrimination is vital for fostering a fair and just society. By recognizing the potential for incrimination in various contexts, we can better appreciate the importance of due process and the protection of individual rights in the pursuit of justice.

在法律和正义的领域中，incrimination这一概念在确定个人的有罪或无罪方面发挥着至关重要的作用。Incrimination指的是通过证据或证词使某人看起来有罪的行为。这个术语通常出现在法律背景下，incrimination的影响可能会显著影响审判的结果。理解incrimination的细微差别对于任何对法律系统或刑事司法感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。 Incrimination最突出的一个方面是“无罪推定”的原则。法律的这一基本原则确保个人不能仅仅基于怀疑或没有根据的指控而被定罪。相反，检方必须提供令人信服的证据，以导致被告的incrimination。这个过程涉及细致的调查、事实的收集以及在法庭上提供确凿的证据。 然而，incrimination的问题并不仅限于法庭。在日常生活中，个人可能会发现自己处于某种情况下，他们的话或行为可能导致他们自己的incrimination。例如，在警方审讯期间，嫌疑人可能不经意地做出可能被解读为自我incrimination的陈述。这就是保持沉默权如此重要的原因；它保护个人不提供可能被用来对付他们的证据。 此外，incrimination也可能通过他人的行为发生。证人可能会作证指控某个人，导致他们基于传闻或间接证据而被incrimination。这突显了可靠证人证言的重要性，以及错误指控的潜力。法律系统努力确保这些证言得到充分审查，以防止不公正的incrimination。 媒体也可以在个人的incrimination中发挥重要作用。备受瞩目的案件往往引起公众关注，而耸人听闻的报道可能导致在审判开始之前就急于做出判断。这种现象可能严重损害个人的声誉，并导致社会的incrimination，即基于不完整的信息公众舆论转向某人。 总之，incrimination这一术语在法律系统及其之外涵盖了广泛的含义。它提醒我们在追求正义时，维护被告权利之间的微妙平衡。随着我们在法律和道德的复杂性中航行，理解incrimination对于促进一个公平正义的社会至关重要。通过认识到在各种情况下可能出现的incrimination，我们可以更好地欣赏正当程序的重要性以及在追求正义时保护个人权利的必要性。